Background: Proximal humeral fractures requiring surgical stabilization remain a therapeutic challenge. High rates of treatment-related complications have been reported to be associated, particularly in elderly patients with unstable fracture types and diminished bone quality. In recent years, angular stable implants have been introduced to improve the patients’ outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic long-term results after angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures at this Level I trauma center, with special emphasis on fracture healing, functional outcome and treatment related complications. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed functional and radiographic results of 42 patients (average age: 57.8 years) after angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures at an average time of 3.2 (±0.8) years after trauma. Functional results were defined by the Constant shoulder score (CS) and the individual Constant score (CS_indiv). Radiographic results were assessed by a three-view trauma series (anteroposterior, lateral, and axillary view). For operative treatment, two different angular stable implants were used. Twenty-seven patients were stabilized by a HOFER plate, fifteen patients by a Locking Proximal Humerus Plate. Results: Clinical results revealed an average CS of 74.0 points and an average individual CS_indiv of 79.2% points. Fourteen patients had an excellent functional outcome, eight patients a good outcome and fourteen patients had moderate functional results. Six patients (14%) had a poor outcome with less than 55% on CS_indiv. Regarding the radiographic outcome, we had an overall union rate of 95% (40 of 42). Failures of reduction and fixation occurred in fourteen patients (33%), and in nine patients (21%) we had signs of a humeral head necrosis. Re-operation due to treatment-related complications was necessary in two patients (5%). Statistical analysis revealed that the fracture type and the age of the patients had a significant influence on the clinical outcome and on the incidence of treatment-related complications. Conclusion: With regards to fracture healing and functional outcome of the patients, we had a satisfactory outcome after angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. However, we experienced a notably high rate of technical failures and partial humeral head necrosis. Advanced surgical skills and experiences are necessary to achieve correct anatomic reduction and implant fixation, to reduce the risk of these treatment-related complications.

Introduction: Distal radius fractures account for one-fifth of all fractures in the emergency department. Their classification based on standard radiographs is common practice although low inter-observer reliabilities and superiority of computer tomography (CT) scanning in evaluation of joint congruency have been reported. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 96 displaced distal radius fractures scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation using standard radiographic assessment. The radiographs were classified with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA), Fernandez and Frykman classifications by three observers and inter-rater reliabilities were calculated. Additional CT scanning was performed in all cases and the following parameters were assessed: radiocarpal joint involvement, fracture extent into the radial sigmoid notch, i.e. the distal radio-ulnar joint, comminution of the metaphysis, and concomitant ulnar styloid fracture. The CT scans were used as a reference standard to determine sensitivity and accuracy of standard radiographic assessment in evaluation of distal radius fractures. Results: The inter-rater agreement for the AO classification was 35.4%, 68.8% for the Fernandez and 38.5% for the Frykman classification. Fracture extension into the radiocarpal joint was present in 81 cases (84.4%). Sigmoid notch involvement was found in 81 fractures (84.4%). Involvement of both joints was present in 72 cases (75%). The sensitivity of standard radiographs regarding radiocarpal joint involvement was 93.8%. Considering involvement of the distal radio-ulnar joint the false-negative rate using standard radiographs was 61.7% and the test’s accuracy for sigmoid notch involvement was 45.8%. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that involvement of the sigmoid notch is frequently missed in standard radiographs. The presented data support the frequent use of CT imaging to allow the holistic illustration of a fracture’s complexion and to ensure optimal pre-operative planning.

Malunion of phalangeal and metacarpal bones are often associated with impairment of hand function and pose a challenging task for treating surgeons in most cases. When applicable, corrective osteotomy is the treatment of choice, where the affected bone is cut to correct malalignment using chisels or saws. The use of these instruments is associated with several drawbacks especially in hand surgery. We aimed to determine whether a multiple drill-hole (MDH) osteotomy technique was suitable for performing corrective osteotomies of metacarpal and phalangeal bones. This case series included 11 patients with malalignments or malunions of phalangeal or metacarpal bones. Corrective osteotomy was performed with the MDH technique. Follow-up examinations included clinical evaluations and radiography at frequent intervals, between 2 and 22 months postoperatively. In all cases, planned osteotomies were technically feasible with the MDH technique. Apart from one case of a broken drillbit, no intraoperative or postoperative complication was recorded. All performed osteotomies healed within a mean of 6 weeks to radiological consolidation. In all cases, satisfactory results were achieved. The present study was the first to test MDH osteotomy for hand surgery. We demonstrated that MDH was feasible for corrective osteotomies of metacarpal and phalangeal deformities. Advantages included excellent feasibility for osteotomies performed at varying angles, precise execution, reduced risk of collateral damage, and flexibility for performing intra-articular osteotomies.

Purpose: Removal of volar locking plates after healing of a distal radius fracture is becoming increasingly common. However, it is unclear how the fracture healing proceeds and which defects remain. The aim of this study was to assess changes in bone microarchitecture and biomechanical properties in surgically treated radius fracture after volar locking plate removal. Methods: Twelve patients were recruited after undergoing plate removal. High Resolution Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) was used to perform scans of the fractured and contralateral distal radius on average one (M1) and 16 months (M2) after plate removal. Parameters measured were cortical- (Dcomp), trabecular- (Dtrab) and total bone density (D100), as well as cortical thickness (Ct.Th). Axial bone stiffness (FE.Kaxial) was determined through linear micro-finite element analysis (µFEA). Results: At M1, no significant differences between fractured and contralateral side were detected except for Dcomp. At the fractured side, all parameters except for Dtrab increased significantly between M1 and M2. At M2, Ct.Th and FE.Kaxial were significantly higher at the fractured side compared to the contralateral side, but Dcomp remained significantly lower. Qualitatively, closure of the screw holes was observed between M1 and M2, while large trabecular defects remained. Conclusion: Bone (re)modeling at the distal radius is an ongoing process even after plate removal and leads to a partial exaggeration of the bone properties relative to the intact contralateral side. It seems that the bone regains its biomechanical competence by closing screw holes and increasing cortical thickness, which compensates for trabecular defects that cannot be repaired. Level of evidence: III.

Background: This study aimed to compare functional outcomes of a volar plate osteosynthesis for distal radius fractures (DRF) performed with either a standard volar approach (SVA), which required detachment of the pronator quadratus muscle, or a pronator-sparing approach (PqSA).Materials and methods: This prospective randomized controlled study included 106 patients scheduled for volar plate osteosyntheses. Patients were allocated to either the SVA group (n = 53) or the PqSA group (n = 53). Patients were blinded to treatment until completion of the study. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). Secondary outcome parameters were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS). Follow-up examinations were performed at 8 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.Results: Overall, 91 patients were included in the final analysis: 48 in the SVA group and 43 in the PqSA group. The two cohorts were not significantly different in demographic characteristics, including age, sex, injuries on the dominant side, type of injury, and fracture classification. We found significant differences between groups at 6 months in the mean PRWE (SVA: 12.3 ± 10.4, PqSA: 18.9 ± 14.11 points) and in the mean DASH score (SVA: 12.3 ± 11.9, PqSA: 19.3 ± 16.7 points), which favoured the SVA. We found no significant differences between groups in the MMWS or in the PRWE and DASH scores at any other time points.Conclusions: This randomized comparative clinical trial failed to demonstrate that a volar plate osteosynthesis performed with a PqSA could improve the outcome, compared to the SVA, in patients with DRF.Level of evidence: IITrial registrationComparison of Two Volar Plating Systems for Distal Radius Fractures, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03474445), registered 22 March 2018, retrospectively registered,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03474445?cond=radius&cntry=AT&draw=2&rank=1