The timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in severe acute kidney injury (AKI) remains controversial, with early initiation resulting in unnecessary therapy for some patients while expectant therapy may delay RRT for other patients. The furosemide stress test (FST) has been shown to predict the need for RRT and therefore could be used to exclude low-risk patients from enrollment in trials of RRT timing. We conducted this multicenter pilot study to determine whether FST could be used to screen patients at high risk for RRT and to determine the feasibility of incorporating FST into a trial of early initiation of RRT. FST was performed using intravenous furosemide (1 mg/kg in furosemide-naive patients or 1.5 mg/kg in previous furosemide users). FST-nonresponsive patients (urine output less than 200 mL in 2 h) were then randomized to early (initiation within 6 h) or standard (initiation by urgent indication) RRT. FST was completed in all patients (100%). Only 6/44 (13.6%) FST-responsive patients ultimately received RRT while 47/60 (78.3%) nonresponders randomized to standard RRT either received RRT or died (P < 0.001). Among 118 FST-nonresponsive patients, 98.3% in the early RRT arm and 75% in the standard RRT arm received RRT. The adherence to the protocol was 94.8% and 100% in the early and standard RRT group, respectively. We observed no differences in 28-day mortality (62.1 versus 58.3%, P = 0.68), 7-day fluid balance, or RRT dependence at day 28. However, hypophosphatemia occurred more frequently in the early RRT arm (P = 0.002). The furosemide stress test appears to be feasible and effective in identifying patients for randomization to different RRT initiation times. Our findings should guide implementation of large-scale randomized controlled trials for the timing of RRT initiation. clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02730117 . Registered 6 April 2016.

Introduction: Renal biopsy is a useful diagnostic procedure. In developing countries, two techniques of renal biopsy, blind percutaneous renal biopsy and real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy, have been performed. The majority of studies compared these using different types and sizes of biopsy needle. The aim of this study was to compare both techniques in resource constraint country. Method: We reviewed renal biopsy database, between 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2017. The primary outcome was the total number of glomeruli. The other outcomes were tissue adequacy and bleeding complications. We also analyzed multivariable logistic regression to find factors associated with tissue adequacy and bleeding complications. Result: Of the 204 renal biopsies, 100 were blind percutaneous renal biopsy and 104 real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy. The number of native renal biopsies was 169 (82.8%). Baseline characteristics of two groups were comparable. The mean number of total glomeruli from real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy was significantly more than blind percutaneous renal biopsy (20.8 ± 12.1 vs 16.0 ± 13.0, p = 0.001). The real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy obtained more adequate tissues than blind percutaneous renal biopsy (45.2% vs 16%, p < 0.001) and was the only factor associated with adequate tissue. Moreover, 16 renal biopsies from blind percutaneous renal biopsy obtained inadequate tissue. The overall bleeding complications were not statistically different. We found being female, lower eGFR and lower hematocrit were associated with bleeding complications. Conclusion: In comparison with blind percutaneous renal biopsy, real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy obtained more adequate tissue and number of glomeruli. While the complications of both were comparable. We encourage to practice and perform real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in resource constraint countries.

Background. Aging is associated with a high risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), and the elderly with AKI show a higher mortality rate than those without AKI. In this study, we compared AKI outcomes between elderly and nonelderly patients in a university hospital in a developing country. Materials and Methods. This retrospective cohort study included patients with AKI who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017. The patients were divided into the elderly (eAKI; age ≥65 years; n = 158) and nonelderly (nAKI; n = 142) groups. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, principle diagnosis, renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement, hospital course, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results. The eAKI group included more females, patients with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, and patients with more comorbidities than the nAKI group. The etiology and staging of AKI were similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality () and RRT requirement () between the two groups. After adjusting for covariates, the 28-day mortality rate was similar between the two groups (), but the 28-day RRT requirement was higher in the eAKI group than in the nAKI group (). Conclusion. Elderly and nonelderly ICU patients showed similar survival outcomes of AKI, although the elderly were at a higher risk of requiring RRT.

High intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the relationship between intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and AKI in medical septic patients is still inconclusive. This prospective cohort study enrolled patients admitted in the Medical Intensive Care Unit from April 2020 to February 2021. Demographic, therapeutic, and laboratory data were obtained upon admission. The evaluation of IAP was performed via the intra-vesical method during the first and second 24 hours of admission. Kidney function was evaluated on the first 3 days and at least on the 7^th day of enrollment. Among 79 patients, 30 (38%) developed IAH, while 50 (63.3%) developed AKI within 7 days. On the first day, the mean IAP was 15.4 (interquartile range [IQR], 4) and 7.0 (IQR, 3.7) mm Hg in the IAH and non-IAH groups, respectively. A total of 52 patients (65.8%) developed the primary outcome (i.e., a composite outcome including AKI, treatment with kidney replacement therapy, or death). On Cox proportional-hazards model between IAH and outcomes, after adjustment for multiple covariates, IAH was associated with a composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 6.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3–18.6; P < .005) and the development of AKI (HR, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.3–18.8; P < .005). IAH was associated with a composite outcome of AKI, treatment with kidney replacement therapy, or death in medical septic patients. thaiclinicaltrial.org, Identifier: TCTR20200531001, Registered May 24, 2020.

Background: Percutaneous kidney biopsy (PKB) is the gold standard for diagnosing various kidney diseases, but it can result in potential complications. This study aimed to compare kidney tissue adequacy and safety between the two biopsy techniques, including cranial direction (CN) and caudal direction (CD), of needle biopsy under real-time ultrasonogram guidance. Methods: This single-center, prospective, single-blinded, randomized trial included patients undergoing native PKB from July 5, 2017, to June 30, 2019. Patients were randomized to the CN and CD groups. Adequacy and complications between the two groups were analyzed. All PKBs were performed under real-time ultrasonogram guidance with a 16-gauge kidney biopsy needle. Results: A total of 107 participants were enrolled (53 in the CD group and 54 in the CN group). The CD group has more glomeruli than the CN group but with no statistical significance (16 versus 11, p = 0.0865). The CD group obtained more adequate kidney tissue samples than the CN group (69.8% versus 59.3%, p = 0.348). The number of inadequate glomeruli tissue sampling is similar in both groups (14 versus 15, respectively). Furthermore, the CN group had more adverse events, including Hb decline ≥ 10% after kidney biopsy, perinephric hematoma size ≥ 1 cm, hematuria, and the need for blood transfusion, than the CD group. Conclusion: The CD technique of the percutaneous kidney biopsy in the native kidney has fewer complications and was possibly more effective than the CN technique.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused extensive morbidity and mortality worldwide. Hemodialysis (HD) patients are both vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and tend to suffer greater disease severity and mortality. This retrospective study aimed to compare medium cut-off (MCO) and low-flux (LF) membrane dialyzers in terms of interleukin-6 (IL-6) reduction, change in inflammatory state, intradialytic complications, and mortality in chronic HD patients with COVID-19. Method: HD patients with a confirmed COVID-19 infection were admitted to the hospital for 10–14 days and underwent HD at the COVID-HD unit. Choice of dialyzer membrane used (MCO vs. LF) depended on the primary nephrologist(s). We collected data on demographics, baseline characteristics, laboratory results, diagnosis, treatments, HD prescription, hemodynamic status during HD, and mortality at 14 and 28 days after. Results: IL-6 reduction ratio (RR) in the MCO group was 9.7 (interquartile range, 71.1) percent, which was significantly higher than that of the LF group (RR, −45.7 [interquartile range, 70.2] percent). The incidence rate of intradialytic hypotension in the MCO group was 3.846 events per 100 dialysis hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.954–6.856), which was significantly lower than that of the LF group (9.057; 95% CI, 5.592–13.170). Overall, mortality was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: The MCO membrane was more effective in removing IL-6 and was better tolerated than the LF membrane. Large, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the relative benefits of the MCO membrane, especially mortality. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our results suggest that the MCO membrane may be beneficial in chronic HD patients with COVID-19.