Background Deep penetrating nevus (DPN) is not a widely recognised lesion on the conjunctiva and only a few cases consistent with combined DPN have been reported. Methods A review of all excised and histopathologically diagnosed conjunctival melanocytic lesions between 2003 and 2018 was performed in order to identify melanocytic nevi morphologically consistent with DPN. Results Thirty-four DPN were identified among 361 histopathologically examined conjunctival nevi (9.4%), including 33 (97%) combined with a common nevus and 1 (3%) pure DPN. The patients’ age ranged from 7 to 51 years (median, 22 years). Clinically, 21 of 29 (72%) lesions with available data were darkly pigmented, and an increase in size and/or pigmentation was noted in 13 of 18 (72%) lesions with known history. All 24 lesions in which an immunohistochemical analysis was possible were diffusely positive for BRAFV600E (in DPN and common nevus components) and showed a diffuse nuclear positivity for beta catenin and cyclin D1 in the DPN component. None of the 21 lesions with available follow-up data recurred during a follow-up period from 0.3 to 16.3 years (median, 7.5 years). Conclusions DPN of the conjunctiva is a relatively common lesion and usually presents as a combined nevus. Genetically, DPN of the conjunctiva are characterised by a combination of BRAFV600E mutation and activation of the beta catenin pathway. Recognition of DPN of the conjunctiva is important in order not to overdiagnose it as a melanoma, and to explain its potential atypical clinical features. DPN of the conjunctiva seems to be a benign lesion.

Background: There is growing evidence that the Spitz group of melanocytic neoplasms should be restricted to those harboring kinase receptor fusions and HRAS mutations/11p15 amplification. The presence of genomic alterations characteristic of conventional melanomas (BRAF and NRAS mutations) precludes a diagnosis of a Spitz neoplasm. It is often challenging to distinguish Spitz neoplasms from conventional melanomas with spitzoid morphology on histopathological grounds alone.Methods: We report a series of 70 consecutive melanocytic tumors in which targeted sequencing was indicated to distinguish Spitz from spitzoid neoplasms and to classify Spitz neoplasms along the biological spectrum.Results: Final diagnoses incorporating molecular results included 12 conventional melanomas (nine of which with NRAS mutations), five Spitz melanomas, 35 atypical Spitz tumors, eight Spitz nevi, three melanocytic tumors with a MAP2K1 mutation, and seven desmoplastic Spitz nevi/tumors. There were significant discrepancies between initial diagnoses and final diagnoses after incorporating molecular results in 24 (34%) cases, including nine conventional melanomas favored to be Spitz neoplasms and nine Spitz neoplasms favored to be conventional melanomas.Conclusions: It is often not possible to reliably distinguish Spitz neoplasms from spitzoid melanocytic tumors without identifying their driver genomic alterations. Applying next‐generation sequencing in diagnostically problematic tumors improves diagnostic accuracy.

Chondromyxoid fibroma (CMF) is a rare benign bone tumour. While CMF located entirely on the surface of a bone (i.e. juxtacortical CMF) has been well characterised, CMF has not so far been convincingly documented to arise in soft tissues without connection to an underlying bone.We report a subcutaneous CMF in a 34-year-old male, located on the distal medial aspect of the right thigh without any connection with the femur. The tumour measured 15 mm, it was well-circumscribed and displayed typical morphological features of a CMF. At the periphery, there was a small area of metaplastic bone. Immunohistochemically, the tumour cells were diffusely positive for smooth muscle actin and GRM1, and negative for S100 protein, desmin and cytokeratin AE1AE3. Whole transcriptome sequencing revealed a novel PNISR::GRM1 gene fusion.Our case indicates that CMF should be included in the differential diagnosis of soft tissue (including subcutaneous) tumours composed of spindle/ovoid cells, with a lobular architecture and chondromyxoid matrix. The diagnosis of CMF arising in soft tissues can be confirmed by identifying a GRM1 gene fusion or GRM1 expression by immunohistochemistry.