Background: Although colorectal surgery (CRS) has currently almost entirely standardized surgical procedures, it can still show pitfalls such as the intraoperative ureteral injury. Intraoperative ureteral identification (IUI) could reduce the ureteral injuries rate but evidence is still lacking. We aimed to analyze the utility and the effectiveness of real-time IUI in minimally invasive CRS. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed examining available data on randomized and nonrandomized studies evaluating the utility of intraureteral fluorescence dye (IFD) and lighted ureteral stent (LUS) for intraoperative identification of ureters in CRS, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Primary endpoint was ureteral injuries rate. Secondary endpoints included acute kidney injury, hematuria, urinary tract infections (UTI), and fluorescence assessment. Results: After literature search, 158 studies have been recorded, 36 studies underwent full-text reviews and 12 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, out of a total of 822 patients who successfully received IUI, 3 (0.33%) patients experienced ureteral injury. Hematuria was reported in 689 (97.6%) of patients following LUS-guided surgery and in 1 (2%) patient following IFD-guided surgery, although transient in all cases. UTI was reported in 15 (3.3%) LUS-guided resections and in 1 (2%) IFD-guided resections. Acute kidney injury occurred in 23 (2.5%) LUS-guided surgery and 1 (1%) IFD-guided surgery. Conclusions: Real-time ureteral identification techniques could represent a valid solution in complex minimally invasive CRS, safely, with no time consuming and always reproducible by surgeons. Prospective studies will be needed to confirm these findings.

Background: Looking for anomalies and vascular control gains a central role in colon cancer surgery. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) presents technical challenges, primarily due to the considerable variability in the arterial configuration of the right colon. The importance of understanding colonic vascular anatomy has become more prominent with the adoption of this surgical technique. The aim of this study is to systematically review the vascular anatomical variations in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in the setting of extended lymphadenectomy for CME in right colon cancer and to show its impact in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on Medline (PubMed), Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The following criteria were set for inclusion: (1) studies reporting minimally invasive (robotic, laparoscopic, and hybrid techniques) or open CME/D3 lymphadenectomy; (2) studies reporting patients with right-sided colon cancer; (3) studies reporting the description or illustration of SMA variations. The methodological quality of all included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: After the literature search, 800 studies were recorded, 31 studies underwent full-text reviews, and 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported vascular variations in SMA, and the total number of patients was 813. No intraoperative complications were reported. In 6.4% of patients, post-operative bleeding occurred. Conclusions: Vascular anatomical variations are not a rare entity. In experienced centers, vascular anomalies are not associated with an increase in complications, both in traditional open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). However, in MIS, full access to central vessels and intraoperative vascular control, moderate retraction, safety maneuvers, and accurate vascular dissection are mandatory.