Malcolm  Guiver Guiver

Dr. Malcolm Guiver Guiver


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 October 2022 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KPKairi Pullerits
Kairi Pullerits
SGShona Garland
Shona Garland
SRSharmilee Rengarajan
Sharmilee Rengarajan
MGMalcolm Guiver Guiver
Malcolm Guiver Guiver
RCRajkumar Chinnadurai
Rajkumar Chinnadurai
PKPhilip A. Kalra
Philip A. Kalra
Background: Opportunistic infections remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of post-transplant DNA virus infections (CMV, EBV, BKV and JCV infections) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) at a single tertiary centre and evaluate their impact on graft outcomes. Methods: KTR transplanted between 2000 and 2021 were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to identify factors associated with DNA virus infections and their impact on allograft outcomes respectively. A sub-analysis of individual viral infections was also conducted to describe the pattern, timing, interventions, and outcomes of individual infections. Results: Data from 962 recipients were evaluated (Mean age 47.3 ± 15 years, 62% male, 81% white). 30% of recipients (288/962) had infection(s) by one or more of the DNA viruses. Individually, CMV, EBV, BKV and JCV viruses were diagnosed in 13.8%. 11.3%, 8.9% and 4.4% of recipients respectively. Factors associated with increased risk of post-transplant DNA virus infection included recipient female gender, higher number of HLA mismatch, lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), CMV seropositive donor, maintenance with cyclosporin (rather than tacrolimus) and higher number of maintenance immunosuppressive medications. The slope of eGFR decline was steeper in recipients with a history of DNA virus infection irrespective of the virus type. Further, GFR declined faster with an increasing number of different viral infections. Death-censored graft loss adjusted for age, gender, total HLA mismatch, baseline eGFR and acute rejection was significantly higher in recipients with a history of DNA virus infection than those without infection (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR, 1.74, 95% CI, 1.08–2.80)). In contrast, dialysis-free survival did not differ between the two groups of recipients (aHR, 1.13, 95% CI, 0.88–1.47). Conclusion: Post-transplant DNA viral infection is associated with a higher risk of allograft loss. Careful management of immunosuppression and close surveillance of at-risk recipients may improve graft outcomes.

20 December 2024 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRubiya Nadaf
Rubiya Nadaf
HLHelena Lee
Helena Lee
KBKathleen Denise Bonney
Kathleen Denise Bonney
RNRamya Hanasoge Nataraj
Ramya Hanasoge Nataraj
SSSrividhya Senthil
Srividhya Senthil
RWRobert PROF R Paed Wynn
Robert PROF R Paed Wynn
Myeloid chimerism better reflects donor stem cell engraftment than whole-blood chimerism in assessing graft function following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT). We describe our experience with 130 patients aged younger than 18 years, treated with allogeneic HCT using bone marrow or PBSC from HLA-matched donors for non-malignant diseases, whose pre-transplant conditioning therapy included alemtuzumab and who were monitored with lineage-specific chimerism after transplant. At 6 years post-transplant, overall survival (OS) was 91.1% and event-free survival (EFS) was 81.5%, with no grade III-IV acute GvHD or chronic GVHD observed. Recipient T-cells did not contribute to graft loss. Mixed T-cell chimerism (MC) did not affect EFS, and there was no connection between T-cell chimerism and myeloid chimerism in patients with MC or graft loss. MC significantly correlated with virus infection; more children with MC were CMV seropositive than those with complete chimerism (CC). Additionally, MC was more common in patients with CMV viramia post-transplant. CD8 T-cell reconstitution was affected by viral reactivation, including CMV, with CD8 T-cell counts higher in the MC group than in the CC group. Mixed T-cell chimerism is due to autologous, virus-specific, predominantly CD8, T-cell expansion, and is protective and not deleterious to the recipient.