Hao Yu

Mr. Hao Yu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

24 February 2020 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XTXin Tai
Xin Tai
RLRui Li
Rui Li
BZBao Zhang
Bao Zhang
HYHao Yu
Hao Yu
XKXiao Kong
Xiao Kong
DJDecai Jin
Decai Jin
Understanding the effects of pollution on ecological communities and the underlying mechanisms that drive them will helpful for selecting a method to mediate polluted ecosystems. Quantifying the relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes is a very important issue in ecology. However, little is known about their effects on the succession of microbial communities in different pollution levels rural ponds. Also, the processes that govern bacterial communities in polluted ponds are poorly understood. In this study, the microbial communities in water and sediment from the ponds were investigated by using the 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing technology. Meanwhile, we used null model analyses based on a taxonomic and phylogenetic metrics approach to test the microbial community assembly processes. Pollution levels were found to significantly alter the community composition and diversity of bacteria. In the sediment samples, the bacterial diversity indices decreased with increasing pollutant levels. Between-community analysis revealed that community assembly processes among water and sediment samples stochastic ratio both gradually decreased with the increased pollution levels, indicating a potential deterministic environmental filtering that is elicited by pollution. Our results identified assemblage drivers of bacterial community is important for improving the efficacies of ecological evaluation and remediation for contaminated freshwater systems.

10 August 2023 in Biology and Fertility of Soils
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGSongsong Gu
Songsong Gu
XZXueli Zhou
Xueli Zhou
HYHao Yu
Hao Yu
HYHuilin Yan
Huilin Yan
YWYingcheng Wang
Yingcheng Wang
YDYe Deng
Ye Deng

1 May 2014 in Journal of Environmental Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HYHao Yu
Hao Yu
CCChuan Chen
Chuan Chen
Jincai MaJincai Ma
Jincai Ma
XXXijun Xu
Xijun Xu
RFRonggui Fan
Ronggui Fan
AWAijie Wang
Aijie Wang

1 July 2014 in Journal of Environmental Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HYHao Yu
Hao Yu
CCChuan Chen
Chuan Chen
Jincai MaJincai Ma
Jincai Ma
WLWenzong Liu
Wenzong Liu
JZJizhong Zhou
Jizhong Zhou
AWAijie Wang
Aijie Wang

7 February 2023 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HYHuilin Yan
Huilin Yan
XZXueli Zhou
Xueli Zhou
KZKaifu Zheng
Kaifu Zheng
SGSongsong Gu
Songsong Gu
HYHao Yu
Hao Yu
YDYe Deng
Ye Deng
It has been widely recognized that organic fertilizer (OF) application under monoculture and continuous cropping can change the microbial community and increase forage biomass in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. However, as a commonly used grassland planting pattern, the way in which grass–legume mixtures respond to OF application remains unclear. To clarify application effects of organic fertilizer in the grass–legume mixtures, we conducted a field experiment at the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and collected the rhizospheric and bulk soils to reveal their microbial community by using high-throughput sequencing and molecular ecological networks. It was found that OF application changed the microbial community and increased the forage biomass under monoculture. However, in grass–legume mixtures, we found that OF application did not promote the increase of forage (Gramineae) biomass (Student t-test: p > 0.05). By analyzing both prokaryote and fungal communities, it was found that OF application had a greater impact on bulk soil microorganisms than on those of the rhizosphere in grass–legume mixtures. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that the rhizosphere and bulk soil networks of grass–legume mixtures were significantly more vulnerable under OF treatment (vulnerability of prokaryotes in grass: 0.1222; vulnerability of prokaryotes in legumes: 0.1730; fungal vulnerability in grass: 0.0116; fungal vulnerability in legumes: 0.0223) than non-OF treatment (vulnerability of prokaryotes in grass: 0.1015; vulnerability of prokaryotes in legumes: 0.1337; fungal vulnerability in grass: 0.0046; fungal vulnerability in legumes: 0.0126), which indicated that OF application did not provide favorable conditions for microbial interactions in grass–legume mixtures. In addition, structural equation modeling showed that OF application had some significant negative impacts on soil physicochemical properties and the robustness of the prokaryote community. The robustness of fungi had a significant negative (p < 0.001) impact on forage biomass, but OF application had no significant (p > 0.05) direct impact on the forage biomass, which indicated that the OF did not promote forage biomass in grass–legume mixtures. These results suggest that the application of organic fertilizer is unnecessary for grass–legume mixtures, because it does not promote the interactions between rhizospheric microbes and forage.