Background: Headache is the most common COVID-19-related neurological symptom. We aimed to reveal diagnostic clues of headache for COVID-19 infection and to investigate the course of primary headaches during the pandemic. Methods: We developed a detailed web-based questionnaire screening the characteristics and course of headaches besides clinical COVID-19 features. The participants were grouped according to being diagnosed with COVID-19 infection or not, and having previous or new-onset headaches. The COVID-19 related headache features and their associations with other clinical features were investigated. A binary logistic regression model was performed to differentiate the characteristics of headache related to COVID-19. Findings: A total of 3458 participants (2341 females;67.7%, 1495 healthcare workers;43.2%) with a mean age of 43.21 ± 11.2 years contributed to the survey. Among them, 262 participants had COVID-19 diagnosis and 126 (48.1%) were male. The rate of males in the group without COVID-19 was 31% (991 out of 3196 participants) showing significant gender difference between groups (p < 0.000). COVID-19 related headaches were more closely associated with anosmia/ageusia and gastrointestinal complaints (p < 0.000 and p < 0.000), and showed different characteristics like pulsating, pressing, and even stabbing quality. Logistic regression analyses showed that bilateral headache, duration over 72 h, analgesic resistance and having male gender were significant variables to differentiate COVID-19 positive patients from those without COVID-19 (p = 0.04 for long duration and p < 0.000 for others). A worsening of previous primary headaches due to the pandemic-related problems was not reported in the majority of patients. Interpretation: Bilateral, long-lasting headaches, resistance to analgesics and having male gender were more frequent in people with COVID-19 in conjunction with anosmia/ageusia and gastrointestinal complaints. These features may be helpful for diagnosing the headache related to COVID-19 during the pandemic.

Objective: Our aim was to assess the long-term follow-up of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), with an emphasis on the course of the myoclonic seizures. Methods: We enrolled 48 patients with JME (29 F, 19 M; aged 39.9 ± 9.5 years) followed up for a mean of 19.6 ± 5.7 years. The remission for 5 years and relapses were evaluated for all seizure types and the changes in severity/frequency of myoclonia were systematically questioned. The clinical and EEG features, antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment regimen, and systemic and psychiatric comorbid diseases were evaluated. Results: We found a benign course in 66.6% whereas 16.7% had pseudo-resistance due to problems in treatment or lifestyle. The true-resistant course observed in the remaining 16.7% was significantly associated with psychiatric disorders and the presence of thyroid diseases. In 54.2% of the patients, myoclonia were in remission for a mean duration of 8.4 ± 7.7 years, after an average age of 32.9 ± 9.6. Of these patients, 6 were on a lower dose of AED in comparison to the dosage needed to control the seizures in the beginning, and 5 patients had stopped AED treatment. None of the latter 11 patients except one relapsed during the follow-up. Furthermore, 21 other patients (43.8%) described substantial alleviation after age 31.3 ± 8.4 in the severity of myoclonia. Conclusion: Although a great majority of the patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy had continuing seizures after a follow-up of 20 years, almost all had either 5-year remission or a substantial alleviation of the myoclonic seizures.