Neville Owen

Dr. Neville Owen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

55Years (1972-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2002 in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stewart TrostStewart Trost
Stewart Trost
NONeville Owen
Neville Owen
ABAdrian E. Bauman
Adrian E. Bauman
JSJames Sallis
James Sallis
WBWendy J Brown
Wendy J Brown
To review and update the evidence relating to the personal, social, and environmental factors associated with physical activity (PA) in adults. Systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature to identify papers published between 1998 and 2000 with PA (and including exercise and exercise adherence). Qualitative reports or case studies were not included. Thirty-eight new studies were located. Most confirmed the existence of factors already known to be correlates of PA. Changes in status were noted in relation to the influence of marital status, obesity, smoking, lack of time, past exercise behavior, and eight environmental variables. New studies were located which focused on previously understudied population groups such as minorities, middle and older aged adults, and the disabled. The newly reported studies tend to take a broader “ecological” approach to understanding the correlates of PA and are more focused on environmental factors. There remains a need to better understand environmental influences and the factors that influence different types of PA. As most of the work in this field still relies on cross-sectional studies, longitudinal and intervention studies will be required if causal relationships are to be inferred.

1 July 2010 in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NONeville Owen
Neville Owen
GHGenevieve Nissa Healy
Genevieve Nissa Healy
CMCharles E. Matthews
Charles E. Matthews
DDDavid Dunstan
David Dunstan
Even when adults meet physical activity guidelines, sitting for prolonged periods can compromise metabolic health. Television (TV) time and objective measurement studies show deleterious associations, and breaking up sedentary time is beneficial. Sitting time, TV time, and time sitting in automobiles increase premature mortality risk. Further evidence from prospective studies, intervention trials, and population-based behavioral studies is required.

1 April 2002 in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NHNancy Humpel
Nancy Humpel
NONeville Owen
Neville Owen
ELEva Leslie
Eva Leslie

1 August 2011 in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAlicia A. Thorp
Alicia A. Thorp
NONeville Owen
Neville Owen
MNMaike Neuhaus
Maike Neuhaus
DDDavid Dunstan
David Dunstan

1 April 2008 in Diabetes Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GHGenevieve Nissa Healy
Genevieve Nissa Healy
DDDavid Dunstan
David Dunstan
JSJo Salmon
Jo Salmon
ECEster Cerin
Ester Cerin
JSJonathan E. Shaw
Jonathan E. Shaw
NONeville Owen
Neville Owen
OBJECTIVE—Total sedentary (absence of whole-body movement) time is associated with obesity, abnormal glucose metabolism, and the metabolic syndrome. In addition to the effects of total sedentary time, the manner in which it is accumulated may also be important. We examined the association of breaks in objectively measured sedentary time with biological markers of metabolic risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Participants (n = 168, mean age 53.4 years) for this cross-sectional study were recruited from the 2004–2005 Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study. Sedentary time was measured by an accelerometer (counts/minute−1 < 100) worn during waking hours for seven consecutive days. Each interruption in sedentary time (counts/min ≥100) was considered a break. Fasting plasma glucose, 2-h plasma glucose, serum triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, weight, height, waist circumference, and resting blood pressure were measured. MatLab was used to derive the breaks variable; SPSS was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS—Independent of total sedentary time and moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity time, increased breaks in sedentary time were beneficially associated with waist circumference (standardized β = −0.16, 95% CI −0.31 to −0.02, P = 0.026), BMI (β = −0.19, −0.35 to −0.02, P = 0.026), triglycerides (β = −0.18, −0.34 to −0.02, P = 0.029), and 2-h plasma glucose (β = −0.18, −0.34 to −0.02, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS—This study provides evidence of the importance of avoiding prolonged uninterrupted periods of sedentary (primarily sitting) time. These findings suggest new public health recommendations regarding breaking up sedentary time that are complementary to those for physical activity.

11 January 2011 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GHGenevieve Nissa Healy
Genevieve Nissa Healy
CMCharles E. Matthews
Charles E. Matthews
DDDavid Dunstan
David Dunstan
EWElisabeth A.H. Winkler
Elisabeth A.H. Winkler
NONeville Owen
Neville Owen
Prolonged sedentary time is ubiquitous in developed economies and is associated with an adverse cardio-metabolic risk profile and premature mortality. This study examined the associations of objectively assessed sedentary time and breaks (interruptions) in sedentary time with continuous cardio-metabolic and inflammatory risk biomarkers, and whether these associations varied by sex, age, and/or race/ethnicity. Cross-sectional analyses with 4757 participants (≥20 years) from the 2003/04 and 2005/06 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). An Actigraph accelerometer was used to derive sedentary time [<100 counts per minute (cpm)] and breaks in sedentary time. Independent of potential confounders, including moderate-to-vigorous exercise, detrimental linear associations (P for trends <0.05) of sedentary time with waist circumference, HDL-cholesterol, C-reactive protein, triglycerides, insulin, HOMA-%B, and HOMA-%S were observed. Independent of potential confounders and sedentary time, breaks were beneficially associated with waist circumference and C-reactive protein (P for trends <0.05). There was limited evidence of meaningful differences in associations with biomarkers by age, sex, or race/ethnicity. Notable exceptions were sex-differences in the associations of sedentary time and breaks with HDL-cholesterol, and race/ethnicity differences in the association of sedentary time with waist circumference with associations detrimental in non-Hispanic whites, null in Mexican Americans, and beneficial in non-Hispanic blacks. These are the first population-representative findings on the deleterious associations of prolonged sedentary time with cardio-metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers. The findings suggest that clinical communications and preventive health messages on reducing and breaking up sedentary time may be beneficial for cardiovascular disease risk.