The relevance of the endoscopic activity of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been translated into the new concept of “mucosal healing (MH)” as the therapeutic goal to achieve because a large amount of scientific data have revealed the favorable prognostic value of a healed mucosa in determining the clinical outcome of UC. Recent interest in MH has skewed toward not only endoscopic remission but also histological improvement (so called histological MH). However, we should recognize that there were no prospectively validated endoscopic scoring systems of UC activity in previous clinical trials. Artificial intelligence (AI)‐assisted endoscopy has been developed for gastrointestinal cancer surveillance. Recently, several AI‐assisted endoscopic systems have been developed for assessment of MH in UC. In the future, the development of new endoscopic scoring system based on AI might standardize the definition of MH. Therefore, “The road to an exact definition of MH in the treatment of UC has begun only now”.

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) primarily cause respiratory symptoms. However, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms can also occur. The endoscopic characteristics of the GI tract in COVID‐19 patients remain unclear. We herein report a 62‐year‐old male with severe COVID‐19 who needed multidisciplinary treatment, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Despite the improvement in his respiratory status, GI bleeding developed. Capsule endoscopy and colonoscopy revealed extensive mucosal sloughing in the lower intestinal tract. Additionally, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the mRNA expression levels of various proinflammatory cytokines in the intestinal mucosal tissues. The results suggested a significant elevation of IL‐6, which could be involved in the pathophysiology of the GI involvement in COVID‐19. Further investigation with more clinical data, including endoscopic findings and molecular analyses, will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of COVID‐19‐associated GI injury.

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) causes acquired von Willebrand syndrome by the excessive shear stress–dependent cleavage of high molecular weight multimers of von Willebrand factor (VWF). While the current standard diagnostic method is so-called VWF multimer analysis that is western blotting under nonreducing conditions, it remains unclear whether a ratio of VWF Ristocetin co-factor activity (VWF:RCo) to VWF antigen levels (VWF:Ag) of 30 mmHg, 27 patients with peripheral artery disease, and 46 control patients free of cardiovascular disease with osteoarthritis, diabetes, and so on. We assumed a large multimer index of <80% as loss of VWF large multimers since 59.0% of patients with severe AS had the indices of <80%, while no control patients or patients with peripheral artery disease, except for 2 patients, exhibited the indices of <80%. The VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios, measured using an automated blood coagulation analyzer, were correlated with the indices (r_s = 0.470, P < .001). When the ratio of <0.7 was used as a cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity to VWF large multimer indices of <80% were 0.437 and 0.826, respectively. VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios of <0.7 may indicate loss of VWF large multimers with high specificity, but low sensitivity. VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios in patients with AS having a ratio of <0.7 may be useful for monitoring the loss of VWF large multimers during their clinical courses.

Background and Aim: Recently, noninvasive fecal markers have been used as indicators of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a clinical validation study to measure fecal calprotectin (Cp), lactoferrin (Lf), and hemoglobin (Hb) levels using an all‐in‐one kit in patients with IBD and colorectal tumors and aimed to clarify the utility of these fecal markers.Methods: In this study, 104 patients were analyzed, including 25 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 20 with Crohn's disease (CD), 48 with colorectal tumors, and 13 healthy controls (HC). Of the 48 patients with colorectal tumors, 14 had invasive cancer. We validated the utility of fecal Cp, Lf, and Hb levels by simultaneously measuring fecal markers in patients with IBD and colorectal tumors.Results: Fecal Cp and Lf had almost equivalent abilities in detecting clinical remission in patients with UC; however, fecal Cp was slightly superior to Lf. Regarding colorectal tumors, fecal Cp and Lf levels tended to be higher in patients with adenomas and colorectal cancer than in HCs. Although fecal Hb alone had the best sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal cancer, it had relatively low sensitivity for detecting advanced neoplasms and colorectal cancer.Conclusion: Fecal Cp and Lf can be used as almost equivalent biomarkers to assess the clinical activity in patients with UC. Fecal Hb is the most useful marker for screening colorectal cancer; however, adding fecal Cp and Lf may compensate for the low sensitivity of detecting for advanced colorectal tumors based on Hb alone.