Macular edema (ME) remains a primary cause of visual deterioration in uveitis. Visual acuity (VA) can often be maintained using corticosteroid depot systems. This study evaluated the efficacy of a fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN^®) in treating non-infectious uveitis using real-world data. This retrospective analysis included 135 eyes subdivided into responders and non-responders. Central retinal thickness (CRT), VA, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were followed over time. A significant decrease in CRT and an increase in VA were observed in all eyes throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.01). An IOP increase (p = 0.028) necessitated treatment in 43% of eyes by Month 6. Non-responders were older (p = 0.004) and had been treated with more dexamethasone (DEX) implants (p = 0.04); 89.3% had a defect in the external limiting membrane (ELM) and inner/outer segment (IS/OS) zone (p < 0.001). Immunomodulatory therapy had no impact on treatment response. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) patients had a mean CRT reduction of 47.55 µm and a reduced effect by Month 24 (p = 0.046) versus non-PPV patients. We conclude that the FAc implant achieves long-term control of CRT and improves VA. Increases in IOP were manageable. Eyes with a previous PPV showed milder results. Data showed a correlation between older age, a damaged ELM and IS/OS zone, frequent DEX inserts, and poorer outcome measures.

Purpose: To assess the results of partial monovision (PMV) in comparison to a bilateral monofocal implantation (MMV). Methods: The PMV group was treated bilaterally with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, followed 3 months later by the implantation of a multifocal AddOn® lens (+ 3.00 D) into the non-dominant eye. The MMV group received a bilateral monofocal IOL implantation intending to achieve a slight anisometropia (0.0 D/ − 0.50 D). The near visual acuity (UNVA), intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), distance visual acuity (UDVA), defocus curve, and Lang-Stereotest II were conducted uncorrected, binocular, and minimum 3 months after the last operation. For the contrast sensitivity test, the patients were refractively corrected. The Quality of Vision Questionnaire (QoV), Visual Function Questionnaire (VF-14), spectacle independence, and general satisfaction were also assessed. Results: A total of 27 PMV patients and 28 MMV patients without ocular diseases relevant to visual acuity were examined. The PMV group was significantly better at UNVA (0.11 ± 0.08 logMAR vs 0.56 ± 0.16 logMAR) and between − 2.00 and − 4.00 D in the defocus curve (p < 0.001). At the UIVA, the PMV group was slightly better (0.11 ± 0.10 logMAR vs 0.20 ± 0.18 logMAR) but not significant (p = 0.054). The UDVA (− 0.13 ± 0.09 logMAR vs − 0.09 ± 0.14 logMAR) (p = 0.315) and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.667) revealed no differences between the groups. The stereo vision was in favor of PMV (p = 0.008). Spectacle independence was statistically better for PMV at distance, intermediate, and near (distance p = 0.012; intermediate p < 0.001; near p < 0.001). In the VF-14 Questionnaire, the PMV was statistically superior (p < 0.001). The QoV Questionnaire showed no differences regarding frequency and severity of visual disturbances. Both groups were highly satisfied (p = 0.509). Conclusion: Patients with PMV are more independent of glasses and are able to read without disadvantages in distance vision, due to halos and glare. The concept of PMV is well suited for the desire of eyeglass independence, without optical side effects.

There is early evidence of extraocular systemic signals effecting function and morphology in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The prospective, cross-sectional BIOMAC study is an explorative investigation of peripheral blood proteome profiles and matched clinical features to uncover systemic determinacy in nAMD under anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal therapy (anti-VEGF IVT). It includes 46 nAMD patients stratified by the level of disease control under ongoing anti-VEGF treatment. Proteomic profiles in peripheral blood samples of every patient were detected with LC-MS/MS mass spectrometry. The patients underwent extensive clinical examination with a focus on macular function and morphology. In silico analysis includes unbiased dimensionality reduction and clustering, a subsequent annotation of clinical features, and non-linear models for recognition of underlying patterns. The model assessment was performed using leave-one-out cross validation. The findings provide an exploratory demonstration of the link between systemic proteomic signals and macular disease pattern using and validating non-linear classification models. Three main results were obtained: (1) Proteome-based clustering identifies two distinct patient subclusters with the smaller one (n = 10) exhibiting a strong signature for oxidative stress response. Matching the relevant meta-features on the individual patient’s level identifies pulmonary dysfunction as an underlying health condition in these patients. (2) We identify biomarkers for nAMD disease features with Aldolase C as a putative factor associated with superior disease control under ongoing anti-VEGF treatment. (3) Apart from this, isolated protein markers are only weakly correlated with nAMD disease expression. In contrast, applying a non-linear classification model identifies complex molecular patterns hidden in a high number of proteomic dimensions determining macular disease expression. In conclusion, so far unconsidered systemic signals in the peripheral blood proteome contribute to the clinically observed phenotype of nAMD, which should be examined in future translational research on AMD.

