Background/Objectives: One of the fastest-growing minority groups in the U.S. is the Hispanic/Latino population. Recent studies have shown how this population is being disproportionately affected by early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC). Compared to corresponding non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, Hispanic/Latino patients have both higher incidence of disease and rates of mortality. Two well-established drivers of early-onset CRC in the general population are alterations in the WNT and TGF-Beta signaling pathways; however, the specific roles of these pathways in Hispanics/Latinos are poorly understood. Methods: Here, we assessed CRC mutations in the WNT and TGF-Beta pathways by conducting a bioinformatics analysis using cBioPortal. Cases of CRC were stratified both by age and ethnicity: (1) early-onset was defined as <50 years vs. late-onset as ≥50 years; (2) we compared early-onset in Hispanics/Latinos to early-onset in NHWs. Results: No significant differences were evident when we compared early-onset and late-onset CRC cases within the Hispanic/Latino cohort. These results are consistent with findings from large cohorts that do not specify ethnicity. However, we found significant differences when we compared early-onset CRC in Hispanic/Latino patients to early-onset CRC in NHW patients: specifically, alterations in the gene bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP7) were more frequent in early-onset CRC for the Hispanic/Latino patients. In addition to these findings, we observed that both NHW patients and Hispanic/Latino patients with early-onset disease had better clinical outcomes when there was evidence of WNT pathway alterations. Conversely, the absence of TGF-Beta pathway alterations was uniquely associated with improved outcomes exclusively in early-onset Hispanic/Latino patients. Conclusions: In toto, these findings underscore how the WNT and TGF-Beta pathways may act differently in different ethnic groups with early-onset CRC. These findings may set a stage for developing new therapies tailored for reducing cancer health disparities.

Colorectal cancer contributes to cancer-related deaths and health disparities in the Hispanic and Latino community. To probe both the biological and genetic bases of the disparities, we characterized features of colorectal cancer in terms of somatic alterations and genetic similarity. Specifically, we conducted a comprehensive genome-scale analysis of 67 Hispanic and Latino samples. We performed DNA exome sequencing for somatic mutations, somatic copy number alterations, and genetic similarity. We also performed RNA sequencing for differential gene expression, cellular pathways, and gene fusions. We analyzed all samples for 22 important CRC gene mutations, 8 gene amplifications, and 25 CRC gene fusions. Then, we compared our data from the Hispanic and Latino samples to publicly available, Non-Hispanic White (NHW) cohorts. According to our analyses, twenty-four percent of colorectal carcinomas were hypermutated when patients were of Peruvians-from-Lima-like (1KG-PEL-like) genetic similarity population from the 1000 genome project. Moreover, most of these cases occurred in patients who were less than fifty years old age at diagnosis. Excluding hypermutated tumors, approximately 55% of colon cancers and 58% of rectum cancers exhibited two similar features: 1) the patterns of genomic alterations; 2) percentage of 1KG-PEL-like. We analyzed all samples -- which had a median 1KG-PEL-like proportion of 55% -- for 22 important CRC gene mutations, 8 gene amplifications, and 25 CRC gene fusions. One notable example of a frequently observed gene mutation was SMAD4. Samples with SMAD4 alterations, which are known to support tumor growth and progression, had the highest 1KG-PEL-like proportion (63%). According to our results from risk association analyses and differential gene expression, SMAD4 alterations were significant when we compared Hispanic and Latino samples to NHW cohorts. Of the 8 drug-targetable amplifications, PIK3CA and PI3K exhibited an average 1KG-PEL-like of over 55%. Of the 25 relevant CRC gene fusions, targetable genes included ALK, FGFR1, RAF1, and PTPRK; PTPRK was observed in a sample with the highest 1KG-PEL-like proportion (95%). Using integrative analysis, we also detected recurrent alterations in the WNT, TGFB, TP53, IGF2/PI3K, and RTK/RAS pathways. Importantly, these alterations mostly occurred in young patients with high 1KG-PEL-like. These findings highlight the potential for tailoring precision medicine therapeutics to an underrepresented population. Our study advances the molecular profiling of CRC in Hispanics and Latinos. In toto, genetic similarity appears to be an important component in understanding colorectal carcinogenesis and has the potential to advance cancer health disparities research. Significance: Our study