Background/Objectives: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a higher prevalence among older adults. Iron deficiency (ID), affecting up to 50% of HF patients, is closely linked to chronic inflammation, exacerbating HF outcomes. This review aims to explore the interplay between inflammation, ID, and HF, focusing on older patients, and to identify therapeutic gaps and emerging treatment strategies. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, emphasizing the pathophysiological mechanisms of inflammation and ID in HF, the challenges of current diagnostic criteria, and the limitations of available treatments. Emerging pharmacological and diagnostic approaches were analyzed. Results: Chronic inflammation in HF, particularly in older adults, promotes functional ID through elevated hepcidin levels, impairing iron availability and worsening anemia. Current diagnostic criteria, relying heavily on ferritin, often misclassify ID due to inflammation. Intravenous (IV) iron therapy shows clinical benefits in patients with <50% left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but the evidence is limited in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Emerging therapies, such as Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors like Roxadustat, offer promising avenues to improve iron metabolism and outcomes. Conclusions: ID and inflammation significantly impact HF progression, particularly inolder adults. Refining diagnostic criteria and exploring innovative therapies are critical to addressing these challenges. Future research should prioritize personalized approaches targeting inflammation and ID, especially in underrepresented populations, such as HFpEF and elderly patients.

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases remain a global health challenge, with ischemic heart disease (IHD) being the primary cause of both morbidity and mortality. Despite optimal pharmacological therapy, older patients with IHD exhibit an increased susceptibility to recurrent ischemic events, significantly impacting their prognosis. Inflammation is intricately linked with the aging process and plays a pivotal role in the evolution of atherosclerosis. Emerging anti-inflammatory therapies have shown promise in reducing ischemic events among high-risk populations. This review aims to explore the potential of targeted anti-inflammatory interventions in improving clinical outcomes and the quality of life for older patients with IHD.

There is an unmet need to create consensus documents on the management of cardiorenal patients since, due to the aging of the population and the rise of both pathologies, these patients are becoming more prevalent in daily clinical practice. Chronic kidney disease coexists in up to 40%–50% of patients with chronic heart failure cases. There have yet to be consensus documents on how to approach palliative care in cardiorenal patients. There are guidelines for patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease separately, but they do not specifically address patients with concomitant heart failure and kidney disease. For this reason, our document includes experts from different specialties, who will not only address the justification of palliative care in cardiorenal patients but also how to identify this patient profile, the shared planning of their care, as well as knowledge of their trajectory and the palliative patient management both in the drugs that will help us control symptoms and in advanced measures. Dialysis and its different types will also be addressed, as palliative measures and when the decision to continue or not perform them could be considered. Finally, the psychosocial approach and adapted pharmacotherapy will be discussed.

Background/Objectives: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes morbidity in older adults with cardiovascular disease, in whom infection may precipitate severe lower respiratory tract disease, hospitalization, functional decline, and cardiovascular destabilization. We evaluate the evidence for RSV vaccination in cardiovascular disease and propose a jurisdiction-adaptable framework for integrating vaccination into cardiovascular care. Methods: Observational studies, randomized trials, pragmatic and test-negative studies, prespecified cardiovascular analyses of DAN-RSV, and eligibility recommendations were narratively synthesized and translated into a pathway encompassing patient identification, eligibility and risk assessment, vaccine delivery and co-administration, documentation, and follow-up. Results: Acute cardiac events are frequent during RSV hospitalization, and cardiovascular risk may persist after infection. Randomized trials establish protection against RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease and respiratory illness, while real-world studies support effectiveness against RSV-related hospitalization. DAN-RSV reduced all-cause cardiorespiratory hospitalization but did not demonstrate significant reductions in cardiovascular hospitalization, myocardial infarction, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, atrial fibrillation, stroke, cardiovascular death, or major adverse cardiovascular events; observational associations with lower post-vaccination cardiovascular-event rates remain hypothesis-generating. The framework prioritizes adults aged ≥75 years and those aged 50–74 years with high-risk cardiovascular conditions where consistent with national recommendations, embeds vaccination assessment across cardiology, HF, primary care, pharmacy, and long-term care, and incorporates co-administration, documentation, and outcome surveillance. Conclusions: The principal contribution is a pathway for moving RSV vaccination from recommendation to routine preventive care for adults with cardiovascular disease. It anchors implementation in established RSV and cardiorespiratory benefits while treating cardiovascular-event reduction as a research priority rather than a demonstrated indication.

Background: Polypharmacy is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but the prognostic significance of severe polypharmacy remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated its association with all-cause mortality in adults with HF. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through August 2026. Observational studies assessing severe polypharmacy (the highest medication-burden category in each study; ≥9 to ≥15 medications) and all-cause mortality in adults with HF were eligible. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses and post hoc threshold-specific analyses were performed. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) and GRADE, respectively. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261507517). Results: Nine studies included 44,213 patients. Severe polypharmacy was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.86–1.26; p = 0.67; I² = 79%). NOS scores ranged from 6 to 9. Leave-one-out HRs ranged from 0.996 to 1.097, with all 95% CIs including 1. In six studies defining severe polypharmacy as ≥10 medications, the pooled HR was 1.15 (95% CI 1.00–1.32; p = 0.054; I² = 37.8%). Certainty of evidence was very low because of serious inconsistency and imprecision. Conclusions: No statistically significant association was identified, but very low certainty of evidence precludes firm conclusions, and clinically important associations cannot be excluded. Medication count should be interpreted alongside treatment appropriateness and clinical complexity.