Nicolás Mongiardino Koch

Dr. Nicolás Mongiardino Koch

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 May 2021 in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNicolás Mongiardino Koch
Nicolás Mongiardino Koch
Phylogenomic subsampling is a procedure by which small sets of loci are selected from large genome-scale data sets and used for phylogenetic inference. This step is often motivated by either computational limitations associated with the use of complex inference methods or as a means of testing the robustness of phylogenetic results by discarding loci that are deemed potentially misleading. Although many alternative methods of phylogenomic subsampling have been proposed, little effort has gone into comparing their behavior across different data sets. Here, I calculate multiple gene properties for a range of phylogenomic data sets spanning animal, fungal, and plant clades, uncovering a remarkable predictability in their patterns of covariance. I also show how these patterns provide a means for ordering loci by both their rate of evolution and their relative phylogenetic usefulness. This method of retrieving phylogenetically useful loci is found to be among the top performing when compared with alternative subsampling protocols. Relatively common approaches such as minimizing potential sources of systematic bias or increasing the clock-likeness of the data are found to fare worse than selecting loci at random. Likewise, the general utility of rate-based subsampling is found to be limited: loci evolving at both low and high rates are among the least effective, and even those evolving at optimal rates can still widely differ in usefulness. This study shows that many common subsampling approaches introduce unintended effects in off-target gene properties and proposes an alternative multivariate method that simultaneously optimizes phylogenetic signal while controlling for known sources of bias.

5 May 2021 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NKNicolás Mongiardino Koch
Nicolás Mongiardino Koch
RGRussell J. Garwood
Russell J. Garwood
LPLuke A. Parry
Luke A. Parry
Fossils provide our only direct window into evolutionary events in the distant past. Incorporating them into phylogenetic hypotheses of living clades can help time-calibrate divergences, as well as elucidate macroevolutionary dynamics. However, the effect fossils have on phylogenetic reconstruction from morphology remains controversial. The consequences of explicitly incorporating the stratigraphic ages of fossils using tip-dated inference are also unclear. Here, we use simulations to evaluate the performance of inference methods across different levels of fossil sampling and missing data. Our results show that fossil taxa improve phylogenetic analysis of morphological datasets, even when highly fragmentary. Irrespective of inference method, fossils improve the accuracy of phylogenies and increase the number of resolved nodes. They also induce the collapse of ancient and highly uncertain relationships that tend to be incorrectly resolved when sampling only extant taxa. Furthermore, tip-dated analyses under the fossilized birth–death process outperform undated methods of inference, demonstrating that the stratigraphic ages of fossils contain vital phylogenetic information. Fossils help to extract true phylogenetic signals from morphology, an effect that is mediated by both their distinctive morphology and their temporal information, and their incorporation in total-evidence phylogenetics is necessary to faithfully reconstruct evolutionary history.

1 July 2014 in Cladistics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NKNicolás Mongiardino Koch
Nicolás Mongiardino Koch
ISIgnacio M. Soto
Ignacio M. Soto
MRMartín J. Ramírez
Martín J. Ramírez

13 December 2018 in BMC Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNicolás Mongiardino Koch
Nicolás Mongiardino Koch
SCSimon E. Coppard
Simon E. Coppard
HLHarilaos A. Lessios
Harilaos A. Lessios
DBDerek Briggs
Derek Briggs
RMRich Mooi
Rich Mooi
Greg RouseGreg Rouse
Greg Rouse
Echinoidea is a clade of marine animals including sea urchins, heart urchins, sand dollars and sea biscuits. Found in benthic habitats across all latitudes, echinoids are key components of marine communities such as coral reefs and kelp forests. A little over 1000 species inhabit the oceans today, a diversity that traces its roots back at least to the Permian. Although much effort has been devoted to elucidating the echinoid tree of life using a variety of morphological data, molecular attempts have relied on only a handful of genes. Both of these approaches have had limited success at resolving the deepest nodes of the tree, and their disagreement over the positions of a number of clades remains unresolved. We performed de novo sequencing and assembly of 17 transcriptomes to complement available genomic resources of sea urchins and produce the first phylogenomic analysis of the clade. Multiple methods of probabilistic inference recovered identical topologies, with virtually all nodes showing maximum support. In contrast, the coalescent-based method ASTRAL-II resolved one node differently, a result apparently driven by gene tree error induced by evolutionary rate heterogeneity. Regardless of the method employed, our phylogenetic structure deviates from the currently accepted classification of echinoids, with neither Acroechinoidea (all euechinoids except echinothurioids), nor Clypeasteroida (sand dollars and sea biscuits) being monophyletic as currently defined. We show that phylogenetic signal for novel resolutions of these lineages is strong and distributed throughout the genome, and fail to recover systematic biases as drivers of our results. Our investigation substantially augments the molecular resources available for sea urchins, providing the first transcriptomes for many of its main lineages. Using this expanded genomic dataset, we resolve the position of several clades in agreement with early molecular analyses but in disagreement with morphological data. Our efforts settle multiple phylogenetic uncertainties, including the position of the enigmatic deep-sea echinothurioids and the identity of the sister clade to sand dollars. We offer a detailed assessment of evolutionary scenarios that could reconcile our findings with morphological evidence, opening up new lines of research into the development and evolutionary history of this ancient clade.

11 September 2017 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MFMatteo Fabbri
Matteo Fabbri
NKNicolás Mongiardino Koch
Nicolás Mongiardino Koch
APAdam C. Pritchard
Adam C. Pritchard
MHMichael Hanson
Michael Hanson
EHEva Hoffman
Eva Hoffman
BBBhart-Anjan S. Bhullar
Bhart-Anjan S. Bhullar

15 February 2018 in Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RARoss P. Anderson
Ross P. Anderson
NTNicholas J. Tosca
Nicholas J. Tosca
RGRobert R. Gaines
Robert R. Gaines
NKNicolás Mongiardino Koch
Nicolás Mongiardino Koch
DBDerek E.G. Briggs
Derek E.G. Briggs
Burgess Shale–type (BST) fossilization of carbonaceous remains that are ordinarily lost to decay is critical to our understanding of the early evolution of complex life. Sediment composition, particularly the abundance of certain clay minerals, has been invoked as a significant factor in BST fossilization. X-ray diffraction data for 213 Cambrian shales from 19 sedimentary successions on four continents provide the first comprehensive test of the association of clay mineral assemblages with BST fossils. Samples containing BST fossils yield mineralogical compositions that form a subset within the range represented by samples containing only fossil mineralized skeletons. Logistic regression and classification tree methods reveal that BST fossils are more likely to be found in sediments rich in berthierine/chamosite and poor in celadonite and illite. This characteristic clay mineralogy probably reflects a high kaolinite/smectite ratio in the original sediment and enhanced iron availability during early diagenesis. Models derived from both methods can predict the occurrence of BST fossils in fossiliferous samples based on clay mineralogy with ~80% accuracy, providing a mineralogical signature that may be useful in refining the search for BST fossils on Earth and beyond.