Anja Imsirovic

Dr. Anja Imsirovic

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Annals of Medicine & Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSumit Sood
Sumit Sood
AIAnja Imsirovic
Anja Imsirovic
PSParv Sains
Parv Sains
KSKrishna K Singh
Krishna K Singh
MSMuhammad S Sajid
Muhammad S Sajid
The objective of this article is to compare the surgical outcomes for epigastric port or umbilical port retrieval of the gallbladder (GB) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The data retrieved from the published randomized, controlled trials (RCT) comparing the surgical outcomes for epigastric port or umbilical port retrieval of the GB following LC was analysed using the principles of meta-analysis. The summated outcome of continuous variables was expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and dichotomous data was presented in odds ratio (OR). Eight RCTs on 2676 patients comparing the surgical outcomes for epigastric port or umbilical port retrieval of the GB following LC were analysed. In the random effects model analysis using the statistical software Review Manager 5.3, the GB retrieval through epigastric port was associated with the reduced duration of operation (SMD, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18, 0.64; z = 3.52; P = 0.0004). Epigastric retrieval was also associated with reduced risk of surgical site infection (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.75, 5.11; z = 1.36; P = 0.17), and port site incisional hernia (OR, 4.22; 95% CI, 0.43, 41.40; z = 1.24; P = 0.22) compared to umbilical port retrieval though it did not reach statistical significance. The need for port enlargement to retrieve the GB was similar in both groups. In contrast, the umbilical port retrieval of the GB was associated with significantly less post-operative pain (SMD, -0.51; 95% CI, -0.95, -0.06; z = 2.24; P = 0.03), reduced GB perforation rate, reduced port site bleeding rate and reduced difficulty in GB retrieval. GB retrieval through epigastric port following LC has clinically proven advantage of reduced retrieval site infection rate, lower operation time and incisional hernia rate but at the cost of increased pain at 24 h, higher risk of GB perforation, port site bleeding and technical difficulties.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ines SchoberleitnerInes Schoberleitner
Ines Schoberleitner
Michaela LacknerMichaela Lackner
Michaela Lackner
Débora C. Coraça-HuberDébora C. Coraça-Huber
Débora C. Coraça-Huber
AAAngela Augustin
Angela Augustin
AIAnja Imsirovic
Anja Imsirovic
Dolores WolframDolores Wolfram
Dolores Wolfram
Silicone mammary implants (SMIs) frequently result in capsular fibrosis, which is marked by the overproduction of fibrous tissue surrounding the implant. This review provides a detailed examination of the molecular and immunological mechanisms driving capsular fibrosis, focusing on the role of foreign body responses (FBRs) and microbial biofilm formation. We investigate how microbial adhesion to implant surfaces and biofilm development contribute to persistent inflammation and fibrotic responses. The review critically evaluates antimicrobial strategies, including preoperative antiseptic protocols and antimicrobial-impregnated materials, designed to mitigate infection and biofilm-related complications. Additionally, advancements in material science, such as surface modifications and antibiotic-impregnated meshes, are discussed for their potential to reduce capsular fibrosis and prevent contracture of the capsule. By integrating molecular insights with clinical applications, this review aims to elucidate the current understanding of SMI-related fibrotic responses and highlight knowledge gaps. The synthesis of these findings aims to guide future research directions of improved antimicrobial interventions and implant materials, ultimately advancing the management of capsular fibrosis and enhancing patient outcomes.

11 November 2024 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ines SchoberleitnerInes Schoberleitner
Ines Schoberleitner
KFKlaus Faserl
Klaus Faserl
Michaela LacknerMichaela Lackner
Michaela Lackner
Débora C. Coraça-HuberDébora C. Coraça-Huber
Débora C. Coraça-Huber
AAAngela Augustin
Angela Augustin
Dolores WolframDolores Wolfram
Dolores Wolfram
Breast implant surgery has evolved significantly, yet challenges such as capsular contracture remain a persistent concern. This review presents an in-depth analysis of recent advancements in understanding the immune mechanisms and clinical implications associated with silicone mammary implants (SMIs). The article systematically examines the complex interplay between immune responses and capsular fibrosis, emphasizing the pathophysiological mechanisms of inflammation in the etiology of this fibrotic response. It discusses innovations in biomaterial science, including the development of novel anti-biofilm coatings and immunomodulatory surfaces designed to enhance implant integration and minimize complications. Emphasis is placed on personalized risk assessment strategies, leveraging molecular insights to tailor interventions and improve patient outcomes. Emerging therapeutic targets, advancements in surgical techniques, and the refinement of post-operative care are also explored. Despite notable progress, challenges such as the variability in immune responses, the long-term efficacy of new interventions, and ethical considerations remain. Future research directions are identified, focusing on personalized medicine, advanced biomaterials, and bridging preclinical findings with clinical applications. As we advance from bench to bedside, this review illuminates the path forward, where interdisciplinary collaboration and continued inquiry weave together to enhance the art and science of breast implant surgery, transforming patient care into a realm of precision and excellence.

