Elizabeth Nally

Dr. Elizabeth Nally


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 March 2024 in Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MYMatthew Young
Matthew Young
JTJose C. Tapia
Jose C. Tapia
BSBernadett Szabados
Bernadett Szabados
AJAgne Jovaisaite
Agne Jovaisaite
FJFrancesca Jackson-Spence
Francesca Jackson-Spence
TPThomas Powles
Thomas Powles
Reliable biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain elusive. While several markers have been shown to be associated with prognosis, and may aid in risk assessment, predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have not been established. Previous studies have shown that a high pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a negative prognostic factor in RCC. However, a clinically useful cut-off for the predictive and prognostic value of NLR has not been well defined. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 132 patients with previously untreated metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC) who received first line ICI-based therapy. ICI-based therapy included anti-PD-1/PD-L1 alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 or VEGF-TKI. Platelet, haemoglobin, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were collected prior to treatment and at 12-weeks after treatment initiation. Radiologic response at 12-weeks and overall survival (OS) data was also collected. Low haemoglobin, high platelet count, and NLR ≥3 were statistically significant negative predictive biomarkers when assessed at 12-weeks, but not at baseline. Median OS was shorter in patients with low haemoglobin (20.3 months vs. 51.6 months, P = .009), high platelet count (14.3 months vs. 43.8 months, P = .003), and NLR ≥ 3 (17.5 months vs. 40.3 months, P < .001) at 12-weeks. In an IMDC-risk adjusted analysis, only NLR ≥3 at 12-weeks remained statistically significant (OR of 2.11, P = .003) A dynamic change towards lower absolute NLR overtime was associated with longer OS. In patients who had baseline NLR ≥ 3, those who achieved NLR < 3 at 12-weeks demonstrated significant longer median OS compared to those whose NLR remained persistently ≥ 3 (40.3 months vs. 14.7 months, P = .004). NLR ≥3, low haemoglobin and elevated platelet count after 12-weeks of ICI-based first line therapy were negatively prognostic and predictive in patients with metastatic RCC. Normalization of NLR in patients with baseline elevation was associated with longer median OS and response to therapy. These results suggest that monitoring of routine haematologic biomarkers during therapy may provide important predictive and prognostic information, beyond what is available with baseline risk assessment scoring systems.

1 May 2024 in Cancer Management and Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ENElizabeth Nally
Elizabeth Nally
MYMatthew Young
Matthew Young
VCVishwani Chauhan
Vishwani Chauhan
CWConnor Wells
Connor Wells
BSBernadett Szabados
Bernadett Szabados
FJFrancesca Jackson-Spence
Francesca Jackson-Spence
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an aggressive and difficult malignancy to treat. Owing to its rarity and the lack of specific high-level data, management mirrors that of urothelial cancer of the bladder (UCB). Over the past decade, UTUC has shown minimal improvement in survival rates. Its location makes the diagnosis and staging of UTUC more complex. Moreover, surgery often leads to a decline in renal function, rendering a proportion of patients ineligible for cisplatin. There is debate as to how best manage locally advanced UTUC perioperatively. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment landscape for UCB, the response to ICIs in UTUC has been variable. With new technologies, our understanding of the molecular biology of UTUC has grown, helping to identify key molecular differences from UCB. This review summarises the evidence available on UTUC as a disease entity, discusses treatment in perioperative and metastatic settings, and considers future directions for the management of patients diagnosed with UTUC.

1 June 2024 in European Urology Focus
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ENElizabeth Nally
Elizabeth Nally
MYMatthew Young
Matthew Young
CWConnor Wells
Connor Wells
RFRory Fairhead
Rory Fairhead
KBKatherine Baines
Katherine Baines
TPThomas Powles
Thomas Powles

5 September 2021 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
ENElizabeth Nally
Elizabeth Nally
MGMyria Galazi
Myria Galazi
NSNicole Smallcombe
Nicole Smallcombe
HMHelen Mills
Helen Mills
WRWilliam Ricketts
William Ricketts
Introduction: The multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting brings together specialised professionals with the overarching goal of improving care for cancer patients. However, increasing patient load and complexity has impacted on the educational role of the MDT for trainees. Aims & Objectives: We aimed to identify the current trainee experience of the MDT at a London tertiary respiratory and oncology centre and the barriers to a positive educational experience. We endeavoured to identify educational tools and resources that will improve the experience of the MDT. Method: We collated feedback from a number of sources including the annual General Medical Council (GMC) survey, a pan-London respiratory/oncology training day and previous quality improvement projects to assess current attitudes towards the MDT amongst trainees. Results: Over 50% of respiratory and oncology trainees were not satisfied with their experience within the MDT and were not achieving their curriculum objectives. Trainees reported that they were not having the opportunity to present cases or be involved in clinical decision making and teaching within the MDT setting was limited. Conclusions: To improve the educational experience of the MDT meetings for trainees, we aim to develop a simulation, multi-modal, multidisciplinary meeting run by trainees and facilitated by consultants and education academy staff. Cases will be presented and discussed to prompt clinical decision making and discussion whilst also taking into account the human factors involved in a multi-speciality meeting.

2 March 2026 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ENElizabeth Nally
Elizabeth Nally
AJAgne Jovaisaite
Agne Jovaisaite
SMSara Coca Membribes
Sara Coca Membribes
GPGarima Priyadarshini
Garima Priyadarshini
CGCatherine Graham
Catherine Graham
TPThomas Powles
Thomas Powles
Background/Objectives: Most patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) progress on first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Subsequent vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is standard. Due to the rapid evolution in treatment landscape, data directly comparing outcomes of VEGF-TKI following ICI versus VEGF-TKI alone are limited. This scoping review aimed to explore whether VEGF-TKI following prior ICI is associated with improved outcome, potentially reflecting a treatment sequence effect. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically to identify phase 2/3 prospective clinical trials that investigated VEGF-TKI in patients who had progressed after ≥1 therapy published from 2004. Included studies were summarised by prior therapy and reported outcomes. Data from subgroups/arms were extracted and weighted overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) calculated for patients pretreated with VEGF-TKI versus ICI. An exploratory, hypothesis generating analysis was performed comparing outcomes between patients who received prior VEGF-TKI only or ICI-based therapy. Results: In total, 17 clinical trials were included: 2538 patients had prior VEGF-TKI (15 subgroups/arms) and 724 prior ICI-based therapy (11 subgroups/arms). In prior VEGF-TKI, weighted mORR was 8% (IQR 6–16%) versus 28% (IQR 20–41%) post-ICI. Weighted mPFS was 3.9 m (IQR 3.6–5.4) with prior VEGF-TKI versus 8.3 m (IQR 7.4–10.3) in prior ICI group. Weighted mOS was 15.2 m (IQR 11.1–16.6) versus 22.1 m (IQR 10.9–22.1) with prior ICI. Conclusions: Improved outcomes in ICI pretreated population in this exploratory analysis suggests ongoing biological benefit of ICI therapy. As prospective 2L randomised studies are not feasible, we conclude that VEGF therapy in pretreated mRCC is at least as good, if not better, since the introduction of 1st line ICI.

5 August 2026 in ESMO Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMSara Coca Membribes
Sara Coca Membribes
DBD.M. Berney
D.M. Berney
LBL. Beltran
L. Beltran
ENElizabeth Nally
Elizabeth Nally
FJFrancesca Jackson-Spence
Francesca Jackson-Spence
CAC. Ackerman
C. Ackerman