Maurizio Marchi

Dr. Maurizio Marchi

CNR - Institute of Biosciences and BioResources (IBBR)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2019 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMatteo Pecchi
Matteo Pecchi
Maurizio MarchiMaurizio Marchi
Maurizio Marchi
VBVanessa Burton
Vanessa Burton
FGFrancesca Giannetti
Francesca Giannetti
MMMarco Moriondo
Marco Moriondo
GCGherardo Chirici
Gherardo Chirici

4 December 2020 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maurizio MarchiMaurizio Marchi
Maurizio Marchi
DCDante Castellanos-Acuña
Dante Castellanos-Acuña
AHAndreas Hamann
Andreas Hamann
TWTongli Wang
Tongli Wang
DRDuncan Ray
Duncan Ray
AMAnnette Menzel
Annette Menzel
Interpolated climate data have become essential for regional or local climate change impact assessments and the development of climate change adaptation strategies. Here, we contribute an accessible, comprehensive database of interpolated climate data for Europe that includes monthly, annual, decadal, and 30-year normal climate data for the last 119 years (1901 to 2019) as well as multi-model CMIP5 climate change projections for the 21st century. The database also includes variables relevant for ecological research and infrastructure planning, comprising more than 20,000 climate grids that can be queried with a provided ClimateEU software package. In addition, 1 km and 2.5 km resolution gridded data generated by the software are available for download. The quality of ClimateEU estimates was evaluated against weather station data for a representative subset of climate variables. Dynamic environmental lapse rate algorithms employed by the software to generate scale-free climate variables for specific locations lead to improvements of 10 to 50% in accuracy compared to gridded data. We conclude with a discussion of applications and limitations of this database.

5 April 2018 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maurizio MarchiMaurizio Marchi
Maurizio Marchi
Alessandro PalettoAlessandro Paletto
Alessandro Paletto
PCPaolo Cantiani
Paolo Cantiani
EBElisa 21 Bianchetto
Elisa 21 Bianchetto
IMIsabella De Meo
Isabella De Meo
Provision of forest ecosystem services is influenced by site and stand characteristics as well as forest management practices. In order to evaluate the influence of forest management on ecosystem services provision, two artificial black pine forests located in Central Italy were studied where two different thinning approaches (traditional and selective) were applied under the SelPiBio LIFE project. Four main ecosystem services were selected and assessed: timber and bioenergy production, carbon sequestration, forest stand stability-protection, and biodiversity conservation. Even if not supported by statistical evidence, results highlighted an interesting trend just 2 years after treatment. The selective thinning was able to enhance the majority of ecosystem services compared to the traditional one. A higher growth rate of selected crop trees was measured (i.e., carbon sequestration). The slenderness ratio was sensibly reduced (i.e., mechanical stability) with a positive implication on soil retention and the prevention of landslides. Moreover, valuable and interesting commercial assortments have been proven to be retrieved from the stands with the selective approach. Larger and also better formed trees were harvested, given the impact of selective thinning on the co-dominant class. The Shannon index increased only with the selective thinning intervention. In conclusion, the provided results and methods are encouraging and might represent the basis for novel and longer monitoring efforts.

1 March 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CFCarlotta Ferrara
Carlotta Ferrara
Luca SalvatiLuca Salvati
Luca Salvati
PCPiermaria Corona
Piermaria Corona
RRRaoul Romano
Raoul Romano
Maurizio MarchiMaurizio Marchi
Maurizio Marchi

29 May 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maurizio MarchiMaurizio Marchi
Maurizio Marchi
ISIztok Sinjur
Iztok Sinjur
MBMichele Bozzano
Michele Bozzano
MWMarjana Westergren
Marjana Westergren
WorldClim version 1 is a high-resolution, global climate gridded dataset covering 1961–1990; a “normal” climate. It has been widely used for ecological studies thanks to its free availability and global coverage. This study aims to evaluate the quality of WorldClim data by quantifying any discrepancies by comparison with an independent dataset of measured temperature and precipitation records across Europe. BIO1 (mean annual temperature, MAT) and BIO12 (mean total annual precipitation, MAP) were used as proxies to evaluate the spatial accuracy of the WorldClim grids. While good representativeness was detected for MAT, the study demonstrated a bias with respect to MAP. The average difference between WorldClim predictions and climate observations was around +0.2 °C for MAT and −48.7 mm for MAP, with large variability. The regression analysis revealed a good correlation and adequate proportion of explained variance for MAT (adjusted R2 = 0.856) but results for MAP were poor, with just 64% of the variance explained (adjusted R2 = 0.642). Moreover no spatial structure was found across Europe, nor any statistical relationship with elevation, latitude, or longitude, the environmental predictors used to generate climate surfaces. A detectable spatial autocorrelation was only detectable for the two most thoroughly sampled countries (Germany and Sweden). Although further adjustments might be evaluated by means of geostatistical methods (i.e., kriging), the huge environmental variability of the European environment deeply stressed the WorldClim database. Overall, these results show the importance of an adequate spatial structure of meteorological stations as fundamental to improve the reliability of climate surfaces and derived products of the research (i.e., statistical models, future projections).

17 April 2024 in Environments
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maurizio MarchiMaurizio Marchi
Maurizio Marchi
GBGabriele Bucci
Gabriele Bucci
Paolo IovienoPaolo Iovieno
Paolo Iovieno
DRDuncan Ray
Duncan Ray
Statistical downscaling of climate data has been widely described in the literature, with the aim of improving the reliability of local climatic parameters from coarse-resolution (often >20 km) global datasets. In this article, we present ClimateDT, a dynamic downscaling web tool for monthly historical and future time series at a global scale. The core of ClimateDT is the 1 km 1981–2010 climatology from CHELSA Climate (version 2.1), where the CRU-TS layers for the period 1901-current are overlayed to generate a historic time series. ClimateDT also provides future scenarios from CMIP5 using UKCP18 projections (rcp2.6 and rcp8.5) and CMIP6 using 5 GCMs, also available on the CHELSA website. The system can downscale the grids using a dynamic approach (scale-free) by computing a local environmental lapse rate for each location as an adjustment for spatial interpolation. Local predictions of temperature and precipitation obtained by ClimateDT were compared with climate time series assembled from 12,000 meteorological stations, and the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and the explained variance (R2) were used as indicators of performance. The average MAEs for monthly values on the whole temporal scale (1901–2022) were around 1.26 °C for the maximum monthly temperature, 0.80 °C for the average monthly temperature, and 1.32 °C for the minimum monthly temperature. Regarding monthly total precipitation, the average MAE was 19 mm. As for the proportion of variance explained, average R2 values were always greater than 0.95 for temperatures and around 0.70 for precipitation due to the different degrees of temporal autocorrelation of precipitation data across time and space, which makes the estimation more complex. The elevation adjustment resulted in very accurate estimates in mountainous regions and areas with complex topography and substantially improved the local climatic parameter estimations in the downscaling process. Since its first release in November 2022, more than 1300 submissions have been processed. It takes less than 2 min to calculate 45 locations and around 8 min for the full dataset (512 records).