Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented numerous challenges to the global healthcare system and emerging evidence suggests a potential link between COVID-19 treatment, specifically steroid therapy, and the development of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the hip. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of recent studies and case reports investigating the relationship between COVID-19, corticosteroid therapy, and the development of AVN. Understanding the nuances of AVN in the context of COVID-19 is crucial for healthcare professionals to navigate treatment decisions and mitigate potential complications. Materials and Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and a Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) were used in the systematic review until 1 September 2023. The full texts of the remaining twenty-three (n = 23) articles were independently reviewed by the authors of this review. Conclusions: The association between steroid therapy for COVID-19 and the development of hip AVN is a noteworthy concern even though no relationship is evident between the duration of treatment, cumulative dosage of medication, maximum daily dosage received, and presence of AVN. Further research with larger cohorts and long-term follow up is needed to better understand the causative relationship and optimal management strategies for hip AVN in the context of COVID-19 and steroid therapy.

Background: To investigate the functional status and recording the most common injuries of the upper limb in male Greek boxing squad in comparison to the general population.Methods: A retrospective injury surveillance study using an electronic questionnaire was performed in 2021. The questionnaire was sent to male members of the Greek Boxing Federation and consisted of three parts. Demographic data, functional status scales, training conditions, hours of training, the location and description of upper limb injuries and whether the injury occurred during competition or training and also whether it was a new or a recurrent one were gathered. The same questionnaire was sent to non-boxer males (military recruits), but without asking them to report any training parameters. Inclusion criteria were age < 35 years-old for all participants and no involvement in martial arts for the control group. Also, all participants (boxers and non-boxers) completed the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scale and the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quick-DASH) score.Results: The final study cohort was consisted of 62 elite or amateur boxers and 75 non-boxer males, less than 35 years old. The quick-DASH score was found to be significantly lower (better) in boxers in comparison to the general population (15.65 ± 10.25 vs. 12.55 ± 8.62;p = 0.020) whereas the PRWE score was similar in both groups (9.25 ± 14.96 vs. 8.61 ± 13.05;p = 0.843). Physical therapy sessions, thumb injuries and boxer’s knuckle were also found to be significantly higher in the boxers group. On the other hand, upper limb surgeries were significantly less in the boxers group. Finally, the size of boxing gloves was associated to the number of finger fractures, thumb injuries and ulnar sided wrist pain in boxers.Conclusions: Although a controversial sport, boxing appears to have no long-term consequences to the upper limb function, especially regarding hand performance. The size of gloves during heavy bag training was found to be an aggravating factor for hand injuries.

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most injured ligaments, with approximately 100,000 ACL reconstructions taking place annually in the United States. In order to successfully manage ACL rupture, it is of the utmost importance to understand the anatomy, unique physiology, and biomechanics of the ACL, as well as the injury mechanisms and healing capacity. Currently, the “gold standard” for the treatment of ACL ruptures is surgical reconstruction, particularly for young patients or athletes expecting to return to pivoting sports. Although ACL reconstruction boasts a high success rate, patients may face different, serious post-operative complications, depending on the type of graft and technique used in each one of them. Tissue engineering is a multidisciplinary field that could contribute to the formation of a tissue-engineered ACL graft manufactured by a combination of the appropriate stem-cell type, a suitable scaffold, and specific growth factors, combined with mechanical stimuli. In this review, we discuss the aspects that constitute the creation of a successful tissue-engineered graft while also underlining the current drawbacks that arise for each issue. Finally, we highlight the benefits of incorporating new technologies like artificial intelligence and machine learning that could revolutionize tissue engineering.

Clinical performance, anterior knee stability, and isokinetic strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts are mainly influenced by graft selection, femoral tunnel preparation, and type of femoral fixation. Expandable femoral fixation devices are expected to provide a stronger initial fixation with circular graft compression, a blind-ended tunnel in the femur with less enlargement, and a theoretical double-band ACL equivalent through graft rotation. This study aimed to evaluate isokinetic strength and functional capacity after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons using two different anatomical femoral fixation techniques (expandable vs fixed-looped button). A total of 48 male patients with ACL deficient knees were randomized to two different femoral fixation groups, namely, the expandable (AperFix) and the standard cortical (Button) group. The primary outcome measures were isokinetic hamstrings and quadriceps strength capabilities and the hamstrings/quadriceps ratio at 60 degrees/second (°/s) and 180°/s using a Cybex before and at three, six, nine, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Secondary measurements were anteroposterior knee stability at two years (using KT-1000 arthrometer) and the functional outcome using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000) form, the Tegner activity scale, and the Lysholm knee score. Data were compared using a paired t-test and analysis of variance, with a p < 0.05 level of significance. Most patients regained the 60°/s quadriceps strength between three and 12 months (62.5% for the Button group vs. 50% for the AperFix group), as well as the 180°/s strength (79.17% vs 70.83%); however, at the 24-month evaluation, seven (29.17%) patients in the Button group and five (20.83%) in the AperFix group had significant deficits. The 60°/s flexor strength was regained in the first six months in 19 (79.17%) patients in the Button group and in 16 (66.7%) patients in the AperFix group, whereas the percentages for the 180°/s strength were 79.17% and 75%, respectively. Beyond the 24-month evaluation, only three (12.5%) patients in the Button group and four (16.67%) in the AperFix group had significant flexor deficits. Regarding the H/Q ratio, at 60°/s, the mean recovery time was six and 7.5 months for the Button and AperFix groups, respectively, whereas 15 and 12 patients, respectively, did not recover during the two-year duration. At 180°/s, a mean recovery time of six months was needed for the button group, and nine patients did not recover two years later. For the AperFix group, nine months were needed, and 12 patients did not recover in two years. Clinical performance and anterior knee stability showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Although there were no significant differences in clinical performance, knee stability, and isokinetic strength testing between expandable and cortical button femoral fixation groups, return to play was doubtful at two years postoperatively.