Alzheimer’s disease is the most common type of dementia, reaching 60–80% of case totals, and is one of the major global causes of the elderly population’s decline in functionality concerning daily life activities. Epidemiological research has already indicated that, in addition to several others metabolic factors, diabetes mellitus type 2 is a risk factor of Alzheimer’s disease. Many molecular pathways have been described, and at the same time, there are clues that suggest the connection between type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer’s disease, through specific genes, autophagy, and even inflammatory pathways. A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, and its main goal was to reveal the multilevel connection between these diseases.

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. In addition to cognitive decline, non-cognitive symptoms, including dysautonomia, have been reported, although these symptoms are rarely acknowledged by patients. Dysautonomia in AD is thought to arise from either cholinergic deficits or hypothalamic involvement. A wide range of tests has been used to investigate the role of the autonomic nervous system; however, the results have been inconsistent. Aim: To systematically review all published research investigating autonomic nervous system (ANS) involvement in patients with AD. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in December 2024 across the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Scopus. Results: A total of 1422 records were identified, of which 30 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Several autonomic tests were employed, with Heart Rate Variability (HRV) being the most frequently used. Other tests included assessments of orthostatic hypotension (OH), postprandial hypotension (PPH), sympathetic skin response (SSR), the tilt test, 123I-MIBG cardiac scintigraphy, norepinephrine (NE) measurements in serum and cerebrospinal fluid, and baroreflex sensitivity. In most studies, AD patients were compared to either healthy controls or patients with other types of dementia. Discussion: The primary finding of this review is that, although patients with AD rarely report dysautonomic symptoms, they frequently exhibit abnormal results on various autonomic tests. In some cases, these findings were sufficient to differentiate AD patients from healthy controls as well as from patients with Diffuse Lewy Body disease (DLB). The inconsistency in reporting symptoms, along with the variability in test results, suggests that autonomic dysfunction in AD may be under-recognized and warrants further investigation. Conclusions: The heterogeneity of the included studies limits the generalizability of the results. However, given the potential impact of dysautonomia on both quality of life and mortality, it is recommended that AD patients be systematically assessed for autonomic dysfunction. Even in the absence of overt symptoms, appropriate treatment should be considered where indicated to mitigate potential risks.

Background/Objectives: Cognitive impairment represents a core and prodromal clinical feature of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). We sought to assess specific cognitive domains which are mainly affected among patients with CAA and to investigate probable associations with neuroimaging markers and Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Methods: Thirty-five patients fulfilling the Boston Criteria v1.5 or v2.0 for the diagnosis of probable/possible CAA were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging and CSF biomarker data were collected. Every eligible participant underwent a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment. Spearman’s rank correlation tests were used to identify possible relationships between the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination—Revised (ACE-R) sub-scores and other neurocognitive test scores and the CSF biomarker and neuroimaging parameters among CAA patients. Moreover, linear regression analyses were used to investigate the effects of CSF biomarkers on the ACE-R total score and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, based on the outcomes of univariate analyses. Results: Cognitive impairment was detected in 80% of patients, and 60% had a coexistent Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology based on CSF biomarker profiles. Notable correlations were identified between increased levels of total tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) and diminished performance in terms of overall cognitive function, especially memory. In contrast, neuroimaging indicators, including lobar cerebral microbleeds and superficial siderosis, had no significant associations with cognitive scores. Among the CAA patients, those without AD had superior neurocognitive test performance, with significant differences observed in their ACE-R total scores and memory sub-scores. Conclusions: The significance of tauopathy in cognitive impairment associated with CAA may be greater than previously imagined, underscoring the necessity for additional exploration of the non-hemorrhagic facets of the disease and new neuroimaging markers.

Background: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) represents a progressive cerebrovascular disorder, characterized by aberrant accumulation of beta-amyloid isoforms in cortical and leptomeningeal vessel walls of cerebrum and cerebellum. Methods: We sought to investigate the clinical manifestations, current different diagnostic tools, various therapeutic strategies and most uncommon subtypes of the disease. Results: The vast majority of CAA remains sporadic, with increasing prevalence with age and very frequent coexistence with Alzheimer’s disease. Clinically, CAA can present with spontaneous lobar intracerebral hemorrhage, transient focal neurologic episodes attributed to convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage or cortical superficial siderosis, and progressive cognitive decline leading to dementia. Inflammatory CAA subtype should be recognized early and treated promptly so that better functional outcomes may be achieved. Moreover, genetic and iatrogenic CAA forms are rare, yet increasingly recognized during the last years. Therapeutic management remains challenging for clinicians, especially when markers indicative of higher bleeding risk are present. A targeted therapy does not currently exist. However, various clinical trials are in progress, focusing on offering new promising insights into the disease treatment. Conclusions: This review aims to deepen our understanding of CAA diagnosis and therapeutic approach but also summarizes current evidence on the most uncommon subtypes of this cerebral small-vessel disease.

Background: Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes (PNS) comprise a diverse group of disorders propagated by immune-mediated effects of malignant tumors on neural tissue. Methods: A single-center longitudinal study was performed including consecutive adult patients treated at a tertiary academic hospital between 2015 and 2023 and diagnosed with PNS. PNS were ascertained using the 2004 and the revised 2021 PNS-Care diagnostic criteria. Results: Thirteen patients who fulfilled the 2004 definite PNS criteria were included. PNS comprise diverse neurological syndromes, with neuromuscular junction disorders (54%) and limbic encephalitis (31%) being predominant. PNS-related antibodies were detected in 85% of cases, including anti-AChR (n = 4), anti-P/Q-VGCC (n = 3), anti-Hu (n = 3), anti-Yo (n = 1), anti-Ma (n = 1), anti-titin (n = 1), anti-IgLON5 (n = 1), and anti-GAD65 (n = 1). Thymoma (31%), small-cell lung cancer (23%), and papillary thyroid carcinoma (18%) were the most frequent tumors. Imaging abnormalities were evident in 33% of cases. Early immunotherapy within 4-weeks from symptom onset was associated with favorable outcomes. At a mean follow-up of 2 ± 1 years, two patients with anti-Hu and anti-Yo antibodies died (18%). Four and three patients fulfilled the 2021 PNS-Care diagnostic criteria for definite and probable PNS, respectively. Conclusions: This study highlights the clinical heterogeneity of PNS, emphasizing the need for early suspicion and prompt treatment initiation for optimal outcomes.

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may present with pure (typical or atypical) and mixed phenotypes, sometimes causing difficulties in (differential) diagnosis. In order to achieve a diagnostic accuracy as high as possible, the diagnosis of AD during life depends on various biomarkers, including the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Methods: Classical CSF AD biomarkers were determined in a total of 61 patients, classified as both beta amyloid- and tau-positive A⁺T⁺ (or A⁺T₁⁺ according to the recently revised Alzheimer Association criteria for diagnosis and staging of AD). Twenty one of these patients fulfilled the criteria for mixed AD (mixed with Lewy bodies, cerebrovascular disease, or normal pressure hydrocephalus), whilst 40 had pure AD. Results: Patients did not differ with respect to gender, education, disease duration, and cognitive status. After controlling for confounding factors, no difference was observed between mixed and pure AD groups in Aβ₄₂ or Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ levels. Although by definition, patients of both groups had abnormal (increased) levels of phospho-tau₁₈₁, the mixed AD group presented with lower (less abnormal) levels of phospho-tau181 and total tau as compared to the pure group. Conclusions: In patients with AD of comparable cognitive status, mixed AD cases may present with lower levels of tau proteins and, if close to the cut-off values, diagnostic uncertainty may be increased.