This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.

Unclaimed
Yu-Ming Zhai
School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China

Basic Info

Basic Info is private.

Honors and Awards

The user has no records in this section


Career Timeline

The user has no records in this section.


Short Biography

The user biography is not available.
Following
Followers
Co Authors
The list of users this user is following is empty.
Following: 0 users

Feed

Journal article
Published: 02 March 2020 in Applied Sciences
Reads 0
Downloads 0

The Chinese government is committed to ensuring separation of municipal solid waste (MSW), promoting the integrated development of the MSW management system with the renewable resource recovery system, and achieving construction of ecological civilization. Guided by the methods in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under five waste disposal scenarios in Beijing under the life cycle framework were assessed in this research. The study included collection and transportation, as well as three end disposal methods (sanitary landfill, incineration, and composting), and the emission reduction benefits of electricity generation from incineration and recycling of renewable resources were taken into account. The results show that an emission reduction benefit of 70.82% could be achieved under Scenario 5 in which kitchen waste and recyclables are sorted and recycled and the residue is incinerated, and the selection of the optimal strategy was not affected by changes in the separation rate. In addition, landfill would emit more GHG than incineration and composting. The results of this study are helpful for the government to make a decision on MSW management considering the goal of GHG emission reduction.

ACS Style

Chunlin Xin; Tingting Zhang; Sang-Bing Tsai; Yu-Ming Zhai; Jiangtao Wang. An Empirical Study on Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculations Under Different Municipal Solid Waste Management Strategies. Applied Sciences 2020, 10, 1673 .

AMA Style

Chunlin Xin, Tingting Zhang, Sang-Bing Tsai, Yu-Ming Zhai, Jiangtao Wang. An Empirical Study on Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculations Under Different Municipal Solid Waste Management Strategies. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10 (5):1673.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chunlin Xin; Tingting Zhang; Sang-Bing Tsai; Yu-Ming Zhai; Jiangtao Wang. 2020. "An Empirical Study on Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculations Under Different Municipal Solid Waste Management Strategies." Applied Sciences 10, no. 5: 1673.

Journal article
Published: 26 January 2018 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Using a survey of 324 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of the Yangtze River Delta in China, this study discusses the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, absorptive capacity, environmental dynamism, and corporate technological innovation performance. The results based on a moderated moderation model show that the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and innovation performance is significantly positive. The absorptive capacity can positively moderate this relationship. When the external environment is in high dynamism, the moderating effect of absorptive capacity will be stronger than when the environment is in low dynamism.

ACS Style

Yu-Ming Zhai; Wan-Qin Sun; Sang-Bing Tsai; Zhen Wang; Yu Zhao; Quan Chen. An Empirical Study on Entrepreneurial Orientation, Absorptive Capacity, and SMEs’ Innovation Performance: A Sustainable Perspective. Sustainability 2018, 10, 314 .

AMA Style

Yu-Ming Zhai, Wan-Qin Sun, Sang-Bing Tsai, Zhen Wang, Yu Zhao, Quan Chen. An Empirical Study on Entrepreneurial Orientation, Absorptive Capacity, and SMEs’ Innovation Performance: A Sustainable Perspective. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (2):314.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu-Ming Zhai; Wan-Qin Sun; Sang-Bing Tsai; Zhen Wang; Yu Zhao; Quan Chen. 2018. "An Empirical Study on Entrepreneurial Orientation, Absorptive Capacity, and SMEs’ Innovation Performance: A Sustainable Perspective." Sustainability 10, no. 2: 314.