Background: Small studies have suggested that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate continuous training (MCT) in reversing cardiac remodeling and increasing aerobic capacity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The present multicenter trial compared 12 weeks of supervised interventions of HIIT, MCT, or a recommendation of regular exercise (RRE). Methods: Two hundred sixty-one patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and New York Heart Association class II to III were randomly assigned to HIIT at 90% to 95% of maximal heart rate, MCT at 60% to 70% of maximal heart rate, or RRE. Thereafter, patients were encouraged to continue exercising on their own. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, after the intervention, and at follow-up after 52 weeks. Primary end point was a between-group comparison of change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter from baseline to 12 weeks. Results: Groups did not differ in age (median, 60 years), sex (19% women), ischemic pathogenesis (59%), or medication. Change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter from baseline to 12 weeks was not different between HIIT and MCT ( P =0.45); left ventricular end-diastolic diameter changes compared with RRE were −2.8 mm (−5.2 to −0.4 mm; P =0.02) in HIIT and −1.2 mm (−3.6 to 1.2 mm; P =0.34) in MCT. There was also no difference between HIIT and MCT in peak oxygen uptake ( P =0.70), but both were superior to RRE. However, none of these changes was maintained at follow-up after 52 weeks. Serious adverse events were not statistically different during supervised intervention or at follow-up at 52 weeks (HIIT, 39%; MCT, 25%; RRE, 34%; P =0.16). Training records showed that 51% of patients exercised below prescribed target during supervised HIIT and 80% above target in MCT. Conclusions: HIIT was not superior to MCT in changing left ventricular remodeling or aerobic capacity, and its feasibility remains unresolved in patients with heart failure. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00917046.

Cristen Willer, Kristian Hveem and colleagues use an exome array to identify a coding variant in TM6SF2 that is associated with total cholesterol levels. They further show that transient overexpression of TM6SF2 or knockdown of Tm6sf2 in mice alters serum lipid profiles, implicating TM6SF2 as a causal regulator of lipid traits. Blood lipid levels are heritable, treatable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. We systematically assessed genome-wide coding variation to identify new genes influencing lipid traits, fine map known lipid loci and evaluate whether low-frequency variants with large effects exist for these traits. Using an exome array, we genotyped 80,137 coding variants in 5,643 Norwegians. We followed up 18 variants in 4,666 Norwegians and identified ten loci with coding variants associated with a lipid trait (P < 5 × 10−8). One variant in TM6SF2 (encoding p.Glu167Lys), residing in a known genome-wide association study locus for lipid traits, influences total cholesterol levels and is associated with myocardial infarction. Transient TM6SF2 overexpression or knockdown of Tm6sf2 in mice alters serum lipid profiles, consistent with the association observed in humans, identifying TM6SF2 as a functional gene within a locus previously known as NCAN-CILP2-PBX4 or 19p13. This study demonstrates that systematic assessment of coding variation can quickly point to a candidate causal gene.

To study the distribution of longitudinal systolic strain and strain rate (SR) as indicators of myocardial deformation according to age and sex in a healthy population. Longitudinal strain and SR were determined in 1266 healthy individuals from three standard apical views, using a combination of speckle tracking (ST) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) to track regions of interest (ROIs). To test applicability of the reference values, we used a subset of the population to compare four methods of assessing myocardial deformation: (1) a combination of TDI and ST; (2) TDI with fixed ROIs; (3) TDI with tracking of ROIs; and (4) ST. Mean (SD) overall global longitudinal strain and SR were −17.4% (2.3) and −1.05 s ⁻¹ (0.13) in women, and −15.9% (2.3) and −1.01 s ⁻¹ (0.13) in men. Deformation indices decreased with increasing age. The combined and ST methods showed identical SR, but values were significantly lower than those obtained by TDI. Strain was overestimated by the ST method (18.4%) compared with the combined method (17.4%). The reference values for global and segmental longitudinal strain and SR obtained from this population study are applicable for use in a wide clinical setting.

Myocardial deformation by echocardiographic strain imaging is a key measurement in cardiology, providing valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. Reference ranges for strain should be established from large healthy populations with minimal methodologic biases and variability. The aim of this study was to establish echocardiographic reference ranges, including lower normal limits of global strains for all 4 cardiac chambers, by guideline-directed dedicated views from a large healthy population and to evaluate the influence of subject-specific characteristics on strain. In total, 1,329 healthy participants from HUNT4Echo, the echocardiographic substudy of the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study, were included. Echocardiographic recordings specific for each chamber were optimized according to current recommendations. Two experienced sonographers recorded all echocardiograms using GE HealthCare Vivid E95 scanners. Analyses were performed by experts using GE HealthCare EchoPAC. The reference ranges for left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain and right ventricular free-wall strain were -24% to -16% and -35% to -17%, respectively. Correspondingly, left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) reservoir strains were 17% to 49% and 17% to 59%. All strains showed lower absolute values with higher age, except for LA and RA contractile strains, which were higher. The feasibility for strain was overall good (LV 96%, right ventricular 83%, LA 94%, and RA 87%). All chamber-specific strains were associated with age, and LV strain was associated with sex. Reference ranges of strain for all cardiac chambers were established based on guideline-directed chamber-specific recordings. Age and sex were the most important factors influencing reference ranges and should be considered when using strain echocardiography.