The gingival epithelium acts as a physical barrier to separate the biofilm from the gingival tissue, providing the first line of defense against bacterial invasion in periodontal disease. Disruption of the gingival epithelial barrier, and the subsequent penetration of exogenous pathogens into the host tissues, triggers an inflammatory response, establishing chronic infection. Currently, more than 700 different bacterial species have been identified in the oral cavity, some of which are known to be periodontopathic. These bacteria contribute to epithelial barrier dysfunction in the gingiva by producing several virulence factors. However, some bacteria in the oral cavity appear to be beneficial, helping gingival epithelial cells maintain their integrity and barrier function. This review aims to discuss current findings regarding microorganism interactions and epithelial barrier function in the oral cavity, with reference to investigations in the gut, where this interaction has been extensively studied.

Laminin, a basement membrane heterotrimeric glycoprotein composed of α/β/γ subunits, has important tissue-specific functions in the control of cellular behavior. Our recent study showed the colocalization of CD163⁺ M2-like macrophages with Schwann cells in human dental pulp, leading us to hypothesize that the laminin isoform of Schwann cells is associated with CD163 expression. The present study investigated the distribution of laminin isoforms in human dental pulp and the underlying mechanisms that affect macrophage phenotypes. Immunofluorescence analysis indicated that blood vessels were exclusively positive for laminin α4 and α5, whereas laminin α2 was associated with Schwann cells. Unexpectedly, laminin α3/laminin-332 (α3β3γ2) was detected on lymphatic vessels. In intact and carious teeth, CD163⁺ cells were associated with laminin α2, whereas CD206 single-positive cells were present inside, outside, and along blood vessels. In vitro incubation of THP-1 macrophages in plates coated with laminin-211/511 or its functionally analogous E8 fragments of α-chain (E8-α) indicated that cell shapes differed between macrophages grown on laminin-211/E8-α2 and macrophages grown on laminin-511/E8-α5. Laminin-211/E8-α2–coated plates upregulated CD163 expression, compared with laminin-511/E8-α5–coated plates. Integrin α3– and integrin α6–neutralizing Abs altered the shape of THP-1 macrophages and upregulated mRNA levels of CD206 and CD163 in macrophages grown on laminin-511; the neutralizing Abs did not affect macrophages grown on laminin-211. These findings suggest that laminin isoforms differentially regulate macrophage behavior via distinct integrin–laminin affinities. Of note, laminin-332 is expressed by pulpal lymphatic vessels, the existence of which has been debated; laminin-211 might have a role in maintaining CD163 expression on macrophages.

Background and Objectives: Autologous bone grafting is the first choice for reconstructive surgery in bone defects due to trauma or malignant tumors. However, there is an increasing demand for minimally invasive alternatives involving bone regeneration using artificial materials. Biomimetic materials that replicate the body’s microscopic structure, such as Cellnest^®, are gaining attention. Cellnest is a xeno-free recombinant peptide based on human type I collagen, containing a rich Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif related to cell adhesion. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Cellnest with existing collagen materials (Pelnac^®, Integra^®, Terudermis^®) on bone regeneration and elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Materials and Methods: In vivo experiments involved a rat model of calvarial bone defects, in which Cellnest and other collagen materials were implanted into the defect area. Bone formation was assessed after 4 weeks using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histological analysis. In vitro experiments included the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), adhesion, and migration assays, and a real-time polymerase chain reaction using rapidly expanding cells (RECs) to explore the mechanisms of Cellnest’s bone regenerative capacity. Results: The micro-CT analysis showed that the regenerated bone area was significantly greater in the Cellnest group (72.3%) than in the Pelnac^® (25.5%), Integra^® (31.6%), and Terudermis^® (38.3%) groups. The histological analysis confirmed similar trends, with Cellnest showing 42.2% bone regeneration, outperforming the other materials. The in vitro assays revealed that Cellnest promoted cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration. Gene expression analysis demonstrated that Cellnest significantly increased the levels of the bone formation markers ALP and COL1. Conclusions: Cellnest, a human type I collagen-like peptide rich in RGD motifs, enhances bone regeneration by promoting MSC adhesion and migration, and bone formation-related gene expression. The findings suggest its potential as an effective material for bone defect reconstruction.

Cell-based bone regenerative therapy exhibits considerable potential in the treatment of bone defects caused by trauma, disease, and congenital anomalies. The periosteum, a fibrous membrane covering the outer surface of bone, plays a crucial role in bone formation and regeneration by sourcing osteoprogenitor cells. The remarkable osteogenic potential of periosteal cells (PCs) has led to the effective clinical implementation of PC-based regenerative therapies and tissue engineering. The abundance of progenitor cells in cultured PCs is well established; however, the heterogeneity of the cell population and its impact on bone regeneration remain uncertain. In this study, we aimed to characterize the heterogeneity of cultured PCs via single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) and to examine their osteogenic potential in vivo. Human PCs cultivated using the tissue explant method were utilized in this study. scRNA-seq and real-time PCR were performed to examine the cellular heterogeneity and osteogenic capacity of the cultured PCs. Experimental bone formation by the cultured PCs was examined using the rat model of subcutaneous implantation. ScRNA-seq analysis showed that the cultured PCs were categorized into three cell types (osteoprogenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and fibroblasts) with specific gene expression patterns. In addition, the cellular population and osteogenic capacity differed between the central and peripheral regions in the culture dish. The PCs in the central region showed higher osteogenic potential than those in the peripheral region. This study revealed the diversity of the composition of the PCs and their distinct osteogenic capabilities in different regions in the culture dish. The findings may provide promising prospects for the development of more efficacious regenerative therapeutic applications using cultured PCs in the future.