The MRN complex (MRX in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, made of Mre11, Rad50 and Nbs1/Xrs2) initiates double-stranded DNA break repair and activates the Tel1/ATM kinase in the DNA damage response. Telomeres counter both outcomes at chromosome ends, partly by keeping MRN-ATM in check. We show that MRX is disabled by telomeric protein Rif2 through an N-terminal motif (MIN, MRN/X-inhibitory motif). MIN executes suppression of Tel1, DNA end-resection and non-homologous end joining by binding the Rad50 N-terminal region. Our data suggest that MIN promotes a transition within MRX that is not conductive for endonuclease activity, DNA-end tethering or Tel1 kinase activation, highlighting an Achilles’ heel in MRN, which we propose is also exploited by the RIF2 paralog ORC4 (Origin Recognition Complex 4) in Kluyveromyces lactis and the Schizosaccharomyces pombe telomeric factor Taz1, which is evolutionarily unrelated to Orc4/Rif2. This raises the possibility that analogous mechanisms might be deployed in other eukaryotes as well.

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), an aggressive and lethal subtype of prostate cancer (PCa), often arises as a resistance mechanism in patients undergoing hormone therapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. NEPC is associated with a significantly poor prognosis and shorter overall survival compared to conventional prostate adenocarcinoma due to its aggressive nature and limited response to standard of care therapies. This transdifferentiation, or lineage reprogramming, to NEPC is characterised by the loss of androgen receptor (AR) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression, and the upregulation of neuroendocrine (NE) biomarkers such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin-A (CHGA), synaptophysin (SYP), and neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (NCAM1/CD56), which are critical for NEPC diagnosis. The loss of AR expression culminates in resistance to standard of care PCa therapies, such as androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) which target the AR signalling axis. This review explores the drivers of NE transdifferentiation. Key genetic alterations, including those in the tumour suppressor genes RB1, TP53, and PTEN, and changes in epigenetic regulators, particularly involving EZH2 and cell-fate-determining transcription factors (TFs) such as SOX2, play significant roles in promoting NE transdifferentiation and facilitate the lineage switch from prostate adenocarcinoma to NEPC. The recent identification of several other key novel drivers of NE transdifferentiation, including MYCN, ASCL1, BRN2, ONECUT2, and FOXA2, further elucidates the complex regulatory networks and pathways involved in this process. We suggest that, given the multifactorial nature of NEPC, novel therapeutic strategies that combine multiple modalities are essential to overcome therapeutic resistance and improve patient outcomes.

Background/Objectives: The HOX genes encode a family of homeodomain-containing transcription factors that have important roles in defining cell and tissue identity in embryonic development, but which also show deregulated expression in many cancers and have been shown to have pro-oncogenic roles. Due to their functionally redundant nature, strategies to target HOX protein function in cancer have focused on their interaction with their PBX cofactor using competitive peptides such as HXR9. HOX/PBX inhibition triggers apoptosis through a sudden increase in target gene expression, including Fos, DUSP1, and ATF3, which are otherwise repressed by HOX/PBX binding. Methods: We analyzed publicly available transcriptomic data in the R2 platform. Results: We show that a specific subgroup of HOX genes is negatively correlated with Fos, DUSP1, and ATF3 expression in prostate cancer, and that this subgroup also shows a strong positive corelation with pathways that support tumour growth, most notably DNA repair and aminoacyl tRNA biosynthesis, and a negative correlation with genes that promote cell adhesion and prevent motility. In addition, this set of HOX genes strongly correlates with patient age, reflecting a previously identified progressive loss of regulation of HOX expression in normal peripheral blood cells. Conclusions: Our findings indicate these HOX genes may have pro-oncogenic functions in prostate cancer.