Portfolio optimization is a fundamental problem in financial theory, aiming to balance risk and return in asset allocation. Traditional models, such as Mean–Variance optimization, are effective, but often fail to account for diversification adequately. This study introduces the Mean–Variance–Entropy (MVE) model, which integrates Tsallis entropy into the classic Mean–Variance framework to enhance portfolio diversification and risk management. Entropy, specifically second-order entropy, penalizes excessive concentration in the portfolio, encouraging a more balanced and diversified allocation of assets. The model is applied to a portfolio of five major cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), and Binance Coin (BNB). The performance of the MVE model is compared with that of the traditional Mean–Variance model, and results demonstrate that the entropy-enhanced model provides better diversification, although with a slightly lower Sharpe ratio. The findings suggest that while the entropy-adjusted model results in a slightly lower Sharpe ratio, it offers better diversification and a more resilient portfolio, especially in volatile markets. This study demonstrates the potential of incorporating entropy into portfolio optimization as a means to mitigate concentration risk and improve portfolio performance. The approach is particularly beneficial for markets such as cryptocurrency, where volatility and asset correlations fluctuate rapidly. This paper contributes to the growing body of literature on portfolio optimization by offering a more diversified, robust, and risk-adjusted approach to asset allocation

This paper introduces a novel multi-objective optimization framework for sustainable portfolio rebalancing under uncertainty. The model simultaneously targets return maximization, downside risk control, and liquidity preservation, addressing the complex trade-offs faced by investors in volatile markets. Unlike traditional static approaches, the framework allows for dynamic asset reallocation and explicitly incorporates nonlinear transaction costs, offering a more realistic representation of trading frictions. Key financial parameters—including expected returns, volatility, and liquidity—are modeled using interval arithmetic, enabling a flexible, distribution-free depiction of uncertainty. Risk is measured through semi-absolute deviation, providing a more intuitive and robust assessment of downside exposure compared to classical variance. A core innovation lies in the behavioral modeling of investor preferences, operationalized through three strategic configurations, pessimistic, optimistic, and mixed, implemented via convex combinations of interval bounds. The framework is empirically validated using a diversified cryptocurrency portfolio consisting of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Binance Coin, observed over a six-month period. The simulation results confirm the model’s adaptability to shifting market conditions and investor sentiment, consistently generating stable and diversified allocations. Beyond its technical rigor, the proposed framework aligns with sustainability principles by enhancing portfolio resilience, minimizing systemic concentration risks, and supporting long-term decision-making in uncertain financial environments. Its integrated design makes it particularly suitable for modern asset management contexts that require flexibility, robustness, and alignment with responsible investment practices.

This paper introduces a novel multi-objective optimization framework for sustainable portfolio rebalancing under uncertainty. The model simultaneously targets return maximization, downside risk control, and liquidity preservation, addressing the complex trade-offs faced by investors in volatile markets. Unlike traditional static approaches, the framework allows for dynamic asset reallocation and explicitly incorporates nonlinear transaction costs, offering a more realistic representation of trading frictions. Key financial parameters—including expected returns, volatility, and liquidity—are modeled using interval arithmetic, enabling a flexible, distribution-free depiction of uncertainty. Risk is measured through semi-absolute deviation, providing a more intuitive and robust assessment of downside exposure compared to classical variance. A core innovation lies in the behavioral modeling of investor preferences, operationalized through three strategic configurations: pessimistic, optimistic, and mixed, implemented via convex combinations of interval bounds.The framework is empirically validated using a diversified cryptocurrency portfolio consisting of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Binance Coin, observed over a six-month period. Simulation results confirm the model’s adaptability to shifting market conditions and investor sentiment, consistently generating stable and diversified allocations. Beyond its technical rigor, the proposed framework aligns with sustainability principles by enhancing portfolio resilience, minimizing systemic concentration risk, and supporting long-term decision-making in uncertain financial environments. Its integrated design makes it particularly suitable for modern asset management contexts that require flexibility, robustness, and alignment with responsible investment practices.