Background: Adalimumab, an anti-TNF-α biologic agent, has emerged as a principal treatment option for patients with non-infectious uveitis. The influence of adalimumab anti-drug antibodies (AAA) on the efficacy of adalimumab therapy is not yet fully understood. We aim to understand their clinical implications in the context of therapeutic drug monitoring and the factors contributing to the formation of these antibodies. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 114 patients with non-infectious uveitis who developed AAA while undergoing adalimumab therapy. Results: Among the 114 AAA-positive uveitis patients, a significant correlation was observed between AAA levels and reduced adalimumab serum levels (r = −0.58, p < 0.001). The mean time to AAA detection was 2.1 years (range 0.1–11.9 years), with 45.6% of cases identified through routine testing. If AAA levels were initially low, subsequent measurements for AAA were more likely to become negative during treatment (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). Higher AAA concentrations were associated with a shorter time to detection (r = −0.27, p = 0.01) and younger age (r = −0.21, p = 0.03). There was a trend, though no significant influence, of concomitant immunosuppression with prednisolone ≤ 7.5 mg or methotrexate on antibody formation (p = 0.18). No significant difference was observed in AAA levels between uveitis subtypes. Conclusions: Higher AAA concentrations are associated with lower adalimumab serum levels in uveitis patients. Routine clinical testing is essential for optimal therapeutic drug monitoring to prevent early loss of effectiveness.

Objective: IgG4-Related Orbital Disease (IgG4-ROD) is an incompletely understood differential of idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndrome (IOIS). Accurate separation guides therapy and prognosis. This retrospective study also profiles its clinical features, therapy needs, and compares them with IOIS. Methodology: Fifty-four patients were biopsied between January 2016 and December 2023, comprising 18 who were diagnosed with IgG4-ROD (4 definite, 14 probable) and 36 with IOIS. Mean follow-up was 21.7 ± 26.2 months for IgG4-ROD versus 7.5 ± 10.3 months for IOIS. Results: Patients with IgG4-ROD were older than those with IOIS (mean 61.8 vs. 49.9 years). Gender distribution was balanced. The lacrimal gland (66.7% vs. 61.6%; p = 0.690) and extra-ocular muscles (55.6% vs. 30.6%; p = 0.076) were frequently involved in both entities, whereas paranasal sinus infiltration was significantly associated with IgG4-ROD (p = 0.003). Common shared symptoms (p > 0.05) included eyelid swelling (83.3% vs. 86.1%), exophthalmos (50% vs. 36.1%), and motility restriction (22.2% vs. 25%). Relative afferent pupillary defect (p = 0.042), chemosis (p = 0.02), and systemic disease (p = 0.005) were more prevalent in IgG4-ROD. During ≥ 6-month follow-up (n = 7), only 28.6% of IgG4-ROD patients achieved sustained remission; Kaplan–Meier analysis yielded a mean time to first event of 926 days. Additional steroid-sparing therapy was required more often in IgG4-ROD than in IOIS (p = 0.002). Conclusion: IgG4-ROD and IOIS share clinical features but differ in key aspects such as associated diseases, therapy requirements, and disease control. Understanding these differences is crucial for targeted diagnostics and individualized treatment strategies.

Uveitis is a potentially vision-threatening intraocular inflammation of the uvea, predominantly observed in individuals aged 20 to 60 years. Anterior uveitis (AU) — characterized by inflammation of...