The collateral damage caused by COVID-19 pandemic-associated public health and governmental measures on patient care has been increasingly assessed in various oncological and non-oncological clinical settings. In order to investigate potential adverse effects in the field of melanoma the present study analyzed the characteristics of primary melanoma diagnoses at an Austrian dermato-pathological referral center before, during, and after the first coronavirus-related lockdown in March 2020. As suspected, we found significant temporary reductions in the number of newly diagnosed melanomas in 2020 compared to previous years, in particular, during the first lockdown period.
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) accounts for 80% of skin cancer cases. Although mostly curable by simple excision, the treatment of advanced disease can be challenging, as curative surgery or radiotherapy may not always be feasible. The scope of this review is to summarize current knowledge on molecular mechanisms in BCC pathogenesis, to elaborate on the definition of advanced/difficult-to-treat BCC, and to outline systemic treatment options. Particularly, pivotal trial data of the approved hedgehog inhibitors (HHI) sonidegib and vismodegib are compared. Concluding, we provide an overview of novel, particularly neoadjuvant and combined treatment approaches, both with hedgehog and immune-checkpoint inhibitors.
20 November 2024 in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are considered standard‐of‐care in the systemic treatment of melanoma. However, management of certain ICI‐associated adverse events (AE) can be challenging. Incidence, course and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor‐induced pancreatic injury (ICIPI) are not well‐documented and specific diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms are lacking. Current management includes serological monitoring of pancreatic enzymes, radiographic imaging and corticosteroid or further immunosuppressive treatment. Objectives: Based on previous data regarding adjuvant ICI treatment, we suspected that elevation of pancreatic enzymes may occur more frequently than reported while the clinical relevance of—particularly asymptomatic—ICIPI is still unclear.Methods: A collaboration of eight Austrian and Swiss dermato‐oncology centres was established to retrospectively analyse a large cohort of ICI‐treated patients regarding incidence and management of ICIPI. Additionally, a questionnaire‐based survey concerning ICIPI‐management was conducted.Results: Among 1516 melanoma patients receiving ICI therapy, 204 patients exhibited ≥CTCAE II° lipase elevation. Of these patients, 41 (20.1%) had symptoms suggestive of pancreatitis. Immunotherapy was interrupted or discontinued due to pancreatic AE in almost half of the patients. Systemic corticosteroids were administered in 103 patients (50.5%), with higher doses reported in symptomatic cases. Six per cent of asymptomatic patients had radiographically proven pancreatitis. Maximum lipase elevation was >5xULN in all of these patients.Conclusions: Routine lipase monitoring was conducted in all participating centres, although not recommended in respective guidelines. Elevation of serum lipase was observed more frequently than recently reported. Although radiographic findings indicating pancreatitis were rare in asymptomatic patients, ICI treatment was frequently paused or discontinued and systemic steroids were administered. To reduce the existing uncertainty in routine clinical practice reflected by our findings, we provide an algorithm to guide the monitoring and management of potential pancreatic adverse events. Lipase measurement should be limited to symptomatic patients and/or those with radiographic findings indicative of pancreatic injury.
Melanoma ranks as the fifth most common solid cancer in adults worldwide and is responsible for a significant proportion of skin-tumor-related deaths. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition with anti-programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies has revolutionized the adjuvant treatment of high-risk, completely resected stage III/IV melanoma. However, not all patients benefit equally. Current strategies for improving outcomes involve adjuvant treatment in earlier disease stages (IIB/C) as well as perioperative treatment approaches. Interfering with T-cell exhaustion to counteract cancer immune evasion and the immunogenic nature of melanoma is key for anti-PD-1 effectiveness. Yet, the biological rationale for the efficacy of adjuvant treatment in clinically tumor-free patients remains to be fully elucidated. High-dose intermittent sun exposure (sunburn) is a well-known primary risk factor for melanomagenesis. Also, ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced immunosuppression may impair anti-cancer immune surveillance. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about adjuvant anti-PD-1 blockade, including a characterization of the main cell types most likely responsible for its efficacy. In conclusion, we propose that local and systemic immunosuppression, to some extent UVR-mediated, can be restored by adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy, consequently boosting anti-melanoma immune surveillance and the elimination of residual melanoma cell clones.
11 March 2025 in JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
Drug hypersensitivity reactions are dose-independent, unpredictable, and immune-mediated type B adverse drug reactions (ADR) in patients sensitized to a certain drug [1]. The first signs appear within minutes to hours of drug intake, ranging from low-grade to possibly life-threatening...