Giovanni Sgroi

Prof. Dr. Giovanni Sgroi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 August 2017 in Parasitology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDiego Piantedosi
Diego Piantedosi
BNBenedetto Neola
Benedetto Neola
NDNicola D’alessio
Nicola D’alessio
FPFrancesca Di Prisco
Francesca Di Prisco
MSMario Santoro
Mario Santoro
VVVincenzo Veneziano
Vincenzo Veneziano

11 November 2020 in Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LNLinda A. Ndiana
Linda A. Ndiana
GLGianvito Lanave
Gianvito Lanave
CDCostantina Desario
Costantina Desario
SBShadia Berjaoui
Shadia Berjaoui
FAFlora Alfano
Flora Alfano
NDNicola Decaro
Nicola Decaro

16 September 2021 in Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSGiovanni Sgroi
Giovanni Sgroi
RIRoberta Iatta
Roberta Iatta
RLRiccardo Paolo Lia
Riccardo Paolo Lia
ENEttore Napoli
Ettore Napoli
FBFrancesco Buono
Francesco Buono
Domenico OtrantoDomenico Otranto
Domenico Otranto
Citizen science may be described as a research involving communities and individuals, other than scientists. Following this approach, along with the evidence of a high prevalence of Rickettsia spp. in Dermacentor marginatus from wild boars in hunting areas of southern Italy, this study aimed to assess the occurrence of tick‐borne pathogens (TBPs) in ticks collected from hunters and their hunting dogs. From October 2020 to May 2021, ticks were collected from wild boar hunters (n = 347) and their dogs (n = 422) in regions of southern Italy (i.e., Apulia, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania and Sicily). All ticks were morphologically identified, classified according to gender, feeding status, host, geographic origin, and molecularly screened for zoonotic bacteria. Adult ticks (n = 411) were collected from hunters (i.e., n = 29; 8.4%; mean of 1.6 ticks for person) and dogs (i.e., n = 200; 47.4%; mean of 1.8 ticks for animal) and identified at species level as D. marginatus (n = 240, 58.4%), Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (n = 135, 32.8%), Rhipicephalus turanicus (n = 27, 6.6%) and Ixodes ricinus (n = 9, 2.2%). Overall, 45 ticks (i.e., 10.9%, 95% CI: 8.3‐14.3) tested positive for at least one tick‐borne agent, being Rickettsia slovaca the most frequent species (n = 37, 9.0%), followed by Rickettsia raoultii, Rickettsia aeschlimannii, Rickettsia monacensis, Coxiella burnetii, Borrelia lusitaniae and Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii (n = 2, 0.5% each). Data herein presented demonstrate a relevant risk of exposure to TBPs for hunters and hunting dogs during the hunting activities. Therefore, the role of hunters to monitor the circulation of ticks in rural areas may be considered an effective example of the citizen science approach, supporting the cooperation toward private and public health stakeholders.

5 July 2019 in Parasites & Vectors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mario SantoroMario Santoro
Mario Santoro
MVMaurizio Viscardi
Maurizio Viscardi
GSGiovanni Sgroi
Giovanni Sgroi
NDNicola D'Alessio
Nicola D'Alessio
VVVincenzo Veneziano
Vincenzo Veneziano
GFGiovanna Fusco
Giovanna Fusco
Background: Toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic parasitic disease caused by Toxoplasma gondii, a widespread protozoan in the phylum Apicomplexa. In Europe, several studies have demonstrated the presence of the parasite in tissues of wild boars (Sus scrofa), but no data exists on the T. gondii load in tissues which in turn may be an useful way to assess the infection risk for the consumer of wild boar meat. Methods: We sampled and tested a total of 472 tissue samples of brain, heart and masseter muscle from 177 wild boars from the Campania region of southern Italy by real-time PCR analyses for detection and quantification of T. gondii. The sensitivity and specificity of the method were calculated by ROC analysis curves. Results: PCR analysis revealed the presence of T. gondii in tissue samples of 78 out of 177 (44%) wild boars. In general, the brain presented the highest PCR prevalence (31%), followed by the heart (28.3%) and the masseter muscle (24.2%), with the highest estimated parasite numbers observed in the brain followed by the heart and masseter muscle. The PCR method showed an excellent discriminating ability for each of the examined tissues. According to the ROC analysis curves, the respective sensitivity and specificity were 99 and 100% for masseter muscle, 98 and 98% for brain and 96 and 98% for heart samples. Conclusions: The high prevalence of infection here detected suggests a widespread distribution of the parasite in the wildlife of the Campania region of southern Italy. The T. gondii burdens detected may potentially represent a source of infection for humans.

28 September 2020 in Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGiovanni Sgroi
Giovanni Sgroi
RIRoberta Iatta
Roberta Iatta
RLRiccardo Paolo Lia
Riccardo Paolo Lia
NDNicola D’aLessio
Nicola D’aLessio
RMRanju Ravindran Santhakumari Manoj
Ranju Ravindran Santhakumari Manoj
Domenico OtrantoDomenico Otranto
Domenico Otranto

29 March 2021 in Zoonoses and Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGrazia GRECO
Grazia GRECO
AZAya Attia koraney Zarea
Aya Attia koraney Zarea
GSGiovanni Sgroi
Giovanni Sgroi
Maria TempestaMaria Tempesta
Maria Tempesta
NDNicola D'Alessio
Nicola D'Alessio
BCBruno Chomel
Bruno Chomel
Bartonellae are emerging vector‐borne pathogens infecting humans, domestic mammals and wildlife. Ninety‐seven red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), 8 European badgers (Meles meles), 6 Eurasian wolves (Canis lupus), 6 European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus), 3 beech martens (Martes foina) and 2 roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) from Italian Nature Conservatory Parks were investigated for Bartonella infection. Several Bartonella species (9.84%; 95% CI: 4.55–15.12), including zoonotic ones, were molecularly detected among wolves (83.3%; 95% CI: 51–100.00), foxes (4.12%; 95% CI: 0.17–8.08), hedgehogs (33.33%; 95% CI: 0.00–71.05) and a roe deer. Bartonella rochalimae was the most common Bartonella species (i.e. in 4 foxes and 2 wolves) detected. Candidatus B. merieuxii and B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii were identified for the first time in wolves. Furthermore, Bartonella schoenbuchensis was identified in a roe deer and a new clone with phylogenetic proximity to B. clarridgeiae was detected in European hedgehogs. Zoonotic and other Bartonella species were significantly more frequent in Eurasian wolves (p < .0001), than in other free‐ranging wild mammals, representing a potential reservoir for infection in humans and domestic animals.