Portfolio optimization is a cornerstone of modern financial decision-making, traditionally based on the mean–variance model introduced by Markowitz. However, this framework relies on restrictive assumptions—such as normally distributed returns and symmetric risk preferences—that often fail in real-world markets, particularly in volatile and non-Gaussian environments such as cryptocurrencies. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a novel multi-objective model that combines expected return maximization, mean absolute deviation (MAD) minimization, and entropy-based diversification into a unified optimization structure: the Mean–Deviation–Entropy (MDE) model. The MAD metric offers a robust alternative to variance by capturing the average magnitude of deviations from the mean without inflating extreme values, while entropy serves as an information-theoretic proxy for portfolio diversification and uncertainty. Three entropy formulations are considered—Shannon entropy, Tsallis entropy, and cumulative residual Sharma–Taneja–Mittal entropy (CR-STME)—to explore different notions of uncertainty and structural diversity. The MDE model is formulated as a tri-objective optimization problem and solved via scalarization techniques, enabling flexible trade-offs between return, deviation, and entropy. The framework is empirically tested on a cryptocurrency portfolio composed of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and Binance Coin (BNB), using daily data over a 12-month period. The empirical setting reflects a high-volatility, high-skewness regime, ideal for testing entropy-driven diversification. Comparative outcomes reveal that entropy-integrated models yield more robust weightings, particularly when tail risk and regime shifts are present. Comparative results against classical mean–variance and mean–MAD models indicate that the MDE model achieves improved diversification, enhanced allocation stability, and greater resilience to volatility clustering and tail risk. This study contributes to the literature on robust portfolio optimization by integrating entropy as a formal objective within a scalarized multi-criteria framework. The proposed approach offers promising applications in sustainable investing, algorithmic asset allocation, and decentralized finance, especially under high-uncertainty market conditions.

We define a new alternate measure of the cumulative residual Sharma-Taneja-Mittal entropy. For this measure, there are given upper and lower bounds, is introduced a consistent test based on the uniform distribution and some concrete numerical examples are formulated.

This paper develops a robust portfolio optimization framework that integrates Weighted Shannon Entropy (WSE) into the classical mean–variance paradigm, offering a distribution-free approach to diversification suited for volatile and heavy-tailed markets. While traditional variance-based models are highly sensitive to estimation errors and instability in covariance structures—issues that are particularly acute in cryptocurrency markets—entropy provides a structural mechanism for mitigating concentration risk and enhancing resilience under uncertainty. By incorporating informational weights that reflect asset-specific characteristics such as volatility, market capitalization, and liquidity, the WSE model generalizes classical Shannon entropy and allows for more realistic, data-driven diversification profiles. Analytical solutions derived from the maximum entropy principle and Lagrange multipliers yield exponential-form portfolio weights that balance expected return, variance, and diversification. The empirical analysis examines two case studies: a four-asset cryptocurrency portfolio (BTC, ETH, SOL, and BNB) over January–March 2025, and an extended twelve-asset portfolio over April 2024–March 2025 with rolling rebalancing and proportional transaction costs. The results show that WSE portfolios achieve systematically higher entropy scores, more balanced allocations, and improved downside protection relative to both equal-weight and classical mean–variance portfolios. Risk-adjusted metrics confirm these improvements: WSE delivers higher Sharpe ratios and less negative Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), together with reduced overexposure to highly volatile assets. Overall, the findings demonstrate that Weighted Shannon Entropy offers a transparent, flexible, and robust framework for portfolio construction in environments characterized by nonlinear dependencies, structural breaks, and parameter uncertainty. Beyond its empirical performance, the WSE model provides a theoretically grounded bridge between information theory and risk management, with strong potential for applications in algorithmic allocation, index construction, and regulatory settings where diversification and stability are essential. Moreover, the integration of informational weighting schemes highlights the capacity of WSE to incorporate both statistical properties and market microstructure signals, thereby enhancing its practical relevance for real-world investment decision-making.