Gülinnaz Ercan

Prof. Dr. Gülinnaz Ercan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 November 2017 in BioImpacts
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NMNavid Hosseini Mansoub
Navid Hosseini Mansoub
Mehmet GurdalMehmet Gurdal
Mehmet Gurdal
EKElif Karadadaş
Elif Karadadaş
HKHilal Kabadayi
Hilal Kabadayi
SVSeda Vatansever
Seda Vatansever
GEGülinnaz Ercan
Gülinnaz Ercan
Introduction: Diabetic burn wounds and ulcers are significant complications of diabetic patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the use of platelet rich-plasma (PRP) and/or keratinocyte-like cells (KLCs) in diabetic thermal wound rat model and to evaluate EGF, FGF-2, TGF-β1, COL1α2, MCP-1 and VEGF-α as wound healing markers at gene expression level. Method: In this study, we used adipose tissue as the source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and differentiated MSCs into KLCs. KLCs were characterized and transferred to the burn areas on the dorsum of streptozotocine (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. We prepared PRP from rat blood and evaluated its effect alone or in combination with KLCs. On 3rd, 7th, 10th and 14th days after treatment, wound areas were measured and biopsy samples were excised from the wound areas of the KLCs and/or PRP-treated and untreated diabetic rats to analyze gene expression levels of wound healing markers by qPCR. Results: We observed that, wound contraction started earlier in the PRP and/or KLCs-treated groups in comparison to the control group. However, PRP and KLCs when applied in combination showed additive affect in wound healing. In all groups treated with KLCs and/or PRP, the gene expression levels of evaluated growth factors and COL1α2 increased, while MCP-1 levels decreased when compared to the untreated diabetic rats. In addition, the most prominent difference in qPCR results belongs to combined PRP and KLCs-treated group. Conclusion: We demonstrated that applying PRP and KLCs in combination has a greater potential for treatment of diabetic burn wounds.

26 November 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mehmet GurdalMehmet Gurdal
Mehmet Gurdal
GEGülinnaz Ercan
Gülinnaz Ercan
OSOzlem Barut Selver
Ozlem Barut Selver
IAINSERM Aberdam
INSERM Aberdam
Dimitrios ZeugolisDimitrios Zeugolis
Dimitrios Zeugolis
Despite the promising potential of cell-based therapies developed using tissue engineering techniques to treat a wide range of diseases, including limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), which leads to corneal blindness, their commercialization remains constrained. This is primarily attributable to the limited cell sources, the use of non-standardizable, unscalable, and unsustainable techniques, and the extended manufacturing processes required to produce transplantable tissue-like surrogates. Herein, we present the first demonstration of the potential of a novel approach combining collagen films (CF), hyaluronic acid (HA), human telomerase-immortalized limbal epithelial stem cells (T-LESCs), and macromolecular crowding (MMC) to develop innovative biomimetic substrates for limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs). The initial step involved the fabrication and characterization of CF and CF enriched with HA (CF-HA). Subsequently, T-LESCs were seeded on CF, CF-HA, and tissue culture plastic (TCP). Thereafter, the effect of these matrices on basic cellular function and tissue-specific extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition with or without MMC was evaluated. The viability and metabolic activity of cells cultured on CF, CF-HA, and TCP were found to be similar, while CF-HA induced the highest (p < 0.05) cell proliferation. It is notable that CF and HA induced cell growth, whereas MMC increased (p < 0.05) the deposition of collagen IV, fibronectin, and laminin in the T-LESC culture. The data highlight the potential of, in particular, immortalized cells and MMC for the development of biomimetic cell culture substrates, which could be utilized in ocular surface reconstruction following further in vitro, in vivo, and clinical validation of the approach.