Background: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer defined types of surgical resection and considered the positivity of the highest mediastinal lymph node resected a parameter of “uncertain resection” (R-u). We investigated the metastases in the highest mediastinal lymph node, defined as the lowest numerically numbered station among those resected. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of R-u compared with R0.Materials and methods: We selected 550 patients with non-small cell lung cancer at clinical Stage I, IIA, IIB (T3N0M0), or IIIA (T4N0M0) undergoing lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy between 2015 and 2020. The R-u group included patients with positive highest mediastinal resected lymph node.Results: In the groups of patients with mediastinal lymph node metastasis, we defined 31 as R-u (45.6%, 31/68). The incidence of metastases in the highest lymph node was related to the pN2 subgroups (p < 0.001) and the type of lymphadenectomy performed (p < 0.001). The survival analysis compared R0 and R-u: 3-year disease-free survival was 69.0% and 20.0%, respectively, and 3-year overall survival was 78.0% and 40.0%, respectively. The recurrence rate was 29.7% in R0 and 71.0% in R-u (p-value < 0.001), and the mortality rate was 18.9% and 51.6%, respectively (p-value < 0.001). R-u variable showed a tendency to be a significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio: 4.6 and 4.5, respectively, p-value < 0.001).Conclusions: The presence of metastasis in the highest mediastinal lymph node removed seems to be an independent prognostic factor for mortality and recurrence. The finding of these metastases represents the margin of cancer dissemination at the time of surgery, so it could imply metastasis into the N3 node or distant metastasis.

Thymic carcinoma is an epithelial tumor derived from thymic epithelial cells. Thymic tumors may be associated with other simultaneous and/or metachronous extra‐thymic tumors (e.g., lung cancer). Here, we report a case of simultaneous surgical management of lung and mediastinal neoplasm together with a review of the literature. During radiological follow‐up for prostate and colorectal cancer, an 82‐year‐old man was diagnosed with lung cancer with simultaneous mediastinal suspected neoplasm. Both were surgically removed with a single intervention performed via a uniportal video‐assisted thoracic surgery (uni‐VATS) approach. The literature emphasizes how extra‐thymic cancer can be diagnosed before, concurrently and consecutively with thymic neoplasia. The surgical treatment of such simultaneous cancer is challenging. We succeeded in the excision of both neoplasia with a mini‐invasive surgical technique. This report highlights the feasibility of uniportal VATS in a patient with very unusual clinical and oncological history.

Primary synovial sarcoma is a soft tissue tumor which originates from synovial‐like undeveloped mesenchymal structures. Here, we report the case of a giant mediastinal sarcoma in a 41‐year‐old female patient. After diagnosis, she underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Due to its low efficacy, we collegially decided to undergo cytoreductive debulking surgery. The mass invaded the phrenic nerve bilaterally and its excision caused a severe lesion of the left nerve and a partial impairment of the right one. Thus, plastic surgeons decided to reconstruct the right phrenic nerve employing the contralateral remaining fibers.The invasiveness of this tumor, its difficult removal, histological profile and the peculiar technique to preserve diaphragmatic function classify this case as very rare. The therapeutic strategy was based on interdisciplinary teamwork which comprised several specialists' opinions. Our strategy allowed us to pursue the challenging objective to give a young woman with a severe diagnosis the best possible chance of achieving a good quality of life.To the best of our knowledge, this phrenic nerve reconstructive technique is very rare and has not previously been reported in the literature. The report emphasizes that it is possible to deal with an apparently impossible case through a collaborative approach involving several different medical specialist professionals.