Mathieu Bolhuis

Dr. Mathieu Bolhuis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2013 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMathieu Bolhuis
Mathieu Bolhuis
RARichard van Altena
Richard van Altena
DSDick van Soolingen
Dick van Soolingen
WLWiel C.M. de Lange
Wiel C.M. de Lange
DUDonald R.A. Uges
Donald R.A. Uges
JAJan-Willem C. Alffenaar
Jan-Willem C. Alffenaar
The use of linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is limited by dose- and time-dependent toxicity. Recently, we reported a case of pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction between linezolid and clarithromycin that resulted in increased linezolid exposure. The aim of this prospective pharmacokinetic study is to quantify the effect of clarithromycin on the exposure of linezolid.Subjects were included in an open-label, single-centre, single-arm, fixed-order pharmacokinetic interaction study. All subjects received 300 mg linezolid twice daily during the entire study, consecutively co-administered with 250 mg and 500 mg clarithromycin once daily. Steady-state serum curves of linezolid and clarithromycin were analysed using validated methods, and differences between pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated.Linezolid exposure increased by a median (interquartile range) of 44% (23–102%, p=0.043) after co-administration of 500 mg clarithromycin (n=5) compared to baseline, whereas 250 mg clarithromycin had no statistically significant effect. Co-administration was well tolerated by most patients; none experienced severe adverse effects. One patient reported common toxicity criteria grade 2 gastrointestinal adverse events.In this study, we showed that clarithromycin significantly increased linezolid serum exposure after combining clarithromycin with linezolid in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients. The drug–drug interaction is possibly P-glycoprotein-mediated. Due to large interpatient variability, therapeutic drug monitoring is advisable to determine individual effect size.

9 July 2015 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMathieu Bolhuis
Mathieu Bolhuis
STSimon Tiberi
Simon Tiberi
GSGiovanni Sotgiu
Giovanni Sotgiu
SLSaverio De Lorenzo
Saverio De Lorenzo
JKJos G.W. Kosterink
Jos G.W. Kosterink
JAJan-Willem C. Alffenaar
Jan-Willem C. Alffenaar

18 November 2011 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMathieu Bolhuis
Mathieu Bolhuis
PPPrashant N. Panday
Prashant N. Panday
APArianna D. Pranger
Arianna D. Pranger
JKJos Kosterink
Jos Kosterink
JAJan-Willem C Alffenaar
Jan-Willem C Alffenaar
Like any other drug, antimicrobial drugs are prone to pharmacokinetic drug interactions. These drug interactions are a major concern in clinical practice as they may have an effect on efficacy and toxicity. This article provides an overview of all published pharmacokinetic studies on drug interactions of the commonly prescribed antimicrobial drugs oxazolidinones, rifamycines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactams, focusing on systematic research. We describe drug-food and drug-drug interaction studies in humans, affecting antimicrobial drugs as well as concomitantly administered drugs. Since knowledge about mechanisms is of paramount importance for adequate management of drug interactions, the most plausible underlying mechanism of the drug interaction is provided when available. This overview can be used in daily practice to support the management of pharmacokinetic drug interactions of antimicrobial drugs.

11 June 2020 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMathieu Bolhuis
Mathieu Bolhuis
TWTjip S van der Werf
Tjip S van der Werf
OAOnno W. Akkerman
Onno W. Akkerman
To the Editor: Conradie et al. (March 5 issue)1 report that in the Nix-TB study, 90% of the patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis had treatment success, although 5.3% of the patients with positive baseline tuberculosis cultures (3 of 57 patients) had bedaquiline resistance, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) above the critical concentration. In the PRAXIS study involving patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis who were treated with bedaquiline, we found that 5.4% of the patients with positive baseline cultures (5 of 92 patients) had mutations in the bedaquiline resistance gene Rv0678, with MICs near the critical concentration.2 Three of the 5 patients had . . .

22 August 2019 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMathieu Bolhuis
Mathieu Bolhuis
TWTjip S. van der Werf
Tjip S. van der Werf
HKHuib Kerstjens
Huib Kerstjens
WLWiel C.M. de Lange
Wiel C.M. de Lange
JAJan-Willem C. Alffenaar
Jan-Willem C. Alffenaar
OAOnno W. Akkerman
Onno W. Akkerman

1 March 2015 in Bioanalysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSusan Hofman
Susan Hofman
MBMathieu Bolhuis
Mathieu Bolhuis
RKRemco A Koster
Remco A Koster
OAOnno W. Akkerman
Onno W. Akkerman
SASander van Assen
Sander van Assen
JAJan-Willem C Alffenaar
Jan-Willem C Alffenaar
Respiratory tract infections are among the most common infections in men. We reviewed literature to document their pharmacological treatments, and the extent to which therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is needed during treatment. We subsequently examined potential use of dried blood spots as sample procedure for TDM. TDM was found to be an important component of clinical care for many (but not all) pulmonary infections. For gentamicin, linezolid, voriconazole and posaconazole dried blood spot methods and their use in TDM were already evident in literature. For glycopeptides, β-lactam antibiotics and fluoroquinolones it was determined that development of a dried blood spot (DBS) method could be useful. This review identifies specific antibiotics for which development of DBS methods could support the optimization of treatment of pulmonary infections.