Background and Objectives: Although the effectiveness of remote monitoring (RM) has been extensively studied, a focus on the post-pandemic time period is needed given the social changes and technology advances since this global event occurred. Aim: The present paper responds to this need by reviewing post-pandemic research, to determine if RM of patients with heart failure (HF) using non-implantable devices represents an effective strategy. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed and PMC, and the number of articles included was 19. Results: A total of 3,031 patients participated in the 19 studies in this review, who had HF (NYHA class I–IV). Most frequent outcomes of interest were: rates of hospitalization (13 studies), death (5 studies), adherence to medications / healthy behaviors (4 studies), associated costs (4 studies), symptom intensity or frequency (3 studies), etc. The studies included in this review unanimously presented significant findings in favor of RM. Conclusion: The post-pandemic research targeting RM of patients with HF presents more homogenous results to support this type of intervention, as compared to the heterogeneity of the pre-pandemic research.

Epidemiological studies indicate that heart failure (HF) prevalence and associated mortality are significantly higher among Eastern European countries as compared to their Western European counterparts. The significant financial burden on the healthcare system matches these sobering data. Thus, efficient programs for patients with HF have been called for. N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) represents a widely used, cost-effective, and readily available test that can be used to evaluate HF risk. However, it should not be used as a universal assessment, given the existing variability in proposed cut-off scores for various subgroups of patients. Thus, the clinical context needs to always be considered, and alternative diagnoses need to be ruled out. Based upon evidence from the literature for the above assumptions, the advantages and limitations of using NT-proBNP in primary care settings, along with other HF diagnostic modalities, are discussed in this paper. Also, this paper argues that an effective primary care network, in collaboration with specialist providers, may avoid a delay in HF diagnoses, may help provide on-time treatments, and may ultimately cut unnecessary healthcare expenditures associated with HF hospitalizations. Therefore, the present paper proposes an algorithm for diagnosing HF in primary care settings and discusses specific knowledge and skills that family physicians should be well equipped with in order to successfully respond to the needs of their patients with HF.

Background/Objectives: Pre-discharge NT-proBNP levels may serve as a helpful tool in the algorithm of assessing the long-term risk of mortality after a hospitalization for symptomatic heart failure (HF). The goals were: (a) to identify a cut-off for NT-proBNP concentrations for predicting the two-year all-cause mortality in our sample of patients, and (b) to identify risk factors associated with NT-proBNP concentrations being higher than this cut-off. Methods: The present prospective study included 96 patients diagnosed with symptomatic HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, who were followed for up to 2 years post-hospital discharge. Results: Levels of pre-discharge NT-proBNP were found to be predictive of all-cause mortality. We determined that an NT-proBNP cut-off score of 8700 pg/mL may predict with 75.8% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity a 4.6-fold increase in mortality risk over a period of two years in our study sample, 95% CI (2–10.8), p = 0.001. Predictors of NT-proBNP concentrations > 8700 pg/mL included: older age, OR 4.73, 95% CI (1.74–12.85), p = 0.002; lack of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) treatment, OR 0.3, 95% CI (0.12–0.74), p = 0.009; low systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission, OR 3.4, 95% CI (1.36–8.49), p = 0.009; and low serum hemoglobin at admission, OR 3.2, 95% CI (1.38–7.46), p = 0.007. Conclusions: NT-proBNP may serve as a helpful tool for predicting mortality after an episode of HF decompensation, thus allowing the implementation of appropriate long-term monitoring and treatment. Particular attention should be paid to older patients without ACE-I medication, who had SBP < 120 mmHg at admission, and/or low levels of serum hemoglobin—as these patients are more likely to have pre-discharge NT-proBNP concentrations higher than the cut-off. These findings have implications for the long-term community follow-up of patients with HF.