Fabian Dellefant

Dr. Fabian Dellefant

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 September 2022 in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFabian Dellefant
Fabian Dellefant
CTClaudia A. Trepmann
Claudia A. Trepmann
SGStuart A. Gilder
Stuart A. Gilder
ISIuliia V. Sleptsova
Iuliia V. Sleptsova
MKMelanie Kaliwoda
Melanie Kaliwoda
BWBenjamin P. Weiss
Benjamin P. Weiss
We investigated microfabrics of shocked Archean gneisses from two, 10 m-deep drill cores located near the center of the Vredefort impact structure in an area that is characterized by a prominent, long-wavelength negative magnetic anomaly (< − 3000 nT) together with short-wavelength, high-amplitude anomalies attributed to lightning strikes. Planar fractures and feather features in quartz, which can be partially recrystallized, indicate shock conditions less than 20 GPa. Micrometer-sized magnetite and ilmenite along shock-related shear fractures in quartz and feldspar emanate from adjacent deformed coarse (> 100 µm) ilmenite and magnetite host grains. These fine-scaled veins suggest mobilization of magnetite and ilmenite during shear deformation of host Fe-phases and adjacent silicates, probably associated with frictional heating. Coarse ilmenite has fine-lamellar mechanical twins parallel to {10 $$\overline{1}$$ 1 ¯ 1} and single (0001) twins, indicative of dislocation-glide-controlled deformation under non-isostatic stresses related to shock. A few µm-wide magnetite lamellae parallel to {10 $$\overline{1}$$ 1 ¯ 1} and spheroidal magnetite (diameter ≈10 µm) within coarse ilmenite document exsolution after shock. Dauphiné twins associated with planar features in quartz imply cooling from 650 to 725 °C after shock, which accords with estimates of pre-impact basement temperatures from petrographic studies. The Curie temperature of magnetite is 580 °C; therefore, the central negative magnetic anomaly was produced as a thermoremanent magnetization acquired during cooling of the initially hot crust. The long-wavelength anomaly was likely amplified by the newly created magnetite that also acquired a thermal remanence. Although the magnetic properties of surface samples are often influenced by lightning strikes, we found no microstructural evidence for lightning-related processes.

1 June 2024 in American Mineralogist: Journal of Earth and Planetary Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FDFabian Dellefant
Fabian Dellefant
CTClaudia A. Trepmann
Claudia A. Trepmann
WSWolfang W. Schmahl
Wolfang W. Schmahl
SGStuart A. Gilder
Stuart A. Gilder
ISIuliia V. Sleptsova
Iuliia V. Sleptsova
MKMelanie Kaliwoda
Melanie Kaliwoda
Aggregates of ilmenite with varying amounts of rutile, ferropseudobrookite, and pseudorutile in suevites from the Ries impact structure have been analyzed by light microscopy, analytical scanning electron microscopy, electron microprobe analysis, and Raman spectroscopy to constrain their formation conditions. The tens to hundreds of micrometer aggregates comprise isometric ilmenite grains up to 15 µm in diameter that form a foam structure (i.e., smoothly curved grain boundaries and 120° angles at triple junctions). Grains with foam structure show no internal misorientations, indicating a post-impact formation. In contrast, ilmenite grains with internal misorientation occurring in the core of the aggregates are interpreted as shocked remnant ilmenite originating from the target gneisses. They can contain twin lamellae that share a common {1120} plane with the host, and the c-axis is oriented at an angle of 109° to that of the host. Similarly, the new grains with foam structure display up to three orientation domains, sharing one common {1120} plane for each pair of domains and c-axes at angles of 109° and 99°, respectively. This systematic orientation relationship likely reflects a cubic supersymmetry resulting from the transformation of the initial ilmenite upon shock (>16 GPa) to a transient perovskite-type high-pressure phase (liuite), subsequent retrograde transformation to the polymorph wangdaodeite, and then back-transformation to ilmenite. Whereas, the new grains with foam structure formed from complete transformation, the twin domains in the shocked ilmenite are interpreted to represent only partial transformation. Ferropseudobrookite occurs mostly near the rim of the aggregates. An intergrowth of ferropseudobrookite, ilmenite, and rutile, as well as magnetite or rarely armalcolite occurs at contact with the (devitrified) matrix. The presence of ferropseudobrookite indicates high temperature (>1140 °C) and reducing conditions. The surrounding matrix provided Mg2+ to form the ferropseudobrookite-armalcolite solid solution. Rutile can occur within the aggregates and/or along the ilmenite boundaries; it is interpreted to have formed together with iron during the decomposition of ilmenite at lower temperatures (850–1050 °C). We suggest magnetite in the rims formed by electrochemical gradients driven by the presence of a reducing agent, where Fe2+ within ilmenite diffused toward the rim. Subsequent cooling under oxidizing conditions led to the formation of magnetite from the iron-enriched rim as well as pseudorutile around ilmenite grains. Our study demonstrates that the specific crystallographic relationships of ilmenite grains with foam structure indicate a back-transformation from high (shock) pressures >16 GPa; moreover, the presence of associated Fe-Ti-oxides helps indicate local temperature and oxygen fugacity conditions.

