Background. Complement dysregulation occurs in thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) other than primary atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). A few of these patients have been reported previously to be successfully treated with eculizumab. Methods. We identified 29 patients with so-called secondary aHUS who had received eculizumab at 11 Spanish nephrology centres. Primary outcome was TMA resolution, defined by a normalization of platelet count (>150 × 10⁹/L) and haemoglobin, disappearance of all the markers of microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia (MAHA), and improvement of renal function, with a ≥25% reduction of serum creatinine from the onset of eculizumab administration. Results. Twenty-nine patients with secondary aHUS (15 drug-induced, 8 associated with systemic diseases, 2 with postpartum, 2 with cancer-related, 1 associated with acute humoral rejection and 1 with intestinal lymphangiectasia) were included in this study. The reason to initiate eculizumab treatment was worsening of renal function and persistence of TMA despite treatment of the TMA cause and plasmapheresis. All patients showed severe MAHA and renal function impairment (14 requiring dialysis) prior to eculizumab treatment and 11 presented severe extrarenal manifestations. A rapid resolution of the TMA was observed in 20 patients (68%), 15 of them showing a ≥50% serum creatinine reduction at the last follow-up. Comprehensive genetic and molecular studies in 22 patients identified complement pathogenic variants in only 2 patients. With these two exceptions, eculizumab was discontinued, after a median of 8 weeks of treatment, without the occurrence of aHUS relapses. Conclusion. Short treatment with eculizumab can result in a rapid improvement of patients with secondary aHUS in whom TMA has persisted and renal function worsened despite treatment of the TMA-inducing condition.

Background and objectives: Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis represents an emerging cause of acute kidney disease, especially among polymedicated elderly patients. Although corticosteroids are frequently used, controversy exists about the timing of initiation, efficacy, safety, and duration of treatment. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We performed a retrospective study of 182 patients with biopsy-proven drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis from 13 Spanish centers. Exposure was defined as the length of corticosteroid treatment. The main outcome was the level of serum creatinine at month 6, with respect to baseline values. Results: The most common offending agents were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (27%). In 30% of patients, the offending drug could not be identified. The median time to suspected drug withdrawal was 11 days (interquartile range, 5–22). All patients presented with acute kidney disease and were treated with corticosteroids. The mean initial dose of prednisone was 0.8±0.2 mg/kg per day. High-dose corticosteroid treatment was maintained for 2 weeks (interquartile range, 1–4). After 6 months, the mean recovered GFR was 34±26 ml/min per 1.73 m² and ten patients required maintenance dialysis. Use of high-dose corticosteroids for 3 weeks or treatment duration >8 weeks were not associated with better recovery of kidney function. In the multivariable analysis, delayed onset of steroid treatment (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.04) and the presence of interstitial fibrosis of >50% on the kidney biopsy specimen (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.7 to 27.4) were both associated with serum creatinine level at month 6 of >75%, with respect to baseline values. Conclusions: High-dose corticosteroid treatment for 3 weeks or prolonged treatment for >8 weeks were not associated with greater kidney function recovery in drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. A delay in the initiation of corticosteroids resulted in worse recovery of kidney function.

The phenotype of renal involvement in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) vasculitis has a major influence on survival, and histological subgrouping of diagnostic renal biopsies has been proposed to aid in the prediction of renal outcome. We aimed to validate this histological subgrouping and to investigate the additional value of ANCA serotype in the prediction of renal outcome. Data were retrospectively collected from the time of diagnosis by systematic review of medical records from 136 patients with renal biopsies recruited to cohorts from the UK and Spain, over 15 years. The end point, renal survival, was the composite of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death from any cause. The occurrence of ESRD, Stage 4 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative-Chronic Kidney Disease, was assessed separately, in order to establish a severity index risk of chronic kidney disease. Renal survival at 5 years was 96% in the focal, 86% in the crescentic, 81% in the mixed and 61% in the sclerotic subgroups (P = 0.03). Myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA was associated with more severe disease when compared with PR3-ANCA, as demonstrated by a lower frequency of focal and higher frequency of sclerotic subgroups, by more advanced interstitial fibrotic change and by lower glomerular filtration rate at diagnosis and worse renal function at 1 and 2 years. We have confirmed the predictive value for renal survival of the ANCA vasculitis histology classification in a multi-centre study. We found a worse renal outcome in patients with tubulointerstitial fibrosis and atrophy. MPO-ANCA positive patients had a worse renal prognosis due to more severe glomerular injury. These results contribute to patient stratification in renal vasculitis for therapeutic, epidemiological and basic research.