The management of segmental bone defects presents a complex reconstruction challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Current treatment options are limited by efficacy across the spectrum of injury, morbidity, and cost. Regional gene therapy is a promising tissue engineering strategy for bone repair, as it allows for local implantation of nucleic acids or genetically modified cells to direct specific protein expression. In cell-based gene therapy approaches, a variety of different cell types have been described including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from multiple sources—bone marrow, adipose, skeletal muscle, and umbilical cord tissue, among others. MSCs, in particular, have been well studied, as they serve as a source of osteoprogenitor cells in addition to providing a vehicle for transgene delivery. Furthermore, MSCs possess immunomodulatory properties, which may support the development of an allogeneic “off-the-shelf” gene therapy product. Identifying an optimal cell type is paramount to the successful clinical translation of cell-based gene therapy approaches. Here, we review current strategies for the management of segmental bone loss in orthopedic surgery, including bone grafting, bone graft substitutes, and operative techniques. We also highlight regional gene therapy as a tissue engineering strategy for bone repair, with a focus on cell types and cell sources suitable for this application.

Ex vivo regional gene therapy is a promising tissue-engineering strategy for bone regeneration: osteogenic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can be genetically modified to express an osteoinductive stimulus (e.g., bone morphogenetic protein-2), seeded onto an osteoconductive scaffold, and then implanted into a bone defect to exert a therapeutic effect. Compared to recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2), which is approved for clinical use, regional gene therapy may have unique benefits related to the addition of MSCs and the sustained release of BMP-2. However, the cellular and transcriptional mechanisms regulating the response to these two strategies for BMP-2 mediated bone regeneration are largely unknown. Here, for the first time, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (10x Genomics) of hematoma tissue in six rats with critical-sized femoral defects that were treated with either regional gene therapy or rhBMP-2. Our unbiased bioinformatic analysis of 2393 filtered cells in each group revealed treatment-specific differences in their cellular composition, transcriptional profiles, and cellular communication patterns. Gene therapy treatment induced a more robust chondrogenic response, as well as a decrease in the proportion of fibroblasts and the expression of profibrotic pathways. Additionally, gene therapy was associated with an anti-inflammatory microenvironment; macrophages expressing canonical anti-inflammatory markers were more common in the gene therapy group. In contrast, pro-inflammatory markers were more highly expressed in the rhBMP-2 group. Collectively, the results of our study may offer insights into the unique pathways through which ex vivo regional gene therapy can augment bone regeneration compared to rhBMP-2. Furthermore, an improved understanding of the cellular pathways involved in segmental bone defect healing may allow for the further optimization of regional gene therapy or other bone repair strategies.