To determine whether self-reported maximal and daily activity levels are impaired among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B (HBV). Clinicodemographic, diagnostic, self-report and standard laboratory data were obtained. Univariate, multivariate and regression analyses were performed comparing group maximal (Maximum Activity Score [MAS]) and daily activity scores (Adjusted Activity Score [AAS]), adjusted for age and gender. Two hundred twenty-two patients completed activity-level self-reports (mean age [52.4 ± 10.0 years], BMI [28.3 ± 6.58], 31.2% NAFLD, 48.3% HCV, 20.3% HBV). On multivariate analysis, significantly higher MAS (p < 0.05) and AAS in HBV patients correlated with absence of cirrhosis, younger age, male gender (higher MAS) and lower BMI (higher AAS). Lowest activity levels were found primarily in obese patients (p < 0.009). Compared with population norms, NAFLD and HCV cohorts scored mildly disabled on MAS; the HBV cohort scored low normal. Mild disability on AAS was observed in patients with HBV; moderate disability in those with NAFLD, HCV. All groups had significantly lower activity levels than population norms. Nonobese patients showed significantly less disability than obese patients. Patients with NAFLD and HCV are likely to have lower levels than those with HBV without cirrhosis. This presents an additional risk factor for disability and mortality. • Hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients had significantly lower activity levels than expected for their age and gender, as measured by the Human Activity Profile (HAP). • Overweight and normal weight chronic liver disease (CLD) patients showed significantly less disability than obese chronic liver disease patients. • Patients with NAFLD and HCV are likely to participate in low levels of activity that require fewer metabolic equivalents for completion, adding an additional risk factor for disability and mortality. • Targeting low activity level in CLD patients, and decreasing BMI below the obesity threshold, may reduce disability and risk of mortality.

Objective: The aim of the study is to identify the impact of postacute SARS-CoV-2 infection on patient outcomes. Design: This is a prospective, repeated measure, observational study of consented adults with positive SARS-CoV-2 quantitative polymerase chain reaction or antigen test more than 28 days after infection. Only data from the initial study visit are reported, including disease history, symptoms checklist, patient questionnaires, cognitive tests, social/medical histories, vitals, grip strength, and 2-min walk distance. Results: Two hundred eighteen patients were studied: 100 hospitalized (57.3 ± 15.4 yrs, 62% male, body mass index: 31.3 ± 8.0) and 118 nonhospitalized (46.2 ± 14.6 yrs, 31% male, body mass index: 29.7 ± 7.5). Post-COVID patients reported mean 1.76 symptoms; ≥15% reported fatigue, memory loss, and shortness of breath. Grip strength was 14% lower than norms (P < 0.0001). Fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue), mood (Patient Health Questionnaire), and well-being (EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level) scores were lower than the population norms (P < 0.05). Hospitalized versus nonhospitalized post-COVID patients performed worse on cognitive assessments (processing speed test—Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition Symbol Search) and reported less regular exercise (≥30 mins ≥3× per week; P < 0.05). In addition, 30% had severe fatigue (by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue); those patients reported less exercise (P < 0.05). In multivariate models, lack of exercise was independently associated with multiple post–COVID-19 impairments. Conclusions: Low levels of exercise are an independent risk factor for post-COVID sequelae. Patients who report less exercise have low grip strength, higher levels of fatigue, memory loss, shortness of breath, depression, and poorer quality of life.

