Stephanie Tomscha

Dr. Stephanie Tomscha

Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 December 2017 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDalal E. L. Hanna
Dalal E. L. Hanna
Stephanie TomschaStephanie Tomscha
Stephanie Tomscha
CDCamille Ouellet Dallaire
Camille Ouellet Dallaire
EBElena M. Bennett
Elena M. Bennett

1 January 2016 in Ecology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stephanie TomschaStephanie Tomscha
Stephanie Tomscha
Sarah GergelSarah Gergel
Sarah Gergel
Tomscha, S. A., and S. E. Gergel. 2016. Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history. Ecology and Society 21(1):43.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08345-210143

27 July 2016 in BioScience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stephanie TomschaStephanie Tomscha
Stephanie Tomscha
ISIra J. Sutherland
Ira J. Sutherland
DRDelphine Renard
Delphine Renard
SGSarah E. Gergel
Sarah E. Gergel
JRJeanine M. Rhemtulla
Jeanine M. Rhemtulla
ECEmily E. Clark
Emily E. Clark
Ecosystem services (ES) span the interface of social and ecological systems, which makes them inherently challenging to measure. Tracking ES patterns over long time frames is crucial for understanding slow variables and complex interactions, but long-term studies of ES are rare. Historical records can play an important role in revealing temporal patterns of ES, but because they rarely measure ES directly, historical ES reconstruction presents new practical challenges. Furthermore, long-term data are limited in availability, quality, and structure. We review the utility, strengths, and challenges of some unconventional historical data sets with the potential for long-term ES tracking (e.g., aerial photography, oral history, tree rings.). We link each type of data to a simple ES framework that distinguishes ES capacity, ES flows, and ES demand. Using multiple historical data sets in parallel may enhance our understanding of ES sustainability and ES interactions.

21 March 2017 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stephanie TomschaStephanie Tomscha
Stephanie Tomscha
SGSarah E. Gergel
Sarah E. Gergel
MTMatthew J. Tomlinson
Matthew J. Tomlinson
River‐floodplains are hotspots for many ecosystem services (ES), and thus, understanding how these services are spatially organized along river systems is essential. General principles from river‐floodplain ecology may provide guidance for understanding these spatial patterns, yet such concepts have rarely been incorporated into spatial assessments of ES. Using a lens of riverine concepts, we contrasted how floodplain ES capacity and diversity (orchard production, forage production, carbon storage, paddle route quality, fish capacity) vary with longitudinal river‐floodplain position. High spatial resolution aerial photography (2006) facilitated detection of floodplain features contributing to the production of ES. We also determined how river reach types are linked to production of ES. We found that ES capacity varied considerably with longitudinal position and reach type. Agricultural capacity was concentrated in lower reaches, high‐quality paddle routes in middle‐lower reaches, and fish capacity and carbon storage in upper reaches. Furthermore, the highest diversity of ES was concentrated in the lowland floodplain reaches. Our results suggest river‐floodplain concepts can improve spatial assessments of ES, increase our understanding of the relationships among biological features and ES, and thus help us better manage some of the key ES trade‐offs.

4 February 2021 in Ecosystems and People
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Stephanie TomschaStephanie Tomscha
Stephanie Tomscha
SBShannon Bentley
Shannon Bentley
EPElsie Platzer
Elsie Platzer
BJBethanna Jackson
Bethanna Jackson
MRMairead de Roiste
Mairead de Roiste
Julie DeslippeJulie Deslippe
Julie Deslippe
Global wetland loss has reduced biodiversity and ecosystem services. These declines have inspired many landholders to restore wetlands, but the success of these efforts remains unclear, in part, because quantifying ecosystem services requires diverse methods. Here, we blend participatory mapping and surveys, field measurements and high-resolution models to track ecosystem services from restored wetlands on private land. We ask: 1) What ecosystem services do people perceive from restored wetlands? 2) What modelled/field measured ecosystem services were enhanced through restoration? and 3) How do field measured, modelled and perceived ecosystem services in restored wetlands interact? Participating landholders mapped their restoration project and shared their perceptions of ecosystem services. Next, we modelled ecosystem service changes using the Land Use Capability Indicator (LUCI) model and contrasted these to field measured ecosystem services for each wetland. Landholders perceived ~6.5 services from their restored wetlands. For modelled services, restoration significantly enhanced nitrogen and phosphorous retention. For field-measured services, restoration increased soil organic carbon by ~20%, soil permeability to water by ~27% and native plant species richness by ~15 species, while reducing plant-available phosphorous by ~23%. Correlating across methods revealed that reduced plant-available phosphorus and site age and size were associated with more perceived services, whereas an increase in plant species richness was not a good proxy for gains in measured, modelled or perceived services. Based on the diverse ecosystem services gained, demonstrated by multiple methods, we contend that private wetland restoration can be successful as well as leveraged to meet multiple management and policy objectives.

7 December 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NDNguyet Anh Dang
Nguyet Anh Dang
RBRubianca Benavidez
Rubianca Benavidez
Stephanie TomschaStephanie Tomscha
Stephanie Tomscha
Ho NguyenHo Nguyen
Ho Nguyen
Dung TranDung Tran
Dung Tran
BJBethanna Marie Jackson
Bethanna Marie Jackson
Deltas are among the most productive and diverse global ecosystems. However, these regions are highly vulnerable to natural disasters and climate change. Nature-based solutions (Nbs) have been increasingly adopted in many deltas to improve their resilience. Among decision support tools, assessment of ecosystem services (ES) through spatially explicit modelling plays an important role in advocating for Nbs. This study explores the use of the Land Utilisation and Capability Indicator (LUCI) model, a high-resolution model originally developed in temperate hill country regions, to map changes in multiple ecosystem services (ES), along with their synergies and trade-offs, between 2010 and 2018 in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta (VMD). In so doing, this study contributes to the current knowledge in at least two aspects: high-resolution ES modelling in the VMD, and the combination of ES biophysical and economic values within the VMD to support Nbs implementation. To date, this is the highest resolution (5 by 5 m) ES modelling study ever conducted in the VMD, with ~1500 million elements generated per ES. In the process of trialling implementations of LUCI within the VMD’s unique environmental conditions and data contexts, we identify and suggest potential model enhancements to make the LUCI model more applicable to the VMD as well as other tropical deltaic regions. LUCI generated informative results in much of the VMD for the selected ES (flood mitigation, agriculture/aquaculture productivity, and climate regulation), but challenges arose around its application to a new agro-hydrological regime. To address these challenges, parameterising LUCI and reconceptualising some of the model’s mechanisms to specifically account for the productivity and flood mitigation capability of water-tolerant crops as well as flooding processes of deltaic regions will improve future ES modelling in tropical deltaic areas. The ES maps showed the spatial heterogeneity of ES across the VMD. Next, to at least somewhat account for the economic drivers which need to be considered alongside biophysical valuations for practical implementations of ES maps for nature-based solutions (Nbs) in the upstream VMD, economic values were assigned to different parcels using a benefit transfer approach. The spatially explicit ES economic value maps can inform the design of financing incentives for Nbs. The results and related work can be used to support the establishment of Nbs that ultimately contribute to the security of local farmers’ livelihoods and the sustainability of the VMD.