9 October 2024 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Ines SchoberleitnerInes Schoberleitner
Ines Schoberleitner
KFKlaus Faserl
Klaus Faserl
Michaela LacknerMichaela Lackner
Michaela Lackner
Débora C. Coraça-HuberDébora C. Coraça-Huber
Débora C. Coraça-Huber
AAAngela Augustin
Angela Augustin
Dolores WolframDolores Wolfram
Dolores Wolfram
Breast implant surgery has evolved significantly, yet challenges such as capsular contracture remain a persistent concern. This review presents an in-depth analysis of recent advancements in understanding the immune mechanisms and clinical implications associated with breast implants. The article systematically examines the complex interplay between immune responses and capsular fibrosis, emphasizing the pathophysiological mechanisms of inflammation in the etiology of this fibrotic response. It discusses innovations in biomaterial science, including the development of novel anti-biofilm coatings and immunomodulatory surfaces designed to enhance implant integration and minimize complications. Emphasis is placed on personalized risk assessment strategies, leveraging molecular insights to tailor interventions and improve patient outcomes. Emerging therapeutic targets, advancements in surgical techniques, and the refinement of post-operative care are also explored. Despite notable progress, challenges such as variability in immune responses, long-term efficacy of new interventions, and ethical considerations remain. Future research directions are identified, focusing on personalized medicine, advanced biomaterials, and bridging preclinical findings with clinical applications. As we advance from bench to bedside, this review illuminates the path forward, where interdisciplinary collaboration and continued inquiry weave together to enhance the art and science of breast implant surgery, transforming patient care into a realm of precision and excellence.

10 October 2024 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Ines SchoberleitnerInes Schoberleitner
Ines Schoberleitner
Michaela LacknerMichaela Lackner
Michaela Lackner
Débora C. Coraça-HuberDébora C. Coraça-Huber
Débora C. Coraça-Huber
AAAngela Augustin
Angela Augustin
AIAnja Imsirovic
Anja Imsirovic
Dolores WolframDolores Wolfram
Dolores Wolfram
Silicone mammary implants (SMIs) frequently result in capsular fibrosis, which is marked by the overproduction of fibrous tissue surrounding the implant. This review provides a detailed examination of the molecular and immunological mechanisms driving capsular fibrosis, focusing on the role of foreign body responses (FBR) and microbial biofilm formation. We investigate how microbial adhesion to implant surfaces and biofilm development contribute to persistent inflammation and fibrotic responses. The review critically evaluates antimicrobial strategies, including preoperative antiseptic protocols and antimicrobial-impregnated materials, designed to mitigate infection and biofilm-related complications. Additionally, advancements in material science, such as surface modifications and antibiotic-impregnated meshes, are discussed for their potential to reduce capsular fibrosis and prevent contracture of the capsule. By integrating molecular insights with clinical applications, this review aims to elucidate the current understanding of SMI-related fibrotic responses and highlight knowledge gaps. The synthesis of these findings aims to guide future research directions of improved antimicrobial interventions and implant materials, ultimately advancing the management of capsular fibrosis and enhancing patient outcomes.

1 May 2021 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AIAnja Imsirovic
Anja Imsirovic
TWT J Walton
T J Walton
PDP J H Drake
P J H Drake
EGE Guryel
E Guryel
Introduction: Open fractures are associated with increased infection rates and the evidence shows timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics within one hour of injury improves the outcomes. Method: A multi-cycle audit was carried out retrospectively for patients presenting to Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (BSUH) with an open limb fracture in 2018-2020. Targeted teaching was carried out for orthopaedic trainees, prompt posters created and alterations to the trauma clerking proforma were implemented. Results: In first cycle, 48 (92.3%) out of total 52 patients were prescribed antibiotics prior to definitive surgical management, with a mean time to administration of 271 minutes. Of these, 41 (78.8%) received prescriptions according to BSUH guidelines. The use of STAT ‘once-only’ prescriptions was found to significantly reduce the mean time to administration for 154 minutes. In second cycle, all of 29 patients (100%) were prescribed antibiotics prior to definitive surgical management, with a reduced mean time to administration (233 minutes). Of these, 26 (89.7%) received prescriptions according to BSUH guidelines, and a significantly greater proportion received initial STAT prescriptions (51.7% vs. 15.4%). Conclusions: This quality improvement project has demonstrated the successful implementation of targeted changes to improve the attainment of BOAST 4 guidelines.