Background: The optimal management of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection remains debated. Methods: Patients enrolled in the DISCO (Dissezioni Spontanee Coronariche) Registry up to December 2020 were included. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Independent predictors of PCI and medical management were investigated. Results: Among 369 patients, 129 (35%) underwent PCI, whereas 240 (65%) were medically managed. ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (68% versus 35%, P <0.001), resuscitated cardiac arrest (9% versus 3%, P <0.001), proximal coronary segment involvement (32% versus 7%, P <0.001), and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 to 1 (54% versus 20%, P <0.001) were more frequent in the PCI arm. In-hospital event rates were similar. Between patients treated with PCI and medical therapy, there were no differences in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years (13.9% versus 11.7%, P =0.467), all-cause death (0.7% versus 0.4%, P =0.652), myocardial infarction (9.3% versus 8.3%, P =0.921) and repeat PCI (12.4% versus 8.7%, P =0.229). ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction at presentation (odds ratio [OR], 3.30 [95% CI, 1.56–7.12]; P =0.002), proximal coronary segment involvement (OR, 5.43 [95% CI, 1.98–16.45]; P =0.002), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 to 1 and 2 (respectively, OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.08–9.96]; P =0.038; and OR, 3.98 [95% CI, 1.38–11.80]; P =0.009) and luminal narrowing (OR per 5% increase, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.01–1.28]; P =0.037) were predictors of PCI, whereas the 2B-angiographic subtype predicted medical management (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.07–0.83]; P =0.026). Conclusions: Clinical presentation and procedural variables drive the choice of the initial therapeutic approach in spontaneous coronary artery dissection. If PCI is needed, it seems to be associated with a similar risk of short-to-mid-term adverse events compared to medical treatment. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04415762.

BACKGROUND: The FIRE trial (Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Disease) enrolled 1445 older (aged ≥75 years) patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease in Italy, Spain, and Poland. Patients were randomized to physiology-guided complete revascularization or treatment of the only culprit lesion. Physiology-guided complete revascularization significantly reduced ischemic adverse events at 1 year. This prespecified analysis investigated the changes between the 2 study groups in angina status, quality of life, physical performance, and frailty. METHODS: Patients underwent validated scales at hospital discharge (baseline) and 1 year later. Angina status was evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, health-related quality of life by EQ visual analog scale, physical performance by short physical performance battery, and frailty by the clinical frailty scale. Mixed models for repeated measures analysis were used to study the association between the treatment arms, time, and scales. RESULTS: Baseline and 1-year Seattle Angina Questionnaire, EQ visual analog scale, short physical performance battery, and clinical frailty scale were collected in around two-thirds of the entire FIRE study population. The mean age was 80.9±4.6 years (female sex, 35.9%). Overall, 35.3% were admitted for ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, whereas the others were admitted for non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Physiology-guided complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, was associated with greater improvement in terms of angina status (Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score, 7.3 [95% CI, 6.1–8.6] points), health-related quality of life (EQ visual analog scale, 6.2 [95% CI, 4.4–8.1] points), and physical performance (short physical performance battery, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.9–1.3] points). After 1 year, patients randomized to culprit-only revascularization experienced a deterioration in frailty status (clinical frailty scale, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.1–0.3] points), which was not observed in patients randomized to physiology-guided complete revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis suggested that a physiology-guided complete revascularization is associated with consistent benefits in terms of angina status, quality of life, physical performance, and the absence of further deterioration of the frailty status. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03772743.