Literature-based discovery systems aim at discovering valuable latent connections between previously disparate research areas. This is achieved by analyzing the contents of their respective literatures with the help of various intelligent computational techniques. In this paper, we review the progress of literature-based discovery research, focusing on understanding their technical features and evaluating their performance. The present literature-based discovery techniques can be divided into two general approaches: the traditional approach and the emerging approach. The traditional approach, which dominate the current research landscape, comprises mainly of techniques that rely on utilizing lexical statistics, knowledge-based and visualization methods in order to address literature-based discovery problems. On the other hand, we have also observed the births of new trends and unprecedented paradigm shifts among the recently emerging literature-based discovery approach. These trends are likely to shape the future trajectory of the next generation literature-based discovery systems.

The breakthrough potentials of research papers can be explained by their boundary-spanning qualities. Here, for the first time, we apply the structural variation analysis (SVA) model and its affiliated metrics to investigate the extent to which such qualities characterize a group of Nobel Prize winning papers. We find that these papers share remarkable boundary-spanning traits, marked by exceptional abilities to connect disparate and topically-diverse clusters of research papers. Further, their publications exert structural variations on a scale that significantly alters the betweenness centrality distributions in existing intellectual space. Overall, SVA not only provides a set of leading indicators for describing future Nobel Prize winning papers, but also broadens our understanding of similar prize-winning properties that may have been overlooked among other regular publications.

Vision transformers (ViTs) have recently gained traction in plant disease classification due to their strong performance in visual recognition tasks. However, their application to tomato leaf disease recognition remains challenged by two factors, namely the need for models that can generalise across diverse disease conditions and the absence of a unified framework for systematic comparison. Existing ViT-based approaches often yield inconsistent results across datasets and disease types, limiting their reliability and practical deployment. To address these limitations, this study proposes the ViT-Based Robust Framework (ViT-RoT), a novel benchmarking framework designed to systematically evaluate the performance of various ViT architectures in tomato leaf disease classification. The framework facilitates the systematic classification of state-of-the-art ViT variants into high-, moderate-, and low-performing groups for tomato leaf disease recognition. A thorough empirical analysis is conducted using one publicly available benchmark dataset, assessed through standard evaluation metrics. Results demonstrate that the ConvNeXt-Small and Swin-Small models consistently achieve superior accuracy and robustness across all datasets. Beyond identifying the most effective ViT variant, the study highlights critical considerations for designing ViT-based models that are not only accurate but also efficient and adaptable to real-world agricultural applications. This study contributes a structured foundation for future research and development in vision-based plant disease diagnosis.