Nicholas Lawler

Mr. Nicholas Lawler


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 May 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDerek Corica
Derek Corica
SBScott D Bell
Scott D Bell
LZLei Zhao
Lei Zhao
NLNicholas Lawler
Nicholas Lawler
MPMcKade Poirier
McKade Poirier
YFYujiang Fang
Yujiang Fang
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a challenge prognostically. A clinically silent early stage and predilection for early metastasis leads to over half of patients presenting with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Akin to many other cancers, once SCLC metastasizes, current therapies begin to lose their effectiveness. The future of SCLC rests in innovative treatments aimed at improving patient outcomes. Chemotherapy and radiation remain the backbone treatment for SCLC. Most patients diagnosed with SCLC begin treatment with combination chemotherapy consisting of a platinum analog and topoisomerase inhibitor with or without concurrent radiation. Disease progression or recurrence warrants new treatment approaches. New chemotherapy combinations and advances in radiation precision offer patients novel approaches using the same backbone of treatment used in many other cancers. The introduction of newer therapeutic approaches, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, small molecule targeted therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody–drug conjugates offer a bright future for patients with SCLC who fail first-line therapy. This review will focus on advancing treatment paradigms for SCLC in the era of precision medicine. Such a study might be helpful for pulmonologists and oncologists to manage precisely patients with SCLC.

29 November 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDerek Corica
Derek Corica
SBScott D Bell
Scott D Bell
PMPeyton John Miller
Peyton John Miller
DKDaniel Kasperbauer
Daniel Kasperbauer
NLNicholas Lawler
Nicholas Lawler
YFYujiang Fang
Yujiang Fang
Immunotherapy offers a novel and promising option in the treatment of late-stage melanoma. By utilizing the immune system to assist in tumor destruction, patients have additional options after tumor progression. Immune checkpoint inhibitors reduce the ability for tumors to evade the immune system by inhibiting key surface proteins used to inactivate T-cells. Without these surface proteins, T-cells can induce cytotoxic responses against tumors. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy is a form of adoptive cell therapy that takes advantage of a small subset of T-cells that recognize and infiltrate tumors. Isolation and rapid expansion of these colonies assist the immune system in mounting a charged response that can induce remission. Tumor vaccines deliver a high dose of unique antigens expressed by tumor cells to the entire body. The introduction of large quantities of tumor antigens upregulates antigen presenting cells and leads to effective activation of the immune system against tumors. Cytokine therapy introduces high amounts of chemical messengers that are endogenous to the immune system and support T-cell expansion. While other methods of immunotherapy exist, immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor vaccines, and cytokine therapy are commonly used to treat melanoma. Like many other cancer treatments, immunotherapy is not without adverse effects, as toxicities represent a major obstacle. However, immunotherapy has been efficacious in the treatment of melanoma.

24 February 2026 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NLNicholas Lawler
Nicholas Lawler
BSBipasha Sobhani
Bipasha Sobhani
ESEjura Yetunde Salihu
Ejura Yetunde Salihu
HMHannah Muller
Hannah Muller
JEJordan Paul Edwards
Jordan Paul Edwards
RBRandy Brown
Randy Brown
Traumatic injuries represent a significant public health challenge, affecting millions worldwide annually and necessitating acute pain management that frequently involves the use of opioid analgesics to mitigate discomfort and facilitate recovery. Although opioids remain an integral part of post-traumatic injury pain management, their use exposes trauma survivors to the risk of developing persistent use, misuse, or opioid use disorder (OUD). Pre-injury health determinants, such as age, gender, psychiatric conditions, medical conditions, and substance use history, may interact with injury-related factors to acutely escalate the risk for misuse and addiction. Despite the growing recognition of these potential vulnerabilities, there remains a lack of evidence-based clinical decision support on modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors specific to post-traumatic injury opioid risk trajectories. This review summarizes the literature related to the multifactorial contributors to opioid misuse and addiction following traumatic injury such as patient-level (e.g., demographics, behavioral health), injury-related (e.g., severity, type), and system-level (e.g., prescribing patterns) characteristics. A comprehensive literature search, inclusive of the literature from 1995 to November 2025, was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar using combinations of terms related to “opioids,” “misuse,” “addiction,” “trauma,” and “injury.” Search keywords and operators were developed in collaboration with a university librarian. Reference lists of articles were searched and synthesized. Case reports, case series, editorials, mini-reviews, letters to editor without original data, and qualitative studies were excluded. The findings of the review are expected to provide insight into clinical-decision making as it relates to the management of pain, pain-related distress and functional impact, and co-occurring conditions that may impact injury-related outcomes and the potential likelihood of substance misuse and addiction.