Soumitra Pathare

Dr. Soumitra Pathare

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2011 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NDNatalie Drew
Natalie Drew
MFMichelle Funk
Michelle Funk
STStephen Tang
Stephen Tang
JLJagannath Lamichhane
Jagannath Lamichhane
ECElena Chávez
Elena Chávez
BSBenedetto Saraceno
Benedetto Saraceno

1 October 2017 in The Lancet Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDinesh Bhugra
Dinesh Bhugra
ATAllan Tasman
Allan Tasman
SPSoumitra Pathare
Soumitra Pathare
SPStefan Priebe
Stefan Priebe
SSShubulade Smith
Shubulade Smith
AVAntonio Ventriglio
Antonio Ventriglio

1 June 1992 in The British Journal of Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMitchell G. Weiss
Mitchell G. Weiss
DDD. R. Doongaji
D. R. Doongaji
SSS. Siddhartha
S. Siddhartha
DWDavid Wypij
David Wypij
SPSoumitra Pathare
Soumitra Pathare
RFR. Fernandes
R. Fernandes
The Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue (EMIC) has been developed to elicit illness-related perceptions, beliefs, and practices in a cultural study of leprosy and mental health in Bombay. Leprosy is an especially appropriate disorder for studying the inter-relationship of culture, mental health and medical illness because of deeply rooted cultural meanings, the emotional burden, and underuse of effective therapy. Fifty per cent of 56 recently diagnosed leprosy out-patients, 37% of 19 controls with another stigmatised dermatological condition (vitiligo), but only 8% of 12 controls with a comparable non-stigmatised condition (tinea versicolor) met DSM–III–R criteria for an axis I depressive, anxiety or somatoform disorder. Belief in a humoral (traditional) cause of illness predicted better attendance at clinic.

1 February 1996 in The British Journal of Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GWGeoffrey Wolff
Geoffrey Wolff
SPSoumitra Pathare
Soumitra Pathare
JCJom Craig
Jom Craig
JLJulian Leff
Julian Leff
Background: We test the hypothesis that negative attitudes to mentally ill people may be fuelled by a lack of knowledge.Method: A census of knowledge of mental illness was conducted in two areas prior to the opening of long-stay supported houses for the mentally ill in each area. Three attitudinal factors (Fear and Exclusion, Social Control and Goodwill) which had been extracted by factor analysis of the Community Attitudes toward the Mentally III (CAMI) inventory (see previous paper) were analysed in respect of their associations with knowledge of mental illness.Results: Most respondents (80%) knew of somebody who had a mental illness but a substantial proportion of respondents had little knowledge about mental illness. Social Control showed an association with knowledge of mental illness. Groups who showed more socially controlling attitudes (especially those over 50 years old, those of lower social class, and those of non-Caucasian ethnic origin) had less knowledge about mental illness. Regression analysis revealed that when knowledge was taken into account age had no effect on Social Control, and the effect of social class and ethnic origin was diminished Respondents with children, who showed more Fear and Exclusion, were not less knowledgeable about mental illness.Conclusions: The results support the hypothesis that negative attitudes, especially in older people, are fuelled by a lack of knowledge. Negative attitudes among people with children are not related to a lack of knowledge.

9 March 2018 in Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPSoumitra Pathare
Soumitra Pathare
ABA. Brazinova
A. Brazinova
ILI. Levav
I. Levav
Aim.: Treatment gap refers to the percentage of individuals who require treatment in a country or a defined community but do not receive it due to various reasons. There is widespread acceptance of ‘treatment gap’ as a measure of unmet needs in mental health. However, the term ‘treatment’ carries a medical connotation and implies biomedical treatment (or lack of it) of mental illness and is often interpreted by policymakers, planners and researchers, as well as by non-professional stakeholders as exclusively referring to curative clinical psychiatric interventions. This common interpretation results in the exclusion of a range of effective psychosocial interventions available today. Treatment gap also does not include physical health services for persons with mental illness, a major concern due to the relative frequent yet highly unattended physical comorbidity and early mortality of persons with severe mental illness.Methods & Results.: We, therefore, propose a more comprehensive measure of unmet needs.

21 March 2009 in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMichelle Kermode
Michelle Kermode
KBKathryn Bowen
Kathryn Bowen
SAShoba Arole
Shoba Arole
SPSoumitra Pathare
Soumitra Pathare
Anthony JormAnthony Jorm
Anthony Jorm