Nanoparticles serve various industrial and domestic purposes which is reflected in their steadily increasing production volume. This economic success comes along with their presence in the environment and the risk of potentially adverse effects in natural systems. Over the last decade, substantial progress regarding the understanding of sources, fate, and effects of nanoparticles has been made. Predictions of environmental concentrations based on modelling approaches could recently be confirmed by measured concentrations in the field. Nonetheless, analytical techniques are, as covered elsewhere, still under development to more efficiently and reliably characterize and quantify nanoparticles, as well as to detect them in complex environmental matrixes. Simultaneously, the effects of nanoparticles on aquatic and terrestrial systems have received increasing attention. While the debate on the relevance of nanoparticle-released metal ions for their toxicity is still ongoing, it is a re-occurring phenomenon that inert nanoparticles are able to interact with biota through physical pathways such as biological surface coating. This among others interferes with the growth and behaviour of exposed organisms. Moreover, co-occurring contaminants interact with nanoparticles. There is multiple evidence suggesting nanoparticles as a sink for organic and inorganic co-contaminants. On the other hand, in the presence of nanoparticles, repeatedly an elevated effect on the test species induced by the co-contaminants has been reported. In this paper, we highlight recent achievements in the field of nano-ecotoxicology in both aquatic and terrestrial systems but also refer to substantial gaps that require further attention in the future.
As use and emission of metal-based engineered nanomaterials (MENM) is steadily increasing, concern of adverse effects on soil communities is rising. MENM are not only toxic to various organisms in soil, but can bioaccumulate, trophically transfer and even biomagnify in some systems. Negative effects of MENM on plant-fungi and plant-bacteria interactions have been shown in various studies, while further research on other forms of interactions (e.g. competition, predation) is needed to assess potential risks. Negative effects of MENM on nitrogen turnover and increased carbon emissions have been shown in numerous studies, and other biogeochemical cycles potentially at risk are addressed here. Most data to date has been collected on the consequences of MENM exposure for microorganisms and particle dependent changes in their community composition have been shown; data on other organism communities is however not available. In this review we summarize community interactions and soil ecosystem processes affected by MENM exposure and show how soil organisms influence MENM properties. Based on short- and long-term toxic effects, multiple inter- and intraspecific interactions and chemical processes we develop a conceptual framework. We postulate that cascading and potentially catalytic effects of MENM in soil might explain toxic effects at low concentration after longer exposure. Therefore, risk assessment of MENM relying solely on acute single species tests might be insufficient, and major research efforts are still needed in the area of soil communities and MENM exposure.
Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) are integrated into various products due to their antimicrobial characteristics and hence, the application of AgNP is increasing. During production, use and disposal AgNP are emitted and enter the environment via several pathways. Soils are considered a major sink of AgNP. The aim of the present study was to determine the toxic effect of AgNP on Folsomia candida reproduction to illustrate potential impact on terrestrial ecosystems. The AgNP-dependent reduction of F. candida reproduction was studied in RefeSol 01-A, LUFA 2.2 and OECD soil at 0.3 µg – 50 mg Ag kg-1. To simulate realistic exposure pathways, effects on F. candida reproduction after the application of AgNP via sewage sludge and after aging this treatment in the soil for up to 140 days were studied using environmentally relevant concentrations. The OECD representative AgNP, NM-300K, and AgNO3, as a metal salt reference, were used in all experiments. The generated data demonstrate that the presence of AgNP in the soil in the low mg Ag kg-1 concentration range results in significant, but concentration independent inhibition of F. candida reproduction in RefeSol 01-A and LUFA 2.2. Significant inhibition of F. candida reproduction due to AgNP was also observed for soil amended with AgNP treated sludge. An increase in inhibition with aging of the AgNP in the soil was evident. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that, at environmentally relevant concentrations, AgNP adsorption to sludge and subsequent aging in soil lead to a toxic effect on soil invertebrates.
Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) are increasingly emitted to the environment due to a rise in application in various products; therefore, assessment of their potential risks for biota is important. In this study the effects of AgNP at environmentally relevant concentrations (0.6–375 µg kg−1 soil) on the soil invertebrate Folsomia candida in OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) soil was examined at different soil water contents. Animals were retrieved by heat extraction, which had an efficiency of about 90% compared with the floatation method. The tested water content range is set by OECD Guideline 232 (40–60% of the maximum water holding capacity, WHC), and we detected significant differences in toxicity due to these. With AgNO3, used as an ionic control, the number of juveniles significantly decreased only at 40% WHC, which might be due to dilution of the toxicant at higher soil water content. In turn, at 60% WHC, the reproduction of F. candida significantly increased in the presence of AgNP compared with in the control. However, at this water content, the required number of juveniles in the control treatment was not reached in three independent tests. The fact that the OECD validity criterion is not met indicates that the soil conditions are not suitable for reproduction at 60% WHC.