Heart failure (HF) poses a significant world health challenge due to the increase in the aging population and advancements in cardiac care. In the pathophysiology of HF, the inflammasome has been correlated with the development, progression, and complications of HF disease. Discovering biomarkers linked to inflammasomes enhances understanding of HF diagnosis and prognosis. Directing inflammasome signaling emerges as an innovative therapeutic strategy for managing HF. The present review aims to delve into this inflammatory cascade, understanding its role in the development of HF, its potential role as biomarker, as well as the prospects of modulating inflammasomes as a therapeutic approach for HF.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a revolutionary therapeutic modality for the management of severe aortic stenosis (AS), particularly in patients who are at high or prohibitive risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Over the past decade, extensive clinical evidence has expanded the indications for TAVI to include intermediate- and low-risk populations, which usually represent a population of younger age, in which the most common complications of TAVI, including paravalvular leak (PVL) and pacemaker implantation, should be avoided. This review focuses on the incidence and predictors of PVL in various types of TAVI implantation, its clinical implication, and the prevention strategies to tackle this complication.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been established as a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Despite being initially developed and indicated for high-surgical-risk patients, it is now offered to low-risk populations based on the results of large randomized controlled trials. The most common access sites in the vast majority of patients undergoing TAVI are the common femoral arteries; however, 10–20% of the patients treated with TAVI require an alternative access route, mainly due to peripheral atherosclerotic disease or complex anatomy. Hence, to achieve successful delivery and implantation of the valve, several arterial approaches have been studied, including transcarotid (TCr), axillary/subclavian (A/Sc), transapical (TAp), transaortic (TAo), suprasternal-brachiocephalic (S-B), and transcaval (TCv). This review aims to concisely summarize the most recent literature data and current guidelines as well as evaluate the various access routes for TAVI, focusing on the indications, the various special patient groups, and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, as well as their adverse events.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents the most severe manifestation of coronary artery disease. Intravascular imaging, both intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), have played crucial roles for the impressive reduction in mortality of ACS. Intravascular imaging is useful for the detection of atherosclerotic mechanism (plaque rupture, calcified nodules, or plaque erosions) and for the evaluation of nonatherosclerotic and nonobstructive types of ACS. In addition, IVUS and OCT play a crucial role in the optimization of the PCI. The aim of the current review is to present the role of intravascular imaging in identifying the mechanisms of ACS and its prognostic role in future events, to review the current guidelines suggesting intravascular imaging use in ACS, to summarize its role in PCI in patients with ACS, and to compare IVUS and OCT.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a transformative therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) across all surgical risk groups. However, periprocedural cerebrovascular events (CVEs), including overt stroke and silent cerebral embolism, remain significant complications. As a result, the use of embolic protection devices (EPDs) during TAVI has been proposed to mitigate this risk. Our aim was to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of embolic protection devices in TAVI procedures. According to the existing literature, EPDs are effective in capturing embolic debris during TAVI and are associated with a reduction in silent cerebral lesions as detected by diffusion-weighted MRI. While some RCTs and meta-analyses demonstrate a potential benefit in reducing disabling stroke, evidence for a consistent reduction in overall stroke or mortality remains inconclusive. Subgroup analyses suggest the greatest benefit in patients at elevated stroke risk, while current-generation EPDs demonstrate high technical success and an acceptable safety profile. Subsequently, EPDs represent a promising adjunct to TAVI, particularly in high-risk populations. However, routine use in all patients is not yet supported by consistent clinical evidence. Further large-scale trials and long-term outcome data are needed to clarify their role in improving neurological outcomes and to guide selective patient application.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of aortic valve stenosis, offering a less invasive alternative to surgical valve replacement, particularly in elderly and high-risk populations. As TAVI expands into younger, lower-risk patients, the choice of transcatheter heart valve has become increasingly important to optimize both immediate and long-term outcomes. Currently, Self-Expandable Valves (SEVs) and Balloon-Expandable Valves (BEVs) are the two most widely used platforms, each characterized by distinct design features, implantation techniques, and hemodynamic profiles. While no definitive evidence supports the overall superiority of one valve type over the other, accumulating clinical data highlight specific advantages and limitations depending on anatomical and procedural contexts. This review aims to present and critically discuss the current evidence, clinical considerations, and evolving concerns surrounding the use of SEVs versus BEVs, with a particular focus on challenging scenarios such as valve-in-valve procedures and long-term valve strategy planning.