15 October 2025 in Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FDFabian Dellefant
Fabian Dellefant
RKRosemarie Klemm
Rosemarie Klemm
JBJulia Budka
Julia Budka
MKMelanie Kaliwoda
Melanie Kaliwoda

19 April 2024 in International Journal of Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFabian Dellefant
Fabian Dellefant
LSLina Seybold
Lina Seybold
CTClaudia A. Trepmann
Claudia A. Trepmann
SGStuart A. Gilder
Stuart A. Gilder
ISIuliia V. Sleptsova
Iuliia V. Sleptsova
MKMelanie Kaliwoda
Melanie Kaliwoda
In the Aumühle quarry of the Ries impact structure, moderately shocked clasts from the Variscan basement occur sandwiched between overlying suevite and components derived from the Mesozoic sedimentary cover of the underlying Bunte Breccia without distinct shock effects. We analyzed the clasts by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM/EDS/EBSD), and Raman spectroscopy to unravel their emplacement relation to the overlying suevite and the sediment-rock clasts of the Bunte Breccia. Clasts sizes range up to few decimeters and are embedded in a fine-grained lithic matrix; no impact-melt fragments are observed. Amphibolite clasts contain maskelynite with few lamellar remnants of feldspar, indicating shock pressures of 28–34 GPa. Amphiboles have cleavage fractures and ( $$\overline{1}$$ 1 ¯ 01) mechanical twins suggesting differential stresses > 400 MPa. Felsic gneiss components have optically isotropic SiO2 indicative of shock pressures ≈35 GPa. Metagranite cataclasite clasts contain shocked calcite aggregates and quartz with a high density of fine rhombohedral planar deformation features indicating shock pressures ≈20 GPa. The moderately shocked basement clasts originate from deeper levels of the transient cavity and lower radial distance to the center of the structure compared to the sediment-rock clasts. Both were ballistically ejected during crater excavation. In accordance with palaeo- and rock magnetic data, they were mixed during turbulent deposition at the top of the Bunte Breccia before the emplacement of suevite. The high amount of basement clasts below suevite and on top of the underlying Bunte Breccia is consistent with the commonly reported inverse stratigraphy in the Ries impact structure. Graphical Abstract

23 April 2024 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JTJustin A. D. Tonti‐Filippini
Justin A. D. Tonti‐Filippini
BRBoris Robert
Boris Robert
ÉMÉlodie Muller
Élodie Muller
APAndré Navin Paul
André Navin Paul
FDFabian Dellefant
Fabian Dellefant
SGStuart A. Gilder
Stuart A. Gilder
Paleomagnetic records of middle Neoproterozoic (820 to 780 Ma) rocks display high amplitude directional variations that lead to large discrepancies in paleogeographic reconstructions. Hypotheses to explain these data include rapid true polar wander (TPW), a geomagnetic field geometry that deviates from a predominantly axial dipole field, a hyper‐reversing field (>10 reversals/Ma), and/or undiagnosed remagnetization. To test these hypotheses, we collected 1,057 oriented cores over a 85 m stratigraphic succession in the Laoshanya Formation (Yangjiaping, Hunan, China). High precision U‐Pb dating of two intercalated tuff layers constrain the age of the sediments between 809 and 804 Ma. Thermal demagnetization isolates three magnetization components residing in hematite which are not time‐progressive but conflated throughout the section. All samples possess a north and downward directed component in geographic coordinates at temperatures up to 660°C that is ascribed to a Cretaceous overprint. Two components isolated above 660°C reveal distinct directional clusters: one is interpreted as a depositional remanence, while the other appears to be the result of a mid‐Paleozoic (460 to 420 Ma) remagnetization, which is likely widespread throughout South China. The high‐temperature directions are subtly dependent on lithology; microscopic and rock magnetic analyses identify multiple generations of hematite that vary in concentration and distinguish the magnetization components. A comparison with other middle Neoproterozoic paleomagnetic studies in the region indicates that the sudden changes in paleomagnetic directions, used elsewhere to support the rapid TPW hypothesis (ca. 805 Ma), are better explained by mixtures of primary and remagnetized components, and/or vertical axis rotations.

10 May 2026 in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NANastaran Ahanin
Nastaran Ahanin
SGStuart A. Gilder
Stuart A. Gilder
JEJan Ove R. Ebbestad
Jan Ove R. Ebbestad
SRSophie Roud
Sophie Roud
FDFabian Dellefant
Fabian Dellefant
YZYury Zablotski
Yury Zablotski