provides molecular profiles of colorectal cancer in an underserved community, probes the impact of genetic similarity, and sheds light on cancer health disparities. This study provides a comprehensive, genome-scale analysis of colorectal cancers (CRCs) taken from 67 Hispanic and Latino patients. We performed DNA exome sequencing for somatic mutations, somatic copy number alterations, and genetic similarity. We also performed RNA sequencing for differential gene expression, cellular pathways, and gene fusions. Our data from the Hispanic and Latino samples was compared to publicly available, Non-Hispanic White cohorts. In general, colorectal carcinomas from our cohort presented a high proportion (55%) of Peruvians-from-Lima-like (1KG-PEL-like) population from the 1000 genome project. Moreover, hypermutated colorectal carcinomas (24% of cases) predominantly occurred in individuals with 1KG-PEL-like. Most hypermutated cases occurred in young (<50) patients. We assessed our cohort for 22 important CRC gene mutations, 8 gene amplifications, and 25 CRC gene fusions. We cross-referenced results with percentage of 1KG-PEL-like. For example, frequent mutations were observed in a tumor suppressor called SMAD4; samples with SMAD4 alterations had 63% 1KG-PEL-like. Of the 8 drug-targetable amplifications, PIK3CA and PI3K exhibited an average 1KG-PEL-like of over 55%. Of the 25 CRC gene fusions, targetable genes included ALK, FGFR1, RAF1, and PTPRK. PTPRK was observed in a sample with 95% 1KG-PEL-like proportion. Using integrative analysis, we also detected recurrent alterations in the WNT, TGFB, TP53, IGF2/PI3K, and RTK/RAS pathways. Our study thus advances the molecular profiling of CRC in Hispanics and Latinos; suggests precision medicine therapeutics can be tailored to an underrepresented community; and demonstrates genetic similarity can be an important component in understanding colorectal carcinogenesis.

Background/Objectives: Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed before the age of 50, has been increasing in incidence, particularly among Hispanic/Latino (H/L) populations. Despite this trend, the underlying molecular mechanisms driving EOCRC disparities remain poorly understood. The MAPK and JAK/STAT pathways play critical roles in tumor progression, proliferation, and treatment response; however, their involvement in ethnicity-specific differences in EOCRC remains unclear. This study aims to characterize molecular alterations in MAPK and JAK/STAT pathway genes among EOCRC patients, focusing on differences between H/L and Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. Additionally, we assess whether these pathway-specific alterations contribute to survival outcomes in H/L EOCRC patients. Methods: We conducted a bioinformatics analysis using publicly available CRC datasets to assess mutation frequencies in MAPK and JAK/STAT pathway genes. A total of 3412 patients were included in the study, comprising 302 H/L patients and 3110 NHW patients. Patients were stratified by age (EOCRC: <50 years, late-onset colorectal cancer—LOCRC: ≥50 years) and ethnicity (H/L vs. NHW) to evaluate differences in mutation prevalence. Chi-squared tests were performed to compare mutation rates between groups, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to assess overall survival differences based on pathway alterations among both H/L and NHW EOCRC patients. Results: Significant differences were observed in MAPK pathway-related genes when comparing EOCRC and LOCRC in H/L patients. NF1 (11.6% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.01), ACVR1 (2.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.04), and MAP2K1 (3.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.01) were more prevalent in EOCRC, while BRAF mutations (18.3% vs. 5.1%, p = 9.1 × 10⁻⁴) were significantly more frequent in LOCRC among H/L patients. Additionally, when comparing EOCRC in H/L patients to EOCRC in NHW patients, key MAPK pathway genes such as AKT1 (5.1% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.03), MAPK3 (3.6% vs. 0.7%, p = 6.83 × 10⁻³), NF1 (11.6% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.02), and PDGFRB (5.8% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.02) were significantly enriched in H/L EOCRC patients. However, no significant differences were observed in JAK/STAT pathway-related genes when comparing EOCRC and LOCRC in H/L patients, nor when comparing EOCRC in H/L vs. NHW patients. Survival analysis revealed borderline significant differences in H/L EOCRC patients, whereas NHW EOCRC patients with no alterations in the JAK/STAT pathway exhibited significant survival differences. In contrast, MAPK pathway alterations were not associated with significant survival differences. These findings suggest that MAPK and JAK/STAT pathway alterations may have distinct prognostic implications in H/L EOCRC patients, justifying further