David Hecht

Prof. David Hecht

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2007 in Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPaul J. Pockros
Paul J. Pockros
ESEugene R. Schiff
Eugene R. Schiff
MSMitchell L. Shiffman
Mitchell L. Shiffman
JMJohn G. McHutchison
John G. McHutchison
RGRobert G. Gish
Robert G. Gish
DSDavid A. Shapiro
David A. Shapiro

1 April 1993 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDavid Hecht
David Hecht
LTLema Tadesse
Lema Tadesse
LWLee Walters
Lee Walters

14 August 2015 in Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSDavis E. Smith
Davis E. Smith
IMIsaac Marquez
Isaac Marquez
MLMelissa E. Lokensgard
Melissa E. Lokensgard
ARArnold L. Rheingold
Arnold L. Rheingold
DHDavid Hecht
David Hecht
JGJeffrey L. Gustafson
Jeffrey L. Gustafson

30 June 2016 in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJessica K. Bell
Jessica K. Bell
TETodd T. Eckdahl
Todd T. Eckdahl
DHDavid Hecht
David Hecht
PKPatrick J. Killion
Patrick J. Killion
JLJoachim Latzer
Joachim Latzer
JBJ. Ellis Bell
J. Ellis Bell
Integration of research experience into classroom is an important and vital experience for all undergraduates. These course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have grown from independent instructor lead projects to large consortium driven experiences. The impact and importance of CUREs on students at all levels in biochemistry was the focus of a National Science Foundation funded think tank. The state of biochemistry CUREs and suggestions for moving biochemistry forward as well as a practical guide (supplementary material) are reported here. © 2016 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 45(1):7–12, 2017.

1 March 2009 in Current Computer-Aided Drug Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDavid Hecht
David Hecht
GFGary B. Fogel
Gary B. Fogel
Abstract: Computer-aided drug design (CADD) methodologies have proven to be very effective, greatly enhancing the efficiency of small molecule drug discovery and development processes. These methods include quantitative structureactivity relationship and pharmacophore models, quantitative structure-property relationship models, as well as in silico docking studies. While docking studies very often correctly identify the binding mode of a ligand, they have reduced success in predicting binding affinities. Development of improved and more efficient strategies for scoring binding affinity is a very active area of research. Here we review the utility of computational intelligence approaches such as artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and evolutionary computation to the calculation of improved docking scores.

6 April 2009 in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDavid Hecht
David Hecht
GFGary B. Fogel
Gary B. Fogel