Ines Muro García

Mrs. Ines Muro García

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 October 2024 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DGDiego Santos García
Diego Santos García
LLLydia López‐Manzanares
Lydia López‐Manzanares
IGInes Muro García
Ines Muro García
PLPablo Lorenzo‐Barreto
Pablo Lorenzo‐Barreto
EPElena Casas Peña
Elena Casas Peña
MMMarina Mata
Marina Mata
Background and purpose: Levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) infusion is a recently developed device‐aided therapy for advanced Parkinson disease (PD) patients. The aim of this study was to report real‐world evidence about the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of LECIG in PD patients.Methods: A multicenter observational retrospective study of the first patients who initiated LECIG in Spain was performed. All neurologists with an experience of at least two patients treated until 30 March 2024 were invited to participate. Data about effectiveness and safety from the medical records (V0, pre‐LECIG; V1, initiation of LECIG; V2, post‐LECIG follow‐up) with a total of 246 variables were collected.Results: Seventy‐three PD patients (61.6% males, 70.1 ± 9.1 years old) from 21 Spanish centers with a mean disease duration of 14.4 ± 6.3 years (range = 5–31) were included. Twenty‐six patients (35.6%) were switched directly from levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel. The mean exposure to LECIG was 177.3 ± 110.5 days (range = 7–476). The mean daily OFF time decreased from 5.2 ± 3 (pre‐LECIG) to 1.9 ± 1.8 (post‐LECIG; n = 66, p < 0.0001). Global improvement was observed in >85% of the patients. No significant change was detected in the levodopa equivalent daily dose from V0 to V2. Only 7% received 24‐h infusion, and 24.7% required more than one cartridge per day at V2. Thirty‐four patients (46.6%) had at least one adverse event related to LECIG and/or the device system. Five patients (6.8%) discontinued LECIG.Conclusions: LECIG was safe and effective in advanced PD patients.

11 November 2020 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CGCarmen González‐Ávila
Carmen González‐Ávila
LCLaura Casado
Laura Casado
IGInes Muro García
Ines Muro García
JVJavier Villacieros‐Álvarez
Javier Villacieros‐Álvarez
JVJosé Vivancos
José Vivancos
SQSonia Quintas
Sonia Quintas

12 December 2024 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDiego Santos García
Diego Santos García
LLLydia López-Manzanares
Lydia López-Manzanares
IGInes Muro García
Ines Muro García
PLPablo Lorenzo-Barreto
Pablo Lorenzo-Barreto
EPElena Casas Peña
Elena Casas Peña
MÁMarina Mata Álvarez-Santullano
Marina Mata Álvarez-Santullano
Background and objective: Staging Parkinson’s disease (PD) with a novel simple classification called MNCD, based on four axes (Motor; Non-motor; Cognition; Dependency) and five stages, correlated with disease severity, patients’ quality of life and caregivers’ strain and burden. Our aim was to apply the MNCD classification in advanced PD patients treated with device-aided therapy (DAT). Patients and Methods: A multicenter observational retrospective study of the first patients to start the levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) in Spain was performed (LECIPARK study). The MNCD total score (from 0 to 12) and MNCD stages (from 1 to 5) were collected by the neurologist at V0 (before starting LECIG) and V2 (follow-up visit). Wilcoxon’s signed rank and Marginal Homogeneity tests were applied to compare changes from V0 to V2. Results: Sixty-seven PD patients (58.2% males; 69.9 ± 9.3 years old) with a mean disease duration of 14.4 ± 6.5 years were included. The mean treatment duration (V2) was 172.9 ± 105.2 days. At V0, patients were classified as in stage 2 (35.8%), 3 (46.3%) or 4 (17.9%). The frequency of patients in stage 4 decreased to 9% at V2 (p = 0.001). The MNCD total score decreased from 6.27 ± 1.94 at V0 to 5.21 ± 2.23 (p < 0.0001). From V0 to V2, the motor (M; p < 0.0001) and non-motor symptom (N; p < 0.0001) burden decreased, and autonomy for the activities of daily living (D; p = 0.005) improved. Conclusions: The MNCD classification could be useful to classify advanced PD patients and to monitor the response to a DAT.

6 May 2022 in Neurología (English Edition)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IGInes Muro García
Ines Muro García
CRC. Ramos
C. Ramos
ABA. Barbosa
A. Barbosa
JVJ. Vivancos
J. Vivancos

1 January 2021 in Revista De Neurologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IGInes Muro García
Ines Muro García
ÁCÁlvaro Ximénez Carrillo
Álvaro Ximénez Carrillo
MRMaría Teresa Carreras Rodríguez
María Teresa Carreras Rodríguez
EFElisa de la Fuente
Elisa de la Fuente
ÁAÁfrica Aizpún
África Aizpún
CAClara Aguirre
Clara Aguirre

3 July 2021 in Acta Neurologica Belgica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IGInes Muro García
Ines Muro García
AGAna Beatriz Gago-Veiga
Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
JVJose Vivancos
Jose Vivancos
LVLorena Vega-Piris
Lorena Vega-Piris
MRMiguel Ruiz
Miguel Ruiz
SQSonia Quintas
Sonia Quintas