Martin McCarter

Dr. Martin McCarter

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 November 2022 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RTRichard Tobin
Richard Tobin
DCDasha T. Cogswell
Dasha T. Cogswell
VCVictoria M. Cates
Victoria M. Cates
DDDana M. Davis
Dana M. Davis
JBJessica Borgers
Jessica Borgers
MMMartin McCarter
Martin McCarter
Purpose: A phase Ib/II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) with pembrolizumab in patients with stage IV melanoma. Patients and Methods: Anti–PD-1 naïve patients with stage IV melanoma were treated with pembrolizumab plus supplemental ATRA for three days surrounding each of the first four pembrolizumab infusions. The primary objective was to establish the MTD and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the combination. The secondary objectives were to describe the safety and toxicity of the combined treatment and to assess antitumor activity in terms of (i) the reduction in circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) frequency and (ii) progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled, 46% diagnosed with M1a and 29% with M1c stage disease at enrollment. All patients had an ECOG status ≤1, and 75% had received no prior therapies. The combination was well tolerated, with the most common ATRA-related adverse events being headache, fatigue, and nausea. The RP2D was established at 150 mg/m2 ATRA + 200 mg Q3W pembrolizumab. Median PFS was 20.3 months, and the overall response rate was 71%, with 50% of patients experiencing a complete response, and the 1-year overall survival was 80%. The combination effectively lowered the frequency of circulating MDSCs. Conclusions: With a favorable tolerability and high response rate, this combination is a promising frontline treatment strategy for advanced melanoma. Targeting MDSCs remains an attractive mechanism to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapies, and this combination merits further investigation. See related commentary by Olson and Luke, p. 1167

4 April 2019 in PLOS Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSam X Li
Sam X Li
SSSharon Sen
Sharon Sen
JSJennifer M Schneider
Jennifer M Schneider
KXKa-Na Xiong
Ka-Na Xiong
NNNichole M Nusbacher
Nichole M Nusbacher
BPBrent E Palmer
Brent E Palmer
Men who have sex with men (MSM) have differences in immune activation and gut microbiome composition compared with men who have sex with women (MSW), even in the absence of HIV infection. Gut microbiome differences associated with HIV itself when controlling for MSM, as assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing, are relatively subtle. Understanding whether gut microbiome composition impacts immune activation in HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM has important implications since immune activation has been associated with HIV acquisition risk and disease progression. To investigate the effects of MSM and HIV-associated gut microbiota on immune activation, we transplanted feces from HIV-negative MSW, HIV-negative MSM, and HIV-positive untreated MSM to gnotobiotic mice. Following transplant, 16S rRNA gene sequencing determined that the microbiomes of MSM and MSW maintained distinct compositions in mice and that specific microbial differences between MSM and MSW were replicated. Immunologically, HIV-negative MSM donors had higher frequencies of blood CD38+ HLADR+ and CD103+ T cells and their fecal recipients had higher frequencies of gut CD69+ and CD103+ T cells, compared with HIV-negative MSW donors and recipients, respectively. Significant microbiome differences were not detected between HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM in this small donor cohort, and immune differences between their recipients were trending but not statistically significant. A larger donor cohort may therefore be needed to detect immune-modulating microbes associated with HIV. To investigate whether our findings in mice could have implications for HIV replication, we infected primary human lamina propria cells stimulated with isolated fecal microbiota, and found that microbiota from MSM stimulated higher frequencies of HIV-infected cells than microbiota from MSW. Finally, we identified several microbes that correlated with immune readouts in both fecal recipients and donors, and with in vitro HIV infection, which suggests a role for gut microbiota in immune activation and potentially HIV acquisition in MSM. The communities of commensal microbes that colonize the human gut comprise the gut microbiome, which has been shown to play a significant role in shaping the immune system. Recent studies have reported a distinct gut microbiome composition in men who have sex with men (MSM) exhibiting HIV-risk behaviors when compared with low-risk men who have sex with women (MSW), regardless of their HIV infection status. Whether these gut microbiome differences in high-risk MSM directly impact immune activation is important to understand since increased T cell activation is associated with increased HIV transmission risk and more severe disease. To test the immunological effect of the gut microbiome in MSM, we transplanted stool from HIV-negative MSW, HIV-negative high-risk MSM, and HIV-positive MSM to germ-free mice. DNA sequencing showed that specific microbiome differences associated with MSM were successfully engrafted in mice, and that these differences were associated with increased CD4+ and CD8+ T cell activation in the mice. These results provide evidence for a direct link between microbiome composition and immune activation in HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM, and rationale for investigating the gut microbiome as a risk factor for HIV transmission.