Introduction: Many with post-acute SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) have persistent symptoms impacting physical and cognitive function, decreased health and health-related life quality. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment was available to acutely infected patients which might improve these outcomes. Purpose: To compare patient perception of PASC symptoms for those receiving bamlanivimab or casirivimab and imdevimab (mAbs) to those not receiving this treatment (non-mAbs). To compare changes between these groups in symptoms, function and quality of life over a 6-month follow-up. Patients and Methods: Consented adults > 28 days post-infection with positive SARS-CoV-2 qPCR or antigen test and SARS-CoV-2 infection between March of 2020 and July of 2022 were enrolled. This prospective, repeated measure observational study reports baseline through 6-month follow-up. Extensive sociodemographic data, detailed medical history, COVID-19 symptom history, and standardized measures of well-being, depression, anxiety, stigma, cognition, symptom assessment, distress, and health status were collected. Results: 323 participants [101 mAb, 221 non-mAb, 52.7± 15.5 years, 47.7% male, body mass index (BMI) 31.4± 8.4] were analyzed. Fewer symptoms at baseline were reported in mAb versus non-mAb participants (1.06± 1.31 vs 1.78± 2.15, respectively p=0.0177) 6 months: (0.911± 1.276 mAb vs.1.75± 2.22 non-mAb, p=0.0427). Both groups showed significant within-group decreases in symptom number (52 to 21 mAb, 126 to 63 non-mAb) and symptom burden (p=0.0088 mAb, p< 0.00001 non-mAb). mAb patients had significantly shorter infection-to-baseline interval (days) (120.4± 55.3 mAb vs 194.0± 89.3 non-mAb, p< 0.00001); less frequent history of myocardial infarction (0.0 vs 3.9%, p=0.0464); headache (2.0% vs.11.8%, p=0.0046), rash (3.1% vs 9.9%, p=0.0377), and miscellaneous muscle complaints (2.0% vs 12.3%, p=0.0035), plus significantly better 6-month mood. (2.2% vs 13.2%, p=0.0390). Conclusion: mAb treated participants had reduced symptom burden and consistently reported fewer symptoms than non-mAb at all time points despite less time since acute illness. Both groups reported a statistically significant decrease in symptoms by 6-month visit with no statistically significant differences between them at follow-up.

Fine motor performance may serve as an early warning sign for reduced cognitive function. Physical activity can help preserve cognitive function; however, the relationship between fine motor perfor...

Introduction: Post-acute SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) symptoms are often persistent, disruptive, and difficult to treat effectively. Fatigue is often among the most frequently reported symptoms and may indicate a more challenging road to recovery. Purpose: To describe the natural history, symptomology, and risk profile of long-term post-acute SARS-CoV-2. Patients and Methods: Participants treated for SARS-CoV-2 within a large, community health system in the US were enrolled prospectively in a longitudinal, observational PASC study examining participants at enrollment and 6 months. Medical history, symptom reporting, validated measures of cognition, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), were performed for all participants and repeated during study follow-up visits. Results: A total of 323 participants completed baseline evaluations. Sixty one participants indicated clinically significant fatigue (23.1% at baseline); a representative sample of 141 enrollees also completed a baseline Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) in-depth fatigue reporting questionnaire, 37 had severe fatigue. The severely fatigued (FACIT-F ≤ 29.7) were significantly younger, female, had more anxiety and depression, had a higher resting heart rate, reported more sick days, and were less physically active post-COVID. They were more likely to have a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (13.5% vs 2.9%) but less likely to have a history of cancer (8.1% vs 23.1). Participants who were severely fatigued reported health, diet, weight, and sleep were worse than those not severely fatigued post-COVID (p = 0.02 to 0.0002). Fatigue was significantly correlated with impairment of all PROs administered after COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: Fatigue is a common symptom post-COVID-19 infection and is associated with lower reported well-being and function. Those with severe fatigue tended to be younger and female and have a past medical history of anxiety, depression, kidney disease, and more sedentary lifestyles.

Modifiable risk factors associated with cognitive functioning are important for identifying potential targets for intervention development. Although there are a few recognized modifiable risk factors (e.g., diabetes mellitus, diet, physical activity), there are limitations in the conclusions that can be drawn due to limited data. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between modifiable liver disease-linked metabolic and behavioral factors in a sample of community dwelling adults who do not currently experience functional limitations due to cognitive abilities. Individuals aged 19 to 69 were recruited to participate in this cross-sectional study in the Washington, DC area. Participants were assessed using anthropometric measures, ultrasound of the liver, glycated hemoglobin A1C, self-reported fatigue, clinical history, and 7 domains of cognitive function: processing speed, short- and long-term visual memory, working memory, inhibition, shifting, and abstract reasoning. The study included 104 participants (44% female, 51.1 ± 13.5 years old). The modifiable factors that were most consistently related to cognitive performance were waist-to-height ratio, which was related to a decrease in performance in 4 of the domains (short-term and long-term visual memory, working memory, and abstract reasoning), and the presence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which was related to an increase in performance in the same 4 domains. This study suggests that liver disease-linked modifiable factors are associated with cognitive performance, even in middle-aged individuals without self-reported cognitive dysfunction. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms that impact cognitive performance in relation to these factors to establish early intervention targets for reducing future cognitive deficits.