Earthen building materials bear interesting environmental advantages and are the most appropriate to conserve historical earth constructions. To improve mechanical properties, these materials are often stabilized with cement or lime, but the impact of the stabilizers on the water transport properties, which are also critical, has been very rarely evaluated. The researchers have tested four earth-based repair mortars applied on three distinct and representative rammed earth surfaces. Three mortars are based on earth collected from rammed earth buildings in south of Portugal and the fourth mortar is based on a commercial clayish earth. The main objective of the work was over the commercial earth mortar, applied stabilized and not stabilized on the three rammed earth surfaces to repair, to assess the influence of the stabilizers. The other three earth mortars (not stabilized) were applied on each type of rammed earth, representing the repair only made with local materials. The four unstabilized earth...

Unstabilized rammed earth is a recyclable, economical, and eco-friendly building material, used in the past and still applied today. Traditionally, its use was based on a long empirical knowledge of the local materials. Because this knowledge was mostly lost or is no longer sufficient, in many countries normative documents have been produced to allow the assessment of rammed earth soils. With the aim of contributing for a refining of these normative requirements, this article presents a research work that included: (i) collection of Unstabilized rammed earth samples from six constructions in Portugal; (ii) a literature survey of normative and complementary documents to identify the most mentioned key-properties, the test procedures and the corresponding threshold limits; and (iii) a discussion of the test procedures and of the thresholds limits in the light of the experimental results. The analyzed properties are the particle size distribution, maximum particle size, plasticity, compaction, linear shrinkage, organic content, and salt content. The work highlights the advantages of taking into account the characteristics of existing constructions as a basis for the establishment and further refining of consistent threshold values. In particular, it shows that it is essential to adjust the requirements to the specificities of local materials.

The paper presents the results of an experimental program to evaluate the viability of concrete made when various ratios of coarse natural aggregates (CNAs) are replaced with coarse recycled concrete aggregates (CRCAs), coarse recycled ceramic masonry and mortar aggregates (CRMMAs), or both. Results show that incorporation of CRCA and of CRCA and CRMMA simultaneously has no effect on compressive strength. However, this property decreases when only CRMMA is incorporated. A reduction of 23.6% in compressive strength was obtained when 50% of CRMMA was used. Splitting tensile strength is unaffected by incorporation of CRCA but it is affected by incorporation of CRMMA. The mixes with 50% of CRMMA showed a reduction of 20.1% in tensile strength. Every recycled aggregate concrete type suffered a linear decrease of modulus of elasticity as the replacement ratio of CNA by coarse recycled aggregates increased. The use of 100% CRCA caused a decrease in modulus of elasticity of 30%. In the mixes with 50% of CRMMA that decrease was 22.2%. Shrinkage was significantly affected by incorporation of course recycled aggregates, although the degree of shrinkage varied in accordance with their nature and incorporation ratio. For replacement ratios between 50 and 100%, the difference between a reference concrete (RC) and the mixes with CRCA remained constant, inside a 30% increase range.