Laurie R. Goodrich

Dr. Laurie R. Goodrich

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 June 2020 in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BLBethany E. Liebig
Bethany E. Liebig
JKJohn Kisiday
John Kisiday
CBChelsea S. Bahney
Chelsea S. Bahney
NENicole P. Ehrhart
Nicole P. Ehrhart
LGLaurie R. Goodrich
Laurie R. Goodrich
Platelet‐rich plasma is autologous plasma that contains concentrated platelets compared to whole blood. It is relatively inexpensive to produce, can be easily isolated from whole blood, and can be administered while the patient is in the operating room. Further, because platelet‐rich plasma is an autologous therapy, there is minimal risk for adverse reactions to the patient. Platelet‐rich plasma has been used to promote bone regeneration due to its abundance of concentrated growth factors that are essential to wound healing. In this review, we summarize the methods for producing platelet‐rich plasma and the history of its use in bone regeneration. We also summarize the growth factor profiles derived from platelet‐rich plasma, with emphasis on those factors that play a direct role in promoting bone repair within the local fracture environment. In addition, we discuss the potential advantages of combining platelet‐rich plasma with mesenchymal stem cells, a multipotent cell type often obtained from bone marrow or fat, to improve craniofacial and long bone regeneration. We detail what is currently known about how platelet‐rich plasma influences mesenchymal stem cells in vitro, and then highlight the clinical outcomes of administering platelet‐rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cells as a combination therapy to promote bone regeneration in vivo.

1 April 2017 in Stem Cells and Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAimée C. Colbath
Aimée C. Colbath
SDSteven W. Dow
Steven W. Dow
JPJennifer N. Phillips
Jennifer N. Phillips
CMC. Wayne McIlwraith
C. Wayne McIlwraith
LGLaurie R. Goodrich
Laurie R. Goodrich
The use of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMDMSCs) may provide an effective alternative to autologous BMDMSCs for treatment of equine musculoskeletal injuries. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential safety and effectiveness of allogeneic BMDMSCs. We conducted studies to assess the immunological properties of equine allogeneic BMDMSCs compared with those of autologous BMDMSCs. For assessment of inherent immunogenicity, the relative ability of allogeneic and autologous BMDMSCs to stimulate spontaneous proliferation of equine lymphocytes was compared. The immunosuppressive activity of the two cell types was evaluated by adding autologous or allogeneic BMDMSCs to activated lymphocytes and assessing suppression of lymphocyte proliferation and IFNγ production. Fifty-six allogeneic and 12 autologous combinations were evaluated. Studies were also done to elucidate mechanisms by which equine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) suppress lymphocyte function. Potential mechanisms evaluated included production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), nitric oxide, transforming growth factor-beta, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. We found that autologous and allogeneic BMDMSCs both induced mild but equivalent levels of spontaneous lymphocyte activation in vitro. In in vitro assays assessing the ability of BMDMSCs to suppress activated lymphocytes, both allogeneic and autologous BMDMSCs suppressed T cell proliferation and IFNγ production to an equal degree. The primary mechanism of equine BMDMSC suppression of T cells was mediated by PGE2. We concluded that allogeneic and autologous BMDMSCs are equivalent in terms of their immunomodulatory properties, and stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells appear to trigger the immunosuppressive properties of MSCs. Therefore, both cell types appear to have equal potency in modulating inflammatory processes related to acute or chronic musculoskeletal injuries in the horse.

1 January 2013 in Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLaurie R. Goodrich
Laurie R. Goodrich
JPJennifer N Phillips
Jennifer N Phillips
CMC Wayne McIlwraith
C Wayne McIlwraith
SFStacey B Foti
Stacey B Foti
JGJoshua C Grieger
Joshua C Grieger
RSR Jude Samulski
R Jude Samulski
Osteoarthritis (OA) affects over 40 million people annually. We evaluated interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) gene transfer in an equine model based on IL-1ra protein therapy which inhibits inflammation through blocking IL-1. Using the self-complementary adeno-associated virus (scAAV)IL-1ra equine gene as a starting construct, we optimized the transgene cassette by analyzing promoters (cytomegalovirus (CMV) versus chicken β-actin hybrid (CBh)), coding sequences (optimized versus unoptimized), vector capsid (serotype 2 versus chimeric capsid), and biological activity in vitro. AAV serotypes 2 and 2.5 CMV scAAVoptIL-1ra were tested in equine joints. We evaluated two doses of scAAVIL-1ra, scAAVGFP, and saline. We developed a novel endoscopy procedure and confirmed vector-derived transgene expression (GFP) in chondrocytes 6 months post-injection. AAVIL-1ra therapeutic protein levels were 200–800 ng/ml of synovial fluid over 23 and 186 days, respectively. No evidence of intra-articular toxicity was detected and no vector genomes were found in contralateral joints based on GFP fluorescence microscopy and quantitative PCR. Finally, we assayed vector-derived IL-1ra activity based on functional assays which supported anti-inflammatory activity of our protein. These studies represent the first large animal intra-articular gene transfer approach with a therapeutic gene using scAAV and demonstrate high levels of protein production over extended time supporting further clinical investigation using scAAV gene therapy for OA.

1 August 2006 in Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLaurie R. Goodrich
Laurie R. Goodrich

27 December 2017 in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAlyssa N. Ball
Alyssa N. Ball
SDSeth W. Donahue
Seth W. Donahue
SWSamantha J. Wojda
Samantha J. Wojda
CMC. Wayne McIlwraith
C. Wayne McIlwraith
CKChristopher E. Kawcak
Christopher E. Kawcak
LGLaurie R. Goodrich
Laurie R. Goodrich
Conventional clinical management of complex bone healing scenarios continues to result in 5–10% of fractures forming non‐unions. Additionally, the aging population and prevalence of osteoporosis‐related fractures necessitate the further exploration of novel ways to augment osteogenesis in this special population. This review focuses on the current clinical modalities available, and the ongoing clinical and pre‐clinical research to promote osteogenesis in segmental bone defects, delayed unions, and osteoporosis. In summary, animal models of fracture repair are often small animals as historically significant large animal models, like the dog, continue to gain favor as companion animals. Small rodents have well‐documented limitations in comparing to fracture repair in humans, and few similarities exist. Study design, number of studies, and availability of funding continue to limit large animal studies. Osteoinduction with rhBMP‐2 results in robust bone formation, although long‐term quality is scrutinized due to poor bone mineral quality. PTH 1‐34 is the only FDA approved osteo‐anabolic treatment to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Limited to 2 years of clinical use, PTH 1‐34 has further been plagued by dose‐related ambiguities and inconsistent results when applied to pathologic fractures in systematic human clinical studies. There is limited animal data of PTH 1‐34 applied locally to bone defects. Gene therapy continues to gain popularity among researchers to augment bone healing. Non‐integrating viral vectors and targeted apoptosis of genetically modified therapeutic cells is an ongoing area of research. Finally, progenitor cell therapies and the content variation of patient‐side treatments (e.g., PRP and BMAC) are being studied. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1559–1572, 2018.

23 April 2015 in Gene Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LGLaurie R. Goodrich
Laurie R. Goodrich
JGJ C Grieger
J C Grieger
JPJ N Phillips
J N Phillips
NKN Khan
N Khan
SGS J Gray
S J Gray
RSR J Samulski
R J Samulski