17 July 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CACarol Amato
Carol Amato
JHJennifer D. Hintzsche
Jennifer D. Hintzsche
KWKeith Wells
Keith Wells
AAAllison Applegate
Allison Applegate
NGNicholas T. Gorden
Nicholas T. Gorden
WRWilliam Robinson
William Robinson
Immunotherapy, such as anti-PD1, has improved the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma. However, predicting which patients will respond to immunotherapy remains a significant knowledge gap. In this study we analyzed pre-immunotherapy treated tumors from 52 patients with metastatic melanoma and monitored their response based on RECIST 1.1 criteria. The responders group contained 21 patients that had a complete or partial response, while the 31 non-responders had stable or progressive disease. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was used to identify biomarkers of anti-PD1 response from somatic mutations between the two groups. Variants in codons G34 and G41 in NFKBIE, a negative regulator of NFkB, were found exclusively in the responders. Mutations in NKBIE-related genes were also enriched in the responder group compared to the non-responders. Patients that harbored NFKBIE-related gene mutations also had a higher mutational burden, decreased tumor volume with treatment, and increased progression-free survival. RNA sequencing on a subset of tumor samples identified that CD83 was highly expressed in our responder group. Additionally, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis showed that the TNFalpha signaling via NFkB pathway was one of the top pathways with differential expression in responders vs. non-responders. In vitro NFkB activity assays indicated that the G34E variant caused loss-of-function of NFKBIE, and resulted in activation of NFkB signaling. Flow cytometry assays indicated that G34E variant was associated with upregulation of CD83 in human melanoma cell lines. These results suggest that NFkB activation and signaling in tumor cells contributes to a favorable anti-PD1 treatment response, and clinical screening to include aberrations in NFkB-related genes should be considered.

25 March 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDasha T. Cogswell
Dasha T. Cogswell
LGLaurent Gapin
Laurent Gapin
HTHeather M. Tobin
Heather M. Tobin
MMMartin McCarter
Martin McCarter
RTRichard Tobin
Richard Tobin
A recent boom in mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cell research has identified relationships between MAIT cell abundance, function, and clinical outcomes in various malignancies. As they express a variety of immune checkpoint receptors and ligands, and possess strong cytotoxic functions, MAIT cells are an attractive new subject in the field of tumor immunology. MAIT cells are a class of innate-like T cells that express a semi-invariant T cell antigen receptor (TCR) that recognizes microbially derived non-peptide antigens presented by the non-polymorphic MHC class-1 like molecule, MR1. In this review, we outline the current (and often contradictory) evidence exploring MAIT cell biology and how MAIT cells impact clinical outcomes in different human cancers, as well as what role they may have in cancer immunotherapy.

25 July 2022 in The Cancer Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJohn E. Mullinax
John E. Mullinax
MEMichael Egger
Michael Egger
MMMartin McCarter
Martin McCarter
BMBradley J. Monk
Bradley J. Monk
ETEric M. Toloza
Eric M. Toloza
ASAmod Sarnaik
Amod Sarnaik
Adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), an investigational cellular therapy, has demonstrated antitumor efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors, including melanoma. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy involves surgical resection of a patient's tumor, ex vivo TIL expansion under conditions that overcome immunosuppressive responses elicited by the tumor and the tumor microenvironment, administration of a lymphodepleting regimen, and infusion of the final TIL cell therapy product back into the patient followed by interleukin 2 administration to support T-cell activity. The surgeon plays a central role in patient identification and tumor selection—steps that are critical for successful outcomes of TIL cell therapy. Commercialization of TIL cell therapy and its broader access to patients will require education and collaboration among surgeons, oncologists, and cellular therapists. This review highlights the unique role that surgeons will play in the implementation of TIL cell therapy and serves as a contemporary report of best practices for patient selection and tumor resection methods.

16 March 2016 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCBrandon C. Chapman
Brandon C. Chapman
AGAna Gleisner
Ana Gleisner
JKJennifer J. Kwak
Jennifer J. Kwak
PHPatrick Hosokawa
Patrick Hosokawa
APAlessandro Paniccia
Alessandro Paniccia
NKNicole Kounalakis
Nicole Kounalakis