investigation into their potential role in cancer progression and treatment response. Conclusions: These findings suggest that MAPK pathway dysregulation plays a distinct role in EOCRC among H/L patients, potentially contributing to disparities in CRC development and treatment response. The higher prevalence of MAPK alterations in H/L EOCRC patients compared to NHW patients underscores the need to explore ethnicity-specific tumor biology and therapeutic targets. Conversely, the lack of significant differences in JAK/STAT pathway alterations suggests that this pathway may not play a major differential role in EOCRC vs. LOCRC within this population. Survival analysis highlighted the prognostic relevance of pathway-specific alterations. These insights emphasize the importance of precision medicine approaches that consider genetic heterogeneity and pathway-specific alterations to improve outcomes for H/L CRC patients.

Background/Objectives: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as diagnosis before age 50, has been rising at an alarming rate, with Hispanic/Latino (H/L) individuals experiencing the most significant increases in both incidence and mortality. Despite this growing public health concern, the molecular mechanisms driving EOCRC disparities remain poorly understood. Oncogenic pathways such as WNT, TGF-beta, and RTK/RAS are critical in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression, yet their specific roles in EOCRC across diverse populations have not been extensively studied. This research seeks to identify molecular alterations within these pathways by comparing EOCRC cases in H/L and non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals. Furthermore, we explore the clinical significance of these findings to inform precision medicine strategies tailored to high-risk populations. Methods: To investigate mutation frequencies in genes associated with the WNT, TGF-beta, and RTK/RAS pathways, we conducted a bioinformatics analysis using publicly available CRC datasets. The study cohort consisted of 3412 patients, including 302 H/L and 3110 NHW individuals. The patients were categorized based on age (EOCRC: <50 years; late-onset CRC [LOCRC]: ≥50 years) and population group (H/L vs. NHW) to assess variations in mutation prevalence. Statistical comparisons of mutation rates between the groups were conducted using chi-squared tests, while Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was employed to evaluate overall survival differences associated with pathway alterations. Results: Notable molecular distinctions in the RTK/RAS pathway were identified between EOCRC and LOCRC among the H/L patients, with EOCRC exhibiting a lower frequency of RTK/RAS alterations compared to LOCRC (66.7% vs. 79.3%, p = 0.01). Within this pathway, mutations in CBL (p < 0.05) and NF1 (p < 0.05) were significantly more prevalent in the EOCRC cases (5.8% vs. 1.2% and 11.6% vs. 3.7%, respectively), whereas BRAF mutations were notably less frequent in EOCRC than in LOCRC (5.1% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.05). Comparisons between the EOCRC patients from the H/L and NHW populations revealed distinct pathway-specific alterations that were more common in the H/L individuals. These included RNF43 mutations (12.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.05) in the WNT pathway, BMPR1A mutations (5.1% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.05) in the TGF-beta pathway, and multiple RTK/RAS pathway alterations, such as MAPK3 (3.6% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.05), CBL (5.8% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.05), and NF1 (11.6% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.05). Survival analysis in the H/L EOCRC patients did not reveal statistically significant differences based on pathway alterations. However, in the NHW EOCRC patients, the presence of WNT pathway alterations was associated with significantly improved survival outcomes, suggesting potential ethnicity-specific prognostic implications. Conclusions: This study highlights the substantial molecular heterogeneity present in EOCRC, particularly among high-risk populations. The H/L EOCRC patients exhibited distinct genetic alterations, with a higher prevalence of CBL, NF1, RNF43, BMPR1A, and MAPK3 mutations compared to their NHW counterparts. Additionally, RTK/RAS pathway alterations were less frequent in EOCRC than in LOCRC. Despite these molecular differences, pathway alterations did not significantly impact survival outcomes in the H/L EOCRC patients. However, in the NHW EOCRC patients, the presence of WNT pathway alterations was associated with improved survival. These findings emphasize the necessity for further research to clarify the molecular mechanisms driving EOCRC disparities in high-risk populations and to inform precision medicine strategies for underrepresented groups.

