Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among American men, following lung cancer. While diet and exercise have been extensively studied in relation to prostate cancer prevention, the evidence remains inconclusive. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify observational studies investigating the association between ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and prostate cancer risk and mortality, determined by the NOVA classification system. In addition, we conducted subgroup analyses to assess the association based on study design, age, and data collection methods. Results: Six studies were identified, including four cohort studies and two case–control studies. No significant association was found between high UPF consumption and increased risk of prostate cancer [RR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96–1.08, n = 5]. However, there was a slight increase in mortality (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.99–1.35, n = 2). A subgroup analysis by the dietary assessment method revealed an RR of 1.01 (95% CI = 0.93–1.09) for studies using the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and 1.04 (95% CI = 0.93–1.16) for studies using 24-h recalls. There was no significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 0, p = 0.82). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests no significant association between high UPF consumption and prostate cancer risk. Given the known associations with other chronic diseases, the potential public health implications of reducing UPF consumption remain important. Further research with the use of more robust food assignment systems and more precise dietary assessments is needed to clarify the role of UPF in prostate cancer development.
Introduction and importance: Primary bladder lymphoma accounts for a mere fraction of vesical tumours and extranodal lymphomas, which mostly affect women. IGH-BCL2 translocation, which occurs in 80–100% of Western follicular variants but only 60% in Asian communities, must be studied to determine its effects on prognosis and treatment. This study analyses and compares relevant literature and data for the authors’ case report. Case presentation: The authors report a 69-year-old Caucasian female with one gross haematuria episode and no smoking history. Computed tomography (CT) showed a bilateral massive intraluminal mass left ureterovesical junction, hydronephrosis, and hydroureter. Clinical discussion: Following the removal of a massive transurethral urinary bladder tumour, histological examination revealed lymphoma cells positive for IRTA and LMO2 but negative for IGH-BCL2. After these analyses, the patient received 3 weeks of 30 Gy/15 f IMRT/IGRT. Comparisons were made to previous case reports’ histopathology. Conclusion: The current case report emphasizes the rarity of primary bladder lymphoma and the absence of the IGH-BCL2 fusion gene. Following the successful administration of 30 Gy of radiation therapy, the patient’s prognosis improved. The report emphasizes clinical vigilance and timely management while also urging further investigation.