Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a significant global health concern and the leading cause of death in many countries. Early detection and diagnosis of CVD can significantly reduce the risk of complications and mortality. Machine learning methods, particularly classification algorithms, have demonstrated their potential to accurately predict the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) by analyzing patient data. This study evaluates seven binary classification algorithms, including Random Forests, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Support Vector Machines, Gradient Boosting, and Artificial Neural Networks, to understand their effectiveness in predicting CVD. Advanced preprocessing techniques, such as SMOTE–ENN for addressing class imbalance and hyperparameter optimization through Grid Search Cross-Validation, were applied to enhance the reliability and performance of these models. Standard evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC-AUC), were used to assess predictive capabilities. The results show that kNN achieved the highest accuracy (99%) and AUC (0.99), surpassing traditional models like Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting. The study examines the challenges encountered when working with datasets related to cardiovascular diseases, such as class imbalance and feature selection. It demonstrates how addressing these issues enhances the reliability and applicability of predictive models. These findings emphasize the potential of kNN as a reliable tool for early CVD prediction, offering significant improvements over previous studies. This research highlights the value of advanced machine learning techniques in healthcare, addressing key challenges and laying a foundation for future studies aimed at improving predictive models for CVD prevention.

Background and objectives: Large language models (LLMs) show promise in automating open-ended evaluation tasks, yet their reliability in rubric-based assessment remains uncertain. Variability in scoring, feedback, and rubric adherence raises concerns about transparency and pedagogical validity in educational contexts. This study introduces CourseEvalAI, a framework designed to enhance consistency and fidelity in rubric-guided evaluation by fine-tuning a general-purpose LLM with authentic university-level instructional content. Methods: The framework employs supervised fine-tuning with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) on rubric-annotated answers and explanations drawn from undergraduate computer science exams. Responses generated by both the base and fine-tuned models were independently evaluated by two human raters and two LLM judges, applying dual-layer rubrics for answers (technical or argumentative) and explanations. Inter-rater reliability was reported as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,1)), Krippendorff’s α, and quadratic-weighted Cohen’s κ (QWK), and statistical analyses included Welch’s t tests with Holm–Bonferroni correction, Hedges’ g with bootstrap confidence intervals, and Levene’s tests. All responses, scores, feedback, and metadata were stored in a Neo4j graph database for structured exploration. Results: The fine-tuned model consistently outperformed the base version across all rubric dimensions, achieving higher scores for both answers and explanations. After multiple-testing correction, only the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4)—judged Technical Answer contrast remains statistically significant; other contrasts show positive trends without passing the adjusted threshold, and no additional significance is claimed for explanation-level results. Variance in scoring decreased, inter-model agreement increased, and evaluator feedback for fine-tuned outputs contained fewer vague or critical remarks, indicating stronger rubric alignment and greater pedagogical coherence. Inter-rater reliability analyses indicated moderate human–human agreement and weaker alignment of LLM judges to the human mean. Originality: CourseEvalAI integrates rubric-guided fine-tuning, dual-layer evaluation, and graph-based storage into a unified framework. This combination provides a replicable and interpretable methodology that enhances the consistency, transparency, and pedagogical value of LLM-based evaluators in higher education and beyond.

(1) Background and objective: Mobility is crucial for healthy aging, and its loss significantly impacts the quality of life, healthcare costs, and mortality among older adults. Clinical mobility assessment methods, though precise, are resource-intensive and economically impractical, and most of the existing solutions for automatic detection of mobility anomalies are either obtrusive or improper for long time monitoring. This study explores the feasibility of using non-intrusive, low-cost binary sensors for continuous, remote detection of mobility anomalies in older adults, aiming to identify both sudden mobility events and gradual mobility loss. (2) Method: The study utilized publicly available datasets (CASAS Aruba and HH120) containing annotated activity data recorded from binary sensors installed in residential environments. After data preprocessing—including filtering irrelevant sensor events and aggregation into behaviorally meaningful places (BMPs)—a time series forecasting model (Prophet) was used to predict normal mobility patterns. A fuzzy inference module analyzed deviations between observed and predicted sensor data to determine the probability of mobility anomalies. (3) Results: The system effectively identified periods of prolonged inactivity indicative of potential falls or other mobility disruptions. Preliminary evaluation indicated a detection rate of approximately 77–81% for point mobility anomalies, with a false positive rate ranging from 12 to 16%. Additionally, the approach successfully detected simulated gradual declines in mobility (1% per day reduction), evidenced by statistically significant regression trends in activity levels over time. (4) Conclusions: The study argues that non-intrusive binary sensors, combined with lightweight forecasting models and fuzzy inference, may provide a practical and scalable solution for detecting mobility anomalies in older adults. Although performance can be further enhanced through improved data preprocessing, predictive modeling, and anomaly threshold tuning, the proposed system effectively addresses key limitations of existing mobility assessment approaches.

