The risk stratification of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major objective for the clinicians, and it can be achieved by coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) or with coronary artery calcium score (CS). CS evaluates underlying coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and CFVR estimates both presence of coronary artery stenosis and microvascular function. Consequently, CFVR may provide unique risk information beyond the extent of coronary atherosclerosis. Our aim is to assess joint prognostic value of CFVR and CS in asymptomatic DM patients. We prospectively included 200 asymptomatic patients (45,5 % male, mean age 57,35 ± 11,25), out of which, there were 101 asymptomatic patients with DM and 99 asymptomatic patients without DM, but with one or more conventionally risk factors for coronary artery disease. We analyzed clinical, biochemical, metabolic, inflammatory parameters, CS by Agatston method, transthoracic Doppler echocardiography CFVR of left anterior descending artery and echocardiographic parameters. Total CS and CS LAD were significantly higher, while mean CFVR was lower in diabetics compared to the nondiabetics. During 1 year follow-up, 24 patients experienced cardio-vascular events (one cardiovascular death, two strokes, three myocardial infarctions, nine new onsets of unstable angina and nine myocardial revascularizations): 19 patients with DM and five non DM patients, (p = 0,003). Overall event free survival was significantly higher in non DM group, compared to the DM group (94,9 % vs. 81,2 %, p = 0,002 respectively), while the patients with CS ≥200 and CFVR <2 had the worst outcome during 1 year follow up in the whole study population as well as in the DM group. At multivariable analysis CFVR on LAD (HR 12.918, 95 % CI 3.865–43.177, p < 0.001) and total CS (HR 13.393, 95 % CI 1.675–107.119, p = 0.014) were independent prognostic predictors of adverse events in DM group of patients. Both CS and CFVR provide independent and complementary prognostic information in asymptomatic DM patients. When two parameters are analyzed together, the risk stratification ability improves, even when DM patients are analyzed together with non DM patients. As a result, DM patients with CS ≥200 and CFVR <2 had the worst outcome. Consequently, the use of two tests identified subset of patients who can derive the most benefit from the intensive prevention measures.

Aim: NT-proBNP has been shown to be a reliable biochemical marker for left ventricular wall stress. The relationship between NT-proBNP and coronary flow reserve (CFR) was evaluated in patients with significant asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Methods: A total of 74 patients with moderate or severe AS, mean age 66.68 +/- 10.02 years (56.75% males), were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent coronary angiography and had no obstructive coronary disease (defined as having no stenosis >50% in diameter). They had all undergone standard transthoracic Doppler-echo study and adenosine stress transthoracic-echo for CFR measurement and laboratory analysis for NT-proBNP measurement. Results: The median NT-proBNP value was significantly increased (417.0 pg/ml; interquartile range [IQR]: 176.8-962.2 pg/ml). NT-proBNP was significantly higher in the group with CFR <= 2.5 (median: 549.0 pg/ml; IQR: 311.5-1131.0 pg/ml; as opposed to median: 291.5 pg/ml; IQR: 123.0-636.2 pg/ml; W = 452; p = 0.012). NT-proBNP showed significant negative correlation with CFR (p = -0.377, p = 0.001). There was also significant correlation between NT-proBNP and E/E', S' and aortic valve resistance. The NT-proBNP value of 334.00 pg/ml was determined as the best cut-off value for the diagnosis of CFR (area under the curve: 0.67; 95%Cl: 0.54-0.79; p < 0.01) and the sensitivity and specificity were 74 and 64%, respectively. Conclusion: Elevated NT-proBNP can indicate patients with impaired CFR in asymptomatic moderate or severe AS patients with preserved ejection fraction and nonobstructive coronary arteries.

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is characterized by proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, edema, and hyperlipidemia. Apart from the traditional causes of NS, such as minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, diabetes, infections, malignancies, autoimmune conditions, and nephrotoxic agents, there are also rare causes of NS, whose knowledge is of the utmost importance. The aim of this article was to highlight the less well-known causes that have a significant impact on diagnosis and treatment. Genetic syndromes such as Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia, familial lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency with two clinical variants (fish-eye Disease and the p.Leu364Pro mutation), lead to NS through mechanisms involving podocyte and lipid metabolism dysfunction. Congenital disorders of glycosylation and Nail–Patella Syndrome emphasize the role of deranged protein processing and transcriptional regulation in glomerular injury. The link of NS with type 1 diabetes, though rare, suggests an etiology on the basis of common HLA loci and immune dysregulation. Histopathological analysis, particularly electron microscopy, shows mainly podocyte damage, mesangial sclerosis, and alteration of the basement membrane, which aids in differentiating rare forms. Prompt recognition of these novel etiologies by genetic analysis, renal biopsy, and an interdisciplinary panel is essential to avoid delays in diagnosis and tailored treatment.