ALTHOUGH BREAST implant rupture is a well-known complication of breast implant surgery, little is known about the timing and frequency of ruptures.
1 In Europe, silicone breast implants are still the preferred implants for cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery, whereas in the United States saline implants have been standard since 1992, when the use of silicone gel implants was restricted to patients enrolled in clinical trials.
2 Rupture of saline implants becomes apparent shortly after its occurrence due to absorption of the leaking saline. By contrast, silicone gel implant rupture often remains unnoticed by both patient and physician because the leaking silicone is kept in place by the surrounding fibrous scar membrane and no visible reabsorption occurs.
3,4 Several clinical studies have estimated the prevalence of implant rupture based on findings at explantation,
5-13 and attempts to estimate implant survival based on pooling of explantation data have been made.
14-17 However, because these studies are mainly based on symptomatic women seeking surgery, they constitute a biased selection of women with breast implants, presumably resulting in overestimation of rupture frequency. Recently, 2 studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women with cosmetic silicone breast implants, randomly selected from larger cohorts of women with implants, reported rupture prevalences of 26% for implants with a median time in situ of 12 years
4 and 55% for implants with a median time in situ of 16.4 years.
18 However, rupture prevalence can only be used, at best, as a surrogate measure for incidence,
19 and to our knowledge no study has directly examined the incidence rate of implant rupture.