Background and objectives: Automated evaluation of open-ended responses remains a persistent challenge, particularly when consistency, transparency, and reproducibility are required. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in rubric-based evaluation, their reliability across multiple evaluators is still uncertain. Variability in scoring, feedback, and rubric adherence raises concerns about interpretability and system robustness. This study introduces GraderAssist, a graph-based, rubric-guided, multi-LLM framework designed to ensure transparent and reproducible automated evaluation. Methods: GraderAssist evaluates a dataset of 220 responses to both technical and argumentative questions, collected from undergraduate computer science courses. Six open-source LLMs and GPT-4 (as expert reference) independently scored each response using two predefined rubrics. All outputs—including scores, feedback, and metadata—were parsed, validated, and stored in a Neo4j graph database, enabling structured querying, traceability, and longitudinal analysis. Results: Cross-model analysis revealed systematic differences in scoring behavior and feedback generation. Some models produced more generous evaluations, while others aligned closely with GPT-4. Semantic analysis using Sentence-BERT embeddings highlighted distinctive feedback styles and variable rubric adherence. Inter-model agreement was stronger for technical criteria but diverged substantially for argumentative tasks. Originality: GraderAssist integrates rubric-guided evaluation, multi-model comparison, and graph-based storage into a unified pipeline. By emphasizing reproducibility, transparency, and fine-grained analysis of evaluator behavior, it advances the design of interpretable automated evaluation systems with applications in education and beyond.

As the demand for more accurate crime prediction and risk assessment grows, researchers have been developing smarter models that blend statistical methods with machine learning. This study compares a hybrid ARIMA-ANN model with traditional classification techniques to see which best forecast monthly crime risk levels in Galați County, Romania. The analysis is based on a newly compiled dataset of 132 monthly observations from January 2014 to December 2024, which combines a broad array of social, economic, and environmental data points. The main variable, ‘Crime risk’, is based on normalized counts of offenses per capita and divided into five balanced levels: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. The hybrid ARIMA-ANN model merges the strengths of statistical time series analysis with the flexible learning ability of artificial neural networks. Performance is evaluated against multinomial logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and support vector machines. Overall, the results show that an ARIMA-ANN model consistently outperforms traditional methods, especially in recognizing patterns over time, seasonal trends, and complex nonlinear relationships in crime data. This study not only sets a new benchmark for crime analytics in Romania but also offers a flexible, scalable framework for classifying crime risk levels across different regions.

(1) Background and objective: Mobility is crucial for healthy aging, and its loss significantly impacts the quality of life, healthcare costs, and mortality among older adults. Clinical mobility assessment methods, though precise, are resource-intensive and economically impractical and most of the existing solutions for automatic detection of mobility anomalies are either obtrusive, or improper for long time monitoring. This study explores the feasibility of using non-intrusive, low-cost binary sensors for continuous, remote detection of mobility anomalies in older adults, aiming to identify both sudden mobility events and gradual mobility loss. (2) Method: The study utilized publicly available datasets (CASAS Aruba and HH120) containing annotated activity data recorded from binary sensors installed in residential environments. After data preprocessing—including filtering irrelevant sensor events and aggregation into behaviorally meaningful places (BMPs)—a time series forecasting model (Prophet) was used to predict normal mobility patterns. A fuzzy inference module analyzed deviations between observed and predicted sensor data to determine the probability of mobility anomalies. (3) Results: The system effectively identified periods of prolonged inactivity indicative of potential falls or other mobility disruptions. Preliminary evaluation indicated a detection rate of approximately 77–81% for point mobility anomalies, with a false positive rate ranging from 12–16%. Additionally, the approach successfully detected simulated gradual declines in mobility (1% per day reduction), evidenced by statistically significant regression trends in activity levels over time. (4) Conclusion: The study argues that non-intrusive binary sensors, combined with lightweight forecasting models and fuzzy inference, may provide a practical and scalable solution for detecting mobility anomalies in older adults. Although performance can be further enhanced through improved data preprocessing, predictive modeling, and anomaly threshold tuning, the proposed system effectively addresses key limitations of existing mobility assessment approaches.