Background/Objectives: This study aims to characterize PI3K and TP53 pathway alterations in Hispanic/Latino patients with early‐onset colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on potential differences compared to non‐Hispanic White patients. Understanding these differences may shed light on the molecular basis of CRC health disparities.Methods: Using cBioPortal, we conducted a bioinformatics analysis to evaluate CRC mutations within the PI3K and TP53 pathways. CRC patients were stratified by age and ethnicity: (1) early‐onset (< 50 years) versus late‐onset (≥ 50 years) and (2) early‐onset in Hispanic/Latino patients compared to early‐onset in non‐Hispanic White patients. Mutation frequencies were assessed using descriptive statistics, with chi‐squared tests comparing proportions between early‐onset Hispanic/Latino and non‐Hispanic White groups. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated to assess overall survival for early‐onset Hispanic/Latino patients, stratified by the presence or absence of PI3K and TP53 pathway alterations.Results: Significant differences were noted when comparing early‐onset CRC in Hispanic/Latino patients to early‐onset CRC in non‐Hispanic White patients. PI3K (47.1% vs. 35.2%, p = 9.39e‐3) and TP53 (89.1% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.04) pathway alterations were more prevalent in early‐onset CRC among Hispanic/Latino patients, with AKT1 (5.1% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.03), INPP4B (4.3% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.04), and TSC1 (7.2% vs. 3.1% p = 0.03) gene alterations also significantly higher in this group. Significant differences were observed in TP53 mutations between colon adenocarcinomas (90% vs. 79.1%, p = 0.03), with higher prevalence in Hispanic/Latino patients when stratified by tumor site. No significant differences were observed between early‐onset and late‐onset CRC patients within the Hispanic/Latino cohort.Conclusions: These findings highlight the distinct role of PI3K and TP53 pathway disruptions in early‐onset CRC among Hispanic/Latino patients, suggesting that pathway‐specific mechanisms may drive cancer health disparities. Insights from this study could inform the potential development of precision medicine approaches and targeted therapies aimed at addressing these disparities.

One of the fastest-growing minority groups in the U.S. is the Hispanic/Latino population. Recent studies have shown how this population is being disproportionately affected by early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC). Compared to corresponding non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, Hispanic/Latino patients have both higher incidence of disease and rates of mortality. Two well-established drivers of early-onset CRC in the general population are alterations in the WNT and TGF-Beta signaling pathways; however, the specific roles of these pathways in Hispanic/Latino are poorly understood. Here, we assessed CRC mutations in the WNT and TGF-Beta pathways by conducting a bioinformatics analysis using cBioPortal. Cases of CRC were stratified both by age and ethnicity: 1) early-onset was defined as <50 years vs. late-onset as ≥50 years; 2) we compared early-onset in Hispanics/Latinos to early-onset in NHWs. No significant differences were evident when we compared early-onset and late-onset CRC cases within the Hispanic/Latino cohort. These results are consistent with findings from large cohorts that do not specify ethnicity. However, we found significant differences when we compared early-onset CRC in Hispanic/Latino patients to early-onset CRC in NHW patients: specifically, alterations in the gene bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP7) were more frequent in early-onset CRC for the Hispanic/Latino patients. In addition to these findings, we observed that both NHW patients and Hispanic/Latino patients with early-onset disease had better clinical outcomes when there was evidence of WNT pathway alterations. Conversely, only the early-onset Hispanic/Latino population had improved outcomes when there was no evidence of TGF-Beta pathway alterations. In toto , these findings underscore how the WNT and TGF-Beta pathways may act differently in different ethnic groups who have early-onset CRC. These findings may set a stage for developing new therapies tailored for reducing cancer health disparities.