Arne Astrup

Dr. Arne Astrup

1. Healthy Weight Initiative, the Novo Nordisk Foundation & Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports (NEXS), 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 July 2015 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XPXavier Pi-Sunyer
Xavier Pi-Sunyer
AAArne Astrup
Arne Astrup
KFKen Fujioka
Ken Fujioka
FGFrank Greenway
Frank Greenway
AHAlfredo Halpern
Alfredo Halpern
JWJohn Wilding
John Wilding
Obesity is a chronic disease with serious health consequences, but weight loss is difficult to maintain through lifestyle intervention alone. Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, has been shown to have potential benefit for weight management at a once-daily dose of 3.0 mg, injected subcutaneously.

1 January 2000 in International Journal of Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFA Flint
A Flint
ARA Raben
A Raben
JBJe Blundell
Je Blundell
AAArne Astrup
Arne Astrup

1 February 1998 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFA Flint
A Flint
Anne RabenAnne Raben
Anne Raben
AAArne Astrup
Arne Astrup
Jens HolstJens Holst
Jens Holst
We examined the effect of intravenously infused glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) on subjective appetite sensations after an energy-fixed breakfast, and on spontaneous energy intake at an ad libitum lunch. 20 young, healthy, normal-weight men participated in a placebo-controlled, randomized, blinded, crossover study. Infusion (GLP-1, 50 pmol/ kg.h or saline) was started simultaneously with initiation of the test meals. Visual analogue scales were used to assess appetite sensations throughout the experiment and the palatability of the test meals. Blood was sampled throughout the day for analysis of plasma hormone and substrate levels. After the energy-fixed breakfast, GLP-1 infusion enhanced satiety and fullness compared with placebo (treatment effect: P < 0.03). Furthermore, spontaneous energy intake at the ad libitum lunch was reduced by 12% by GLP-1 infusion compared with saline (P = 0.002). Plasma GLP-1, insulin, glucagon, and blood glucose profiles were affected significantly by the treatment (P < 0.002). In conclusion, the results show that GLP-1 enhanced satiety and reduced energy intake and thus may play a physiological regulatory role in controlling appetite and energy intake in humans.

1 November 2009 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAArne Astrup
Arne Astrup
SRStephan Rössner
Stephan Rössner
LGLuc Van Gaal
Luc Van Gaal
ARAila Rissanen
Aila Rissanen
LNLeo Niskanen
Leo Niskanen
MLMichael Ej Lean
Michael Ej Lean

1 November 2007 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRobin Christensen
Robin Christensen
PKPernelle Kruse Kristensen
Pernelle Kruse Kristensen
EBElse Marie Bartels
Else Marie Bartels
HBHenning Bliddal
Henning Bliddal
AAArne Astrup
Arne Astrup

1 January 2015 in Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RFRichard Feinman
Richard Feinman
WPWendy K. Pogozelski
Wendy K. Pogozelski
AAArne Astrup
Arne Astrup
RBRichard K. Bernstein
Richard K. Bernstein
EFEugene J. Fine
Eugene J. Fine
NWNicolai Worm
Nicolai Worm
The inability of current recommendations to control the epidemic of diabetes, the specific failure of the prevailing low-fat diets to improve obesity, cardiovascular risk, or general health and the persistent reports of some serious side effects of commonly prescribed diabetic medications, in combination with the continued success of low-carbohydrate diets in the treatment of diabetes and metabolic syndrome without significant side effects, point to the need for a reappraisal of dietary guidelines. The benefits of carbohydrate restriction in diabetes are immediate and well documented. Concerns about the efficacy and safety are long term and conjectural rather than data driven. Dietary carbohydrate restriction reliably reduces high blood glucose, does not require weight loss (although is still best for weight loss), and leads to the reduction or elimination of medication. It has never shown side effects comparable with those seen in many drugs. Here we present 12 points of evidence supporting the use of low-carbohydrate diets as the first approach to treating type 2 diabetes and as the most effective adjunct to pharmacology in type 1. They represent the best-documented, least controversial results. The insistence on long-term randomized controlled trials as the only kind of data that will be accepted is without precedent in science. The seriousness of diabetes requires that we evaluate all of the evidence that is available. The 12 points are sufficiently compelling that we feel that the burden of proof rests